search for: suexecs

> On 7/13/20 6:40 PM, Emmett Culley via CentOS wrote: >> I need to set the umask for apache to 002.? I've tried every idea I've >> found on the internet, but nothing make a difference.? Most suggest that >> I put "umask 002" in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, but that doesn't seem to make >> a difference.? Other's suggest adding something to the

> On 7/19/20 10:41 PM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: >>> On 7/13/20 6:40 PM, Emmett Culley via CentOS wrote: >>>> I need to set the umask for apache to 002.? I've tried every idea I've >>>> found on the internet, but nothing make a difference.? Most suggest >>>> that >>>> I put "umask 002" in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, but

Hello CentOS, I don't usually use RPM's for apache, but I'm playing with a centos 4.2 w/apache and suexec. I've got the suexec apache RPM installed, but I'm not sure how to actually get apache to use it. The /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf does show it in the modules: LoadModule suexec_module modules/mod_suexec.so but httpd -l doesn't list suexec as being loaded. I'm

I need to set the umask for apache to 002. I've tried every idea I've found on the internet, but nothing make a difference. Most suggest that I put "umask 002" in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, but that doesn't seem to make a difference. Other's suggest adding something to the httpd.service script for systemd. And that doesn't make any difference. Any suggestion from

I have a number of vhosts configured with SuexecUserGroup to run the scripts with limited privileges and the dept. web-site on one of them. The problem is the webmaster can't read online context help which comes with the cms the site is using. Most help files (>2K) have *.php.html extension. *.php and *.html scripts both work as I suspect they should, but when it comes to *.php.html suexec

On 7/13/20 6:40 PM, Emmett Culley via CentOS wrote: > I need to set the umask for apache to 002.? I've tried every idea I've found on the internet, but nothing make a difference.? Most suggest that I put "umask 002" in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, but that doesn't seem to make a difference.? Other's suggest adding something to the httpd.service script for systemd.? And that

On 7/19/20 10:41 PM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: >> On 7/13/20 6:40 PM, Emmett Culley via CentOS wrote: >>> I need to set the umask for apache to 002.? I've tried every idea I've >>> found on the internet, but nothing make a difference.? Most suggest that >>> I put "umask 002" in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, but that doesn't seem to make

On 7/21/20 9:59 AM, Simon Matter wrote: >> On 7/19/20 10:41 PM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: >>>> On 7/13/20 6:40 PM, Emmett Culley via CentOS wrote: >>>>> I need to set the umask for apache to 002.? I've tried every idea I've >>>>> found on the internet, but nothing make a difference.? Most suggest >>>>> that

I''ve posted my experiences getting Rails running under CGI on a shared host that has suEXEC enabled on the wiki ( http://wiki.rubyonrails.org/rails/pages/RailsAndSuExec). I''m curious if anyone else has dealt with Rails and suEXEC before, and if so what approach they took. Avdi Grimm -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, I have read: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2005-March/003429.html, http://fedora.redhat.com/docs/selinux-apache-fc3/sn-using-other-types.html RedHat Selinux Documentation (PDF) (some parts) and they helped me solve a some difficulties, including the necessity to mount /var/www with -o suid. Now I'm getting these 2 errors in /var/log/messages whenever I execute a cgi:

I recently switched from Mandrake to Redhat and I noticed that vmail.cgi does not work with the default apache installation that comes with Redhat. Here is what I get in my error logs: [Thu Dec 04 11:59:57 2003] [notice] suEXEC mechanism enabled (wrapper: /usr/sbin/suexec) [Thu Dec 04 11:59:58 2003] [notice] Digest: generating secret for digest authentication ... [Thu Dec 04 11:59:58 2003]

I recently moved BackupPC from CentOS-6 to CentOS-7. But when I browse to localhost/BackupPC I'm told Error: Wrong user: my userid is 48[apache], instead of 984(backuppc) As far as I can tell, the BackupPC settings are exactly the same as they were before the move. It seems htttpd is running the program as user apache rather than backuppc, as required. Is there a simple setting in

I am trying to build an RPM for Apache-2.4.7-1 on Centos-6.5-i86_64. I am using mock. The are three build dependencies that I am trying to resolve. One, mod_socache_dc / distcache, I have simply removed from the spec file. The other two are arp and apr-utils. Since httpd-2.4.7 needs arp >= 1.4 I got the two latter requirements from http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/httpd-2.4.7-deps.tar.bz2

Basically, the way puppet installs things things with /usr/bin/apt-get -q -y -o DPkg::Options::=--force-confold install <package_name> fails due to authentication WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated But if I do it from an ssh console normally, using apt-get install <package_name> it works fine without issues. Is there a way to change how puppet uses the

I''m running rails on RedHat ES3 managed by Plesk with Apache/FastCGI. I''ve followed the directions here: http://wiki.rubyonrails.com/rails/pages/HowtoInstallAndRunRubyOnRailsOnPlesk And got everything working, but my application refuses to run in Production mode. It runs in development mode despite the fact that I''ve set: FastCgiServer

Not sure where to start on this. I went to examine a log file today and noticed a password protected internal file was being accessed from 16.0.0.0. Upon further review every log entry has the same IP. Accessing apache from localhost also reports 16.0.0.0. Google is not being my friend right now, any advice? Kernel: 2.6.9-89.0.29.Elsmp In the chroot: httpd-suexec-2.0.52-41.ent.7.centos4

Hi I am trying to get httpd onto a freshly updated, although long time ago installed CentOS 4 box. Its fully updated to 4.7 however when trying to install httpd this is the error i get, well i should say install is fine but httpd cant start. # yum install httpd -- snip -- Dependencies Resolved ============================================================================= Package

On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Lucian <lucian at lastdot.org> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 2:22 AM, Trey Dockendorf <treydock at gmail.com> > wrote: > > I had a recent request to improve security on my web servers by having > each > > website use a different user to run the hosting service. So > > example1.comhas it's own Apache instance running

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

All, There are 3 bugfix updates for CentOS-4 (RC1). 1. mod_perl needed to be recompiled after the RH errata for perl was incorporated, but it was not flagged by the perl update. ( https://bugzilla.caosity.org/show_bug.cgi?id=803 ) (thanks Joshua Hirsh) 2. httpd identified itself as Apache/2.0.52 (Red Hat) Server instead of CentOS ( https://bugzilla.caosity.org/show_bug.cgi?id=806 ) (thanks