search for: suexec

...I put "umask 002" in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, but that doesn't seem to make >> a difference.? Other's suggest adding something to the httpd.service >> script for systemd.? And that doesn't make any difference. > > I had a couple sideline emails with Emmett about suexec possibly being the > culprit.? TL;DR: that's not it. > > The apache suexec utility can enforce a umask (typically 022) on CGI and > SSI (server-side includes).? Taking a look at the source in > support/suexec.c, if compiled with AP_SUEXEC_UMASK set to some value, it > will set...

...pd, but that doesn't seem to >>>> make >>>> a difference.? Other's suggest adding something to the httpd.service >>>> script for systemd.? And that doesn't make any difference. >>> >>> I had a couple sideline emails with Emmett about suexec possibly being >>> the >>> culprit.? TL;DR: that's not it. >>> >>> The apache suexec utility can enforce a umask (typically 022) on CGI >>> and >>> SSI (server-side includes).? Taking a look at the source in >>> support/suexec.c, if...

Hello CentOS, I don't usually use RPM's for apache, but I'm playing with a centos 4.2 w/apache and suexec. I've got the suexec apache RPM installed, but I'm not sure how to actually get apache to use it. The /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf does show it in the modules: LoadModule suexec_module modules/mod_suexec.so but httpd -l doesn't list suexec as being loaded. I'm sure it's simple...

I need to set the umask for apache to 002. I've tried every idea I've found on the internet, but nothing make a difference. Most suggest that I put "umask 002" in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, but that doesn't seem to make a difference. Other's suggest adding something to the httpd.service script for systemd. And that doesn't make any difference. Any suggestion from

I have a number of vhosts configured with SuexecUserGroup to run the scripts with limited privileges and the dept. web-site on one of them. The problem is the webmaster can't read online context help which comes with the cms the site is using. Most help files (>2K) have *.php.html extension. *.php and *.html scripts both work as I suspect...

...erence.? Most suggest that I put "umask 002" in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, but that doesn't seem to make a difference.? Other's suggest adding something to the httpd.service script for systemd.? And that doesn't make any difference. I had a couple sideline emails with Emmett about suexec possibly being the culprit.? TL;DR: that's not it. The apache suexec utility can enforce a umask (typically 022) on CGI and SSI (server-side includes).? Taking a look at the source in support/suexec.c, if compiled with AP_SUEXEC_UMASK set to some value, it will set the umask; else there is no...

...k 002" in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, but that doesn't seem to make >>> a difference.? Other's suggest adding something to the httpd.service >>> script for systemd.? And that doesn't make any difference. >> >> I had a couple sideline emails with Emmett about suexec possibly being the >> culprit.? TL;DR: that's not it. >> >> The apache suexec utility can enforce a umask (typically 022) on CGI and >> SSI (server-side includes).? Taking a look at the source in >> support/suexec.c, if compiled with AP_SUEXEC_UMASK set to some val...

...39;t seem to >>>>> make >>>>> a difference.? Other's suggest adding something to the httpd.service >>>>> script for systemd.? And that doesn't make any difference. >>>> >>>> I had a couple sideline emails with Emmett about suexec possibly being >>>> the >>>> culprit.? TL;DR: that's not it. >>>> >>>> The apache suexec utility can enforce a umask (typically 022) on CGI >>>> and >>>> SSI (server-side includes).? Taking a look at the source in >>&...

I''ve posted my experiences getting Rails running under CGI on a shared host that has suEXEC enabled on the wiki ( http://wiki.rubyonrails.org/rails/pages/RailsAndSuExec). I''m curious if anyone else has dealt with Rails and suEXEC before, and if so what approach they took. Avdi Grimm -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rub...

...cumentation (PDF) (some parts) and they helped me solve a some difficulties, including the necessity to mount /var/www with -o suid. Now I'm getting these 2 errors in /var/log/messages whenever I execute a cgi: %-------------------------- avc: denied { create } for pid=17995 comm="suexec" scontext=root:system_r:httpd_suexec_t tcontext=root:system_r:httpd_suexec_t tclass=netlink_route_socket avc: denied { read } for pid=17995 comm="suexec" name="cert.pem" dev=dm-0 ino=520402 scontext=root:system_r:httpd_suexec_t tcontext=system_u:object_r:usr_t tclass=ln...

I recently switched from Mandrake to Redhat and I noticed that vmail.cgi does not work with the default apache installation that comes with Redhat. Here is what I get in my error logs: [Thu Dec 04 11:59:57 2003] [notice] suEXEC mechanism enabled (wrapper: /usr/sbin/suexec) [Thu Dec 04 11:59:58 2003] [notice] Digest: generating secret for digest authentication ... [Thu Dec 04 11:59:58 2003] [notice] Digest: done [Thu Dec 04 11:59:59 2003] [notice] Apache/2.0.40 (Red Hat Linux) configured -- resuming normal operations [Thu...

I recently moved BackupPC from CentOS-6 to CentOS-7. But when I browse to localhost/BackupPC I'm told Error: Wrong user: my userid is 48[apache], instead of 984(backuppc) As far as I can tell, the BackupPC settings are exactly the same as they were before the move. It seems htttpd is running the program as user apache rather than backuppc, as required. Is there a simple setting in

...that I need some help with the spec file to get past this problem. The spec is provided below and I would be grateful if anyone could help me out with this. I am sure others would find the information useful as well. Thanks. <--- rpmbuild/SPECS/httpd.spec %define contentdir /var/www %define suexec_caller apache %define mmn 20120211 Summary: Apache HTTP Server Name: httpd Version: 2.4.7 Release: 1 URL: http://httpd.apache.org/ Vendor: Apache Software Foundation Source0: http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/httpd-%{version}.tar.bz2 Source1: http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/httpd-%{version}-deps.t...

...llowing extra packages will be installed: apache2-mpm-prefork apache2-utils apache2.2-bin apache2.2-common libapache2-mod-php5 libapr1 libaprutil1 libaprutil1-dbd-sqlite3 libaprutil1-ldap libonig2 libqdbm14 php5-cli php5-common php5-suhosin ssl-cert Suggested packages: apache2-doc apache2-suexec apache2-suexec-custom php-pear openssl-blacklist The following NEW packages will be installed: apache2-mpm-prefork apache2-utils apache2.2-bin apache2.2-common libapache2-mod-php5 libapr1 libaprutil1 libaprutil1-dbd-sqlite3 libaprutil1-ldap libonig2 libqdbm14 php5 php5-cli php5-common php5-s...

I''m running rails on RedHat ES3 managed by Plesk with Apache/FastCGI. I''ve followed the directions here: http://wiki.rubyonrails.com/rails/pages/HowtoInstallAndRunRubyOnRailsOnPlesk And got everything working, but my application refuses to run in Production mode. It runs in development mode despite the fact that I''ve set: FastCgiServer

...oday and noticed a password protected internal file was being accessed from 16.0.0.0. Upon further review every log entry has the same IP. Accessing apache from localhost also reports 16.0.0.0. Google is not being my friend right now, any advice? Kernel: 2.6.9-89.0.29.Elsmp In the chroot: httpd-suexec-2.0.52-41.ent.7.centos4 httpd-devel-2.0.52-41.ent.7.centos4 httpd-2.0.52-41.ent.7.centos4 -jason -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us...

...============= Installing: httpd i386 2.0.52-41.ent.centos4 base 902 k Installing for dependencies: apr i386 0.9.4-24.9 base 93 k apr-util i386 0.9.4-22.el4 base 51 k httpd-suexec i386 2.0.52-41.ent.centos4 base 30 k Transaction Summary ============================================================================= Install 4 Package(s) Update 0 Package(s) Remove 0 Package(s) Total download size: 1.1 M I...

...be managed by the same > CMS > > and code base. So with that being the case, I don't see how this is > > possible. Any ideas or insight are very welcome. > > Is there a specific requirement to run different http servers? Because > if there is not then you can just use Suexec+fastcgi. > Otherwise, just use Apache to proxy stuff to backend servers (can be > anything from apache to nginx). > > HTH > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > I...

...The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ia64: updates/ia64/RPMS/httpd-2.0.52-38.ent.centos4.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/httpd-devel-2.0.52-38.ent.centos4.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/httpd-manual-2.0.52-38.ent.centos4.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/httpd-suexec-2.0.52-38.ent.centos4.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/mod_ssl-2.0.52-38.ent.centos4.ia64.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - upi at iki.fi - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pg...

...ow_bug.cgi? id=805 ) (thanks xspace) The following updated files are pushed to beta.centos.org and should be available by using the command: yum upgrade Filelist: httpd-2.0.52-9.ent.centos4.1.i386.rpm httpd-devel-2.0.52-9.ent.centos4.1.i386.rpm httpd-manual-2.0.52-9.ent.centos4.1.i386.rpm httpd-suexec-2.0.52-9.ent.centos4.1.i386.rpm mod_perl-1.99_16-4.centos4.i386.rpm mod_perl-devel-1.99_16-4.centos4.i386.rpm mod_ssl-2.0.52-9.ent.centos4.1.i386.rpm up2date-4.4.5-1.centos4.1.i386.rpm up2date-gnome-4.4.5-1.centos4.1.i386.rpm -- Johnny Hughes <http://www.HughesJR.com/>