Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "summmary".
Did you mean:
summary
2000 May 09
1
Type III Sums of Squares?
...de would
have to do it.
If including the functionality via an additional parameter doesn't require a
whole rebuild of summary.aov, I'd like to put it as a minor item on the
wish-list for some next version of R.
Cheers (and thanks for a great piece of software)
Kaspar Pflugshaupt
"summmary.aov.t3" <-
function (aov.obj)
{
# ugly hack, relies on names in output
# tables of drop1 and summary.aov
s <- summary(aov.obj)
d <- drop1(aov.obj, test = "F")
n <- nrow(d)
s[[1]]$"Sum Sq"[1:(n - 1)] <- d$Sum[2:n]
s[[1]]$"Me...
2010 Jun 22
0
survfit function - event information??
...iable names represented in my function
(ee) are shown below, but none of those variables correspond to the
column
of events as shown in the output.
-----------------------------
The easiest is to use the summary function:
fit <- survfit(Surv(time, status) ~ ph.ecog, data=lung)
temp <- summmary(fit)
temp$table
records n.max n.start events median 0.95LCL 0.95UCL
ph.ecog=0 63 63 63 37 394 348 574
ph.ecog=1 113 113 113 82 306 268 429
ph.ecog=2 50 50 50 44 199 156 288
ph.ecog=3 1 1 1...
2006 Jul 05
2
p-values
Dear All,
When I run rlm to obtain robust standard errors, my output does not include
p-values. Is there any reason p-values should not be used in this case? Is
there an argument I could use in rlm so that the output does
include p-values?
Thanks in advance,
Celso
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2000 Jan 10
2
lm methods inconsistency?
I'm very new to R so maybe i'm doing something wrong so
please let me know it that is that case.
Here is an example where the summary() and residuals()
applied to lm object produce different results
(I think the residuals() results is correct since SAS produces
those numbers - the second residual corresponding to observation
with weight 4 is wrong in summary()).
x <- c( 10, 20, 30, 40
2006 Apr 07
8
Why Ruby on Rails won''t become mainstream
Why Ruby on Rails won''t become mainstream
http://beust.com/weblog/archives/000382.html
Kind of interesting, but didn''t convince me. Though, yeah, I can imagine
a lot of naive programmers sticking with PHP and VB (the type of crowd
that also doesn''t run their own servers, so they''re dependent on hosts
offering Rails for them). Rails DOES have an IDE - soon