search for: succint

I am using rails edge. I am using gem "rspec-rails", "= 2.0.0.beta. 19" . I have following code at spec/models/user_spec.rb require ''spec_helper'' describe User do it { should validate_presence_of(:email) } it { should validate_presence_of(:name) } end Here is my gemfile group :development, :test do gem ''factory_girl_rails'',

That probably isn''t the right title for this topic, but I''m not sure how else to explain in succintly. I''m sorry if this is obvious but I couldn''t find the answer in the Ruby/Rails docs. How do I use a variable as a substitute for a method/field, so that I can call the object with the variable that contains the method name. For example, say I have the object Product, that ha...

...y for [at least] the optimizations you mentioned. But this is different from what I have in mind. Basically, the plan is to perform analysis and some optimizations before procedurization, and do the rest (including loop restructuring) after it. This is not mentioned in the proposal (we tried to be succint -- only 20 pages long! :-)), but explained in detail in [Tian05] (sorry, the link in the proposal doesn't lead you directly to pdf file; use this one instead: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.97.3763&rep=rep1&type=pdf). Yours, Andrey

...But this is different from what I have in mind. Basically, the plan > > is > > to perform analysis and some optimizations before procedurization, > > and > > do the rest (including loop restructuring) after it. This is not > > mentioned in the proposal (we tried to be succint -- only 20 pages > > long! :-)), but explained in detail in [Tian05] (sorry, the link in > > the proposal doesn't lead you directly to pdf file; use this one > > instead: > > http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.97.3763&rep=rep1&type=pdf). &gt...

...and the number of git discussions that have come before this. He convinced me to make the effort to put my 2 cents in though - thanks Chris. I am also having issues attempting to follow this thread (it is huge and filled with... distractions). I would appreciate it if someone would put together a succint proposal that strips out the rest of the thread (unless I have missed it). This would help to center the discussion and involve more people in the discussion. From a quick skim, it definitely seems like this whole proposal is about optimizing for a specific use-case, producing a clang based toolch...

...you mentioned. > > But this is different from what I have in mind. Basically, the plan > is > to perform analysis and some optimizations before procedurization, > and > do the rest (including loop restructuring) after it. This is not > mentioned in the proposal (we tried to be succint -- only 20 pages > long! :-)), but explained in detail in [Tian05] (sorry, the link in > the proposal doesn't lead you directly to pdf file; use this one > instead: > http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.97.3763&rep=rep1&type=pdf). With regard to what yo...

...nt from what I have in mind. Basically, the plan >> > is >> > to perform analysis and some optimizations before procedurization, >> > and >> > do the rest (including loop restructuring) after it. This is not >> > mentioned in the proposal (we tried to be succint -- only 20 pages >> > long! :-)), but explained in detail in [Tian05] (sorry, the link in >> > the proposal doesn't lead you directly to pdf file; use this one >> > instead: >> > http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.97.3763&rep=rep1&am...

mark at ohprs.org > My last message probably contained too much information. This one is more succient. "Succint" may not be the right adjective, because I think this is the third copy I've seen. > Here is the dovecot log when user dsmith attempts to connect to dovecot > from the Tbird client: What I see is ... > Jul 11 19:29:46 imap-login: Info: Disconnected (no auth attempts in 3 secs):...

...batches the calls for efficiency so that the exact request parameters are not known on each invokation, and the particular test wants to be independent of the batching parameters. Other cases might be that the number of possible return values is large given the inputs and can be expressed more succintly as a simple formula on the paramteters. Or the input and output must be ordered data but the order is not known or arbitrarily set by an intermediate component (e.g. a database). Or is there some other way that we are missing? thanks for elucidating us and for the great work on this libra...

I am trying to fit a nonlinear regression model to data. There are several predictor variables and 8 parameters. I will write the model as Y ~ Yhat(theta1,...,theta8) OK, I can do this using nls() - but "only just" as there are not as many observations as might be desired. Now the problem is that we have a factor "Site" and I want to include a corresponding error

class User end class Agent < User end script/console production User.find_by_name ''john'' SELECT "people".* FROM "people" WHERE ((("people"."type" = ''User'' OR "people"."type" = ''Manager'') OR "people"."type" = ''Agent'')) AND

I have an model Order and a model Customer. Each customer has_many Orders. Each Order belongs_to a Customer. If I create an order but don''t specify a Customer (for whatever reason, maybe it''s unknown at the time).. I obviously can''t access @order.customer.name because I''ll get a nil error... So what''s the right way to handle that? If the Customer is

Hi, I sometimes play around with extreme parameters for distributions and found that qbeta is not always monotone as the following example shows. I don't know whether this is serious enough to submit a bug report (as this example is near to the limitations of floating point arithmetic). Josef > x <- qbeta((0:100)/100,0.01,5) > x [1] 0.000000e+00 1.253990e-201 1.589622e-171

On Mon, 20 Oct 1997, Dieter Rothacker wrote: > Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > > > > Here is the smb.conf of the disappeared samba box: > > ^^^^^^^^^^^ > I do not think THIS computer should become local master !? > (see below) > > > > wins support = no > > > workgroup = WORKGROUP > > >

Hello, After poking and prodding at Asterisk and Zaptel for over a couple years now, I've dedicated some time to actually reading the code and trying to figure it out. It's been fascinating. With the driver source on one part of the screen and a pdf of "Linux Device Drivers" on another part I've aquainted myself with device driver programming and the interesting

...68816b4c0606091102y5bd2ec37ya5c1fb690f31f248@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed On 6/9/06, zero halo <zerohalo@gmail.com> wrote: > That probably isn''t the right title for this topic, but I''m not sure how > else to explain in succintly. I''m sorry if this is obvious but I > couldn''t find the answer in the Ruby/Rails docs. > > How do I use a variable as a substitute for a method/field, so that I > can call the object with the variable that contains the method name. Generally it''s done by o...

Andrey, While I think that it will be relatively easy to have the intrinsics serve as code-motion barriers for other code that might be threads sensitive (like other external function calls), we would need to think through exactly how this would work. The easiest thing would be to make the intrinsics have having unmodeled side effects, although we might want to do something more intelligent.

Hi All, We'd like to make a proposal for OpenMP representation in LLVM IR. Our goal is to reach an agreement in the community on a simple, complete and extensible representation of OpenMP language constructs in LLVM IR. Hopefully, this would serve as a common ground and would enable further development of OpenMP support both in Clang and LLVM compiler toolchain. We seek feedback on the

Hi Duncan, > […] > 2. Those working on projects *outside* the monolithic repo will get the downsides of both: a monolithic repo that they are only using parts of, and multiple repos that are somehow version-locked. > > 3. For many (most?) developers, changing to a monolithic git repo is a *bigger* workflow change than switching to separate git repos. Many people (and at least some