search for: substate

...; Actually, gcc is wrong and VC++ got it right. From the C++ standard, 6.4p3: > A name introduced by a declaration in a condition (either introduced > by the type-specifier-seq or the declarator of the > condition) is in scope from its point of declaration until the end of > the substatements controlled by the condition. If the > name is re-declared in the outermost block of a substatement > controlled by the condition, the declaration that re-declares > the name is ill-formed. Which gives us: while (int x=0) { int x=0; // error: redeclaration, clashes with condit...

Brian Ripley recently replied to a comment of mine by referring to a function 'assignInNamespace', which I had not heard of. Is there a good write up on name spaces in R? There are little tidbits in the manuals on the R site, but I found nothing substative. I'd like to understand these better. Terry Therneau

gcc is correct. According to the ISO specification, the for-init-statement is supposed to inject any variable names into the same declarative scope as the condition of an equivalent restructuring of the loop in the form of a while statement, which in turn fronts the declaration to an extra scope that surrounds the /entire/ loop construct. VC++ seems to be scoping the variables as if they were

Hello fellow R people, I can not figure out a pretty way to use strplit with vectors Imagine that I got the following data from someone with ID's representing several factors ID data A1-B1-t1 0 A1-B1-t2 1 A1-B2-t1 5 A1-B2-t2 10 A1-B10-t1 0 A1-B10-t2 1 A1-B20-t1 5 A1-B20-t2 10 ... I would like to turn this dataframe to station substation time data A1 B1 t1 0 A1 B1 t2 1 A1 B2 t1 5

hi, I need some feedback on an asterisk installation my company is planning to supply. Here's the basic structure: PSTN -> Asterisk -> Channel Bank -> SDH --- fiber --- SDH -> analog extension Some additional info: 1) Fiber connects the main exchange with 8 other substations, with an average distance of 13 or so kilometers between each station. 2) Channel bank needs to connect

...wrong and VC++ got it right. > From the C++ standard, 6.4p3: > >> A name introduced by a declaration in a condition (either introduced >> by the type-specifier-seq or the declarator of the >> condition) is in scope from its point of declaration until the end of >> the substatements controlled by the condition. If the >> name is re-declared in the outermost block of a substatement >> controlled by the condition, the declaration that re-declares >> the name is ill-formed. > > Which gives us: > > while (int x=0) { > int x=0; // error: r...

...g and VC++ got it right. > From the C++ standard, 6.4p3: > > > A name introduced by a declaration in a condition (either introduced > > by the type-specifier-seq or the declarator of the > > condition) is in scope from its point of declaration until the end of > > the substatements controlled by the condition. If the > > name is re-declared in the outermost block of a substatement > > controlled by the condition, the declaration that re-declares > > the name is ill-formed. > > Which gives us: > > while (int x=0) { > int x=0; // error...

Taken from tools/llvmc2/CompilationGraph.cpp: ... for (typename C::const_iterator B = EdgesContainer.begin(), E = EdgesContainer.end(); B != E; ++B) { const Edge* E = B->getPtr(); ... MS C++ compiler (VS 2008) gives: ... CompilationGraph.cpp ..\..\..\llvm\tools\llvmc2\CompilationGraph.cpp(58) : error C2371: 'E' : redefinition; different basic types

1: x86/mwait_idle: remove assumption of one C-state per MWAIT flag 2: x86/mwait_idle: export both C1 and C1E 3: x86/mwait_idle: initial C8, C9, C10 support Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>

Hi, can someone explain the states shown by the ''xm list'' command? ''r'' (running) - The domain is currently running. - This flag is always shown for the Domain 0, but never for unprivileged domains, why? ''b'' (blocked) - The domain is blocked. - What does that mean? Why should a domain be blocked? ''p'' (paused) - The domain

Greetings all; I expect that I may not have the shutdown properly configured, but my site was subjected to some bad weather related intermittent power losses a week+ back, and I have an automatic standby plant, a 20kw, that usuall fires up and has the lights back on in 7 or 8 seconds. So while the power folks were reclosing substation breakers to see where the next tree limb was shorting

...> They almost are, but the rules for while statements actually force the > declaration outside of the condition of the if statement. > Again, see the 6.4p2 reference. 'while' statements should also follow this rule: > If the name is re-declared in the outermost block of a substatement > controlled by the condition, the declaration that re-declares the name > is ill-formed. gcc correctly scopes the declaration inside the while statement: while (int x=0) { int x=0; // error: redeclaration. } -Argiris > You are correct, though, that gcc should be emitting a...

...askable- 64bit- Capabilities: [90] Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Sunrise Point-LP PCI Express Root Port [1043:1a00] Capabilities: [a0] Power Management version 3 Capabilities: [100] Advanced Error Reporting Capabilities: [140] Access Control Services Capabilities: [200] L1 PM Substates Capabilities: [220] #19 Kernel driver in use: pcieport The really weird thing here is that the workaround register PCI_PREF_BASE_UPPER32 already appears to have value 0, as shown above and also verified during resume. But simply writing value 0 again definitely results in all the problems...

...Capabilities: [60] Power Management version 3 Capabilities: [68] MSI: Enable+ Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit+ Capabilities: [78] Express Endpoint, MSI 00 Capabilities: [100] Virtual Channel Capabilities: [250] Latency Tolerance Reporting Capabilities: [258] L1 PM Substates Capabilities: [128] Power Budgeting <?> Capabilities: [600] Vendor Specific Information: ID=0001 Rev=1 Len=024 <?> Capabilities: [900] #19 Kernel driver in use: nouveau Kernel modules: nouveau -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the...

...t_recdinvite_new_message Jan 9 17:20:39: CCSIP-SPI-CONTROL: Clock Time Zone is UTC, same as GMT: Using GMT Jan 9 17:20:39: sip_stats_method Jan 9 17:20:39: ccsip_set_release_source_for_peer:ownCallId[1132803], src[2] Jan 9 17:20:39: 0x642D4630 : State change from (STATE_RECD_INVITE, SUBSTATE_NONE) to (STATE_DISCONNECTING, SUBSTATE_NONE) Jan 9 17:20:39: Queued event from SIP SPI : SIPSPI_EV_SEND_MESSAGE Jan 9 17:20:39: sip_stats_status_code Jan 9 17:20:39: CCSIP-SPI-CONTROL: sipSPISendInviteResponse Jan 9 17:20:39: Queued event from SIP SPI : SIPSPI_EV_SEND_MESSAGE Jan 9 17:20:...

Greetings all; I expect that I may not have the shutdown properly configured, but my site was subjected to some bad weather related intermittent power losses a week+ back, and I have an automatic standby plant, a 20kw, that usuall fires up and has the lights back on in 7 or 8 seconds. So while the power folks were reclosing substation breakers to see where the next tree limb was shorting

I?m looking to install a couple of SIP phones into a small/medium company. The easiest way would be to simply add the phones on the LAN network. But what would happened if someone make a huge file transfer: will it make trouble on the Sip connections ? I think so, that?s why I?m asking you if there is a good (better) way? Maybe connect SIP phones on a separate network and setup a linux box as

...Capabilities: [60] Power Management version 3 Capabilities: [68] MSI: Enable- Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit+ Capabilities: [78] Express Endpoint, MSI 00 Capabilities: [100] Virtual Channel Capabilities: [250] Latency Tolerance Reporting Capabilities: [258] L1 PM Substates Capabilities: [128] Power Budgeting <?> Capabilities: [420] Advanced Error Reporting Capabilities: [600] Vendor Specific Information: ID=0001 Rev=1 Len=024 <?> Capabilities: [900] #19 Kernel modules: nouveau I must admit that this is new to me!...

Greetings all; Is it possible to set a logging option in one of the config files so that when we have a 1 second power bump, the date is included, both in the log, and in the -wall broadcast? We apparently have a substation regulator in the process of failing, and the recycle isn't normally slow enough to reset the clocks, but it killing one of my computers w/o actually causing a reboot.

...ilities: [90] Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Sunrise > Point-LP PCI Express Root Port [1043:1a00] > Capabilities: [a0] Power Management version 3 > Capabilities: [100] Advanced Error Reporting > Capabilities: [140] Access Control Services > Capabilities: [200] L1 PM Substates > Capabilities: [220] #19 > Kernel driver in use: pcieport > > The really weird thing here is that the workaround register > PCI_PREF_BASE_UPPER32 already appears to have value 0, as shown above > and also verified during resume. But simply writing value 0 again > def...