search for: superfish

Hey All I''m Using Xen 3.0.3-105 on CentOS 5.5. It Has to Nics: eth0 - Internet eth1 - Internal Lan ( where Dhcp , DNs , Cobbler - Kick Start Server Resides ) I''ve Set xend-config.xsp to create xenbr1 on eth1 and it looks well So Guest May Get Access TO ALl Resources via the Bridge. brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces xenbr1

...pdate over http. > > Since the packages themselves are signed, what risk are you concerned > about? > Not only are the packages signed, but we're now offering signed repository metadata as well. HTTPS is an incremental improvement, but is by no means a silver bullet. Look at the superfish fiasco if anyone thinks otherwise. The other side to this is many people update from outside .centos.org. Who's cert would you use for mirrors.kernel.org/centos/7/os/x86_64/ for example? -- Jim Perrin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77

...*= require_tree ./internet */ and applicatiion_intranet.css /* * application-intranet.css * *= require_self *= require_tree ./intranet */ to include only the css under the two directories. application.css is: *= require_self *= require colorbox *= require jquery.multiselect *= require superfish *= require_directory . */ What can I do if I want to exclude the files under internet and intranet directories? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5T...

On 04/15/2015 01:01 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote: > Hi, > > Dell provides laptops with RHEL ws. Buy one of that kind ? Some quick googles only turned up articles about RHEL on Dell Laptops in 2012 - nothing with RHEL seems to be current only with Ubuntu 14.04 . > Eero > > 2015-04-15 19:55 GMT+03:00 Steve Clark <sclark at netwolves.com>: > >> Hello, >> >>

What are the plans for the CentOS repos with respect to authentication and https everywhere? At the moment it is a trivial exercise to perform a MTM attack during a yum update over http. -- *** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB at Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited

...packages themselves are signed, what risk are you concerned >> about? >> > > Not only are the packages signed, but we're now offering signed > repository metadata as well. > > HTTPS is an incremental improvement, but is by no means a silver bullet. > Look at the superfish fiasco if anyone thinks otherwise. > > The other side to this is many people update from outside .centos.org. > Who's cert would you use for mirrors.kernel.org/centos/7/os/x86_64/ for > example? Agreed, MITM isn't a great problem as the packages are signed. People monitoring...

Don't flame me, but I really recommend using Ubuntu on laptops. If you really want CentOS, you should go with version 7. Many new laptops won't work well with that either though. CentOS 6 only works well these days on older hardware or on virtual machines. On Apr 27, 2016 7:27 PM, "Brian Bernard" <brian.brianbernard at gmail.com> wrote: Hi all, I'm looking at buying

I've had success on "older" model Lenovos.....(T-410 / T-420 / T-430) but anything beyond those seems to have some issue or another. I was even able to swap the standard drive to an SD (250GB) on a T-430 and it's running g like a champ. A lot of the newer stuff is OK as long as you don't have any boutique drivers for video network or sound. YMMV. On Sep 29, 2016 9:18 PM, John