search for: successivament

Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "successivament".

Did you mean: successivamente
2016 Jan 23
1
Persistent tun/tap
It is possible for tinc to made a persistent tun/tap or can I configure a persistent tun/tap by hand and tell to tinc to use that virtual interface device without starting up/shutting down tun/tap at every tincd start/stop ? Roberto -------------- parte successiva -------------- Un allegato HTML ? stato rimosso... URL:
2016 Jan 27
0
HA firewall with tinc
I think it should work at least for TUN virtual interface as TUn works at IP level. This is a sample configuration. firewall1 lan = 172.16.1.11/19 (ALWAYS ACTIVE) - "Physical Network Interface" - system config as ifcfg-... 172.16.1.10/19 (VIP Keepalived Make active) - Active/Passive configuration with firewall2 firewall1 vpndr1
2016 Feb 08
0
tinc ha
I need a second tinc vpn server (physical machine) to be up and running, so if first tinc vpn server (virtual machine) goes down we can connect to remote site to do management (remote site is not isolated). If I use 2 different tinc vpn servers on the remote sites all two connected to primary tinc sites (HQ Site), can I have a robust solution, using some route prioritization with ip route ? so I
2016 Jan 22
1
un/Tap IP Configuration
I read tinc documentation part: " For Branch A BranchA would be configured like this: In /etc/tinc/company/tinc-up: # Real interface of internal network: # ifconfig eth0 10.1.54.1 netmask 255.255.0.0 ifconfig $INTERFACE 10.1.54.1 netmask 255.0.0.0 ... Note that the IP addresses of eth0 and tap0 are the same. This is quite possible, if you make sure that the netmasks of the
2016 Jan 22
1
tinc with ha firewall
Hi, I have HA firewalls configuration (keepalived) on one site. Each firewall has its own IP and a Virtual IP (VIP) that keepalived activate on one of the firewall (active/passive HA configuration). I think I can set all two firewalls with same configuration, generating key pairs on one firewall and copying that to the second, so the remote host can see always one of the other firewall as the
2016 Jan 22
1
Error starting tinc
I get this error starting tincd: tincd -n vpndr -d5 -D tincd 1.0.26 (Jan 22 2016 19:28:17) starting, debug level 5 /dev/net/tun is a Linux tun/tap device (tun mode) Executing script tinc-up System call `getaddrinfo' failed: Name or service not known Terminating Also keepalived return an error when tincd start. Starting as a daemon. Joutnalctl show this: Jan 22 23:14:49 systemd[1]:
2015 Jan 25
1
tinc Digest, Vol 123, Issue 13
Lastest Modifications: HOST A: Removed 2 route add as you suggested, and it's still working. HOST B: This host has a openwrt as gateway and I added few days ago as you suggested on freenode and this is HOST B Gateway route Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG 10 0
2015 Jan 22
1
Help linking subnets
Hi, after trying for days I ended up with a working tinc configurazion of 2 subnets, now my goal is to add 2 more subnets and comunicate. I might seem dumb at this point but honestly I don't work in IT or Networking stuff, and so I dont have that deep knowledge. A little explanation of my configuration is HOST A (VPN server) Public IP: 1.2.3.4 tun0 Subnet = 192.168.10.0/24 tun0 IP =
2016 Jan 27
6
HA firewall with tinc
I have 2 firewall in HA with keepalived. Can I use active the same tinc configuration on 2 firewalls ? using tun Interface with same ip on all 2 nodes is a problem ? tun device advertise itself on the network having an IP/MAC pairs (ARP) or the IP is only used by the system internally for routing so using the same configuration is right ? so one firewall be active, the other is passive. With this
2016 Jan 27
0
HA firewall with tinc
Hi Saverio, I found conflict: 172.16.1.10 00:50:56:1b:ba:5e VMware, Inc. 172.16.1.10 00:50:56:2b:12:e6 VMware, Inc. (DUP: 2) 172.16.1.10 00:50:56:2b:12:e6 VMware, Inc. (DUP: 3) 172.16.1.10 00:50:56:2b:12:e6 VMware, Inc. (DUP: 4) 172.16.1.10 00:50:56:2b:12:e6 VMware, Inc. (DUP: 5) So my assumptions were wrong ! :D Probably Virtual
2015 Jan 24
1
tinc Digest, Vol 123, Issue 11
Hi, Thank you Guus, I think the /16 solution is the easier to apply so I modified my tinc-up in host A to be like #!/bin/sh ifconfig $INTERFACE 192.168.10.1 netmask 255.255.0.0 a route -a from HOST A shows: Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 0.0.0.0 178.62.128.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 10.129.0.0