Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "sure_".
Did you mean:
sure
2005 Mar 14
0
FW: Package Installation in RGui (PR#7262)
...Since you _incorrectly_ assume that the syntax is incorrect, the rest of
> your assumption is incorrect. As the FAQ asks, please don't speculate
> about things you are not expert about, but stick to facts. Also as the
> FAQ asks, don't misuse R-bugs for things you do not know _for sure_ are
> bugs in R.
>
> FYI, Windows accepts both /and \ in file paths, including a mixture. If
> your speculation was correct install.packages() would work for no one, and
> do you seriously think that such a bug would go unreported and unfixed.
>
> We have seen this once befor...
2004 Oct 05
2
Package Installation in RGui (PR#7262)
Full_Name: Heather Turner
Version: 2.0.0
OS: Windows NT
Submission from: (NULL) (137.205.8.2)
I tried using the Packages menu to install the gam package and get the following
output:
> local({a <- CRAN.packages()
+ install.packages(select.list(a[,1],,TRUE), .libPaths()[1], available=a,
dependencies=TRUE)})
trying URL `http://cran.r-project.org/bin/windows/contrib/2.0/PACKAGES'
Content
2006 Oct 13
3
Validation errors in has_one/belongs_to relationships.
I have two objects, QuoteInput and Insured.
QuoteInput has one Insured and Insured belongs to QuoteInput.
I don''t understand what I''m seeing.
I assign an Insured to a QuoteInput. The Insured object has invalid
data.
I call save! on the quote input. QuoteInput has no validations.
I expect two things to happen - 1) an exception should be thrown,
indicating that there was a
2005 Mar 11
2
Package Installation in RGui (PR#7262)
In reference to the thread
http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/devel/04/10/0859.html
I have the same problem updating packages with newly-installed version of
released version of R 2.0.1. Previous posts refer to a bug in windows. I
wonder if there is a work-around? This probably should go to R-help but it
follows on from the post in R-devel. Apologies in advance.
OS: Windows XP Professional,
2014 Jun 24
2
isohybrid has 2 variants
> Hi,
>
> i have written an introduction to isohybrid and put it on
> the discussion page of the ISOLINUX wiki.
>
> http://www.syslinux.org/wiki/index.php/Talk:ISOLINUX#Proposal_for_description_of_isohybrid
>
> Review and proposals are appreciated.
>
> The reference to "above mkisofs command" anticipates the final
> position of this text at the end
2014 Jun 24
7
isohybrid has 2 variants
...e is just for this example.
Note 3: "-eltorito-platform 0xEF" is equivalent to
"-eltorito-platform efi". If I am not mistaken, this is the
equivalent to xorriso's "-e".
Note 4: Part of the options are new since some 3.01a(lpha) version.
Note 5: Although _I am not sure_, I think other possibilities could
be:
-eltorito-boot EFI/BOOT/BOOTX64.IMG
-eltorito-boot EFI/BOOT/BOOTX64.EFI
instead of the above "-eltorito-boot isolinux/efiboot.img" but that's
for someone (else) to test and confirm.
>
>
> Have a nice day :)
>
> Thomas
&g...