search for: subfe

Hi all, I'm hoping someone could tell me what best practices are as far as keeping programs organized in R. In most languages, I like to keep things organized by writing small functions. So, suppose I want to write a function that would require helper functions or would just be too big to write in one piece. Below are three ways to do this: ################### Style 1 (C-style)

I've "group" namespace and b2b mailbox under it. I'm unable to subscribe to it and deliver emails there. Here is my problem: if I create subfolder (lets name it "subf") under b2b mailbox I'm unable to subscribe to it until acl plugin is enabled. Even if I put dovecot-acl file in .b2b.subf folder with anyone full rights dovecot-acl-list doesn't get populated

Hi I am trying to modify the llc in that way: subf 3, 5, 3 subf 3, 5, 3 stw 3, 44(1) stw 3, 44(1) # InlineAsm Start --> isync

On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Michael Graumann<MichaelGraumann at gmx.net> wrote: > Hi > > I am trying to modify the llc in that way: > > > >         subf 3, 5, 3                                 subf 3, 5, 3 > >         stw 3, 44(1)                                stw 3, 44(1) > >                                                                # InlineAsm

When I do a wineprefixcreate, it creates all my "drives" in the dosdevices directory. I had a few questions about those files that it creates. 1) it creates two entries for most of my devices For example: e: -> /media/cdrom e:: -> /dev/cdrom What does the entry with the two colons (::) tell Wine? 2) Is there a particular reason that certain drive letters are used? Have

?s 23:06 de 25/07/2023, Bob Green escreveu: > Hello, > > I am seeking advice as to how I can download the 833 files from this > site:"http://home.brisnet.org.au/~bgreen/Data/" > > I want to be able to download them to perform a textual analysis. > > If the 833 files, which are in a Directory with two subfolders were on > my computer I could read them

Here''s the latest USB code against the xen 3.0.0 release. Since the last posting this version updates the code to use the new 32 bit grant references and the latest GNTTABOP_map_grant_ref definition. I''ve also changed the definition of the virtual USB HCD to have a single port rather than seven ports with six unused. Domains importing multiple USB devices will get a HCD for

Ok :-) und how can I add inlined assembly to the output? - Michael -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] Im Auftrag von Bill Wendling Gesendet: Dienstag, 30. Juni 2009 19:16 An: LLVM Developers Mailing List Betreff: Re: [LLVMdev] modifying llc asm output On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Michael Graumann<MichaelGraumann

When I attmept to mount a PC (W2K) share via my fstab, I get the following error message on the mount: "Unknown parameter encountered 'file'" Truth be told , samba is becoming more and more frustrating. The only thing I have been able to successfully do is to make visible my NFS mount point across my file server to my W2K machine. I am running SuSE 9.1, Samba 3.02a Enclosed is

Dear statistician experts, Sorry if this is a trivial question, or the old same question (i don't know what is the efficient key word for this issue). In order to understand the calculation of parameter of logistic regression, I did an exercise through spreadsheet following the procedural example from a literature, or the available spreadsheet (with calculation formula). I ended up with

Hi, I was hoping you could provide me with some pointers on how to get started adding some features to dovecot. What I am trying to do is add an optional publish mechanism, that would publish a list of events as they occur, so that an external program could read these events and do "something". These events would be "Add", "Delete", "Move" - these

Dear guys, I am having problem to split edges correctly. Mostly because the new basic blocks are creating infinite loops. Could someone help me fixing the code below? It is creating assembly like this one below. Block LBB1_9 was inserted to break the critical edge between blocks LBB1_3 and LBB1_8. But it changes the semantics of the original program, because, before, LBB1_8 was falling

Sadly the latest optimization broke completely everything. The asm code isn't gas compliant. the libFLAC linker script has a typo, disabling the asm optimization and/or altivec won't let a correct build anyway. Instant fixes for the asm stuff: sed -i -e"s:;:\#:" on the lpc_asm.s to load address instead of addis+ori you could use lis and la and PLEASE use the @l(register)

I was trying to do liveness analysis on some code and I found that almost no variables were ever live on exit from any basic block. Looking into the matter, I saw that values almost always get stored at then end of a block and loaded again at the beginning of the next block. This occurs in both the intermediate representation and also in the final compiled code (I am using the PowerPC backend).

The problem is that you are inserting block 9 in the wrong spot. mf.getLastBlock() returns the block with the greatest number which may have nothing to do with the ordering. Why not use the end iterator (mf.end) to insert? -Tanya On Sat, 8 Jul 2006, Fernando Magno Quintao Pereira wrote: > > Dear guys, > > I am having problem to split edges correctly. Mostly because the new

...hortcirc_next_2E_11; } else { goto l13_UnifiedReturnBlock; } Basically it does that check and puts the result in l2_tmp_2E_182, then uses that in the if check and the ternary thing. When this is compiled, the assembly that it generates for that check/assignment is: subc r29, r25, r2 subfe r29,r29,r29 neg r29,r29 This is pretty slow compared to just doing the check on the fly (and being able to just use a compare instruction). If I manually edit the code to change it to: l13_shortcirc_next_2E_11: l8_chain_length_2E_039 = ((l8_tmp_2E_180 > l8_mem_tmp_2E_0) ? (4294967295u) :...

I've had this a long time but haven't submitted it yet. I've tried to mirror the ia32 setup, so there should be a new subdirectory src/libFLAC/ppc . The first two attachments go there. The third is a context diff for src/libFLAC/Makefile.am . I have some more modified files, which I figured I'd submit after the above are checked in and working for somebody other than me. If you

> If you don't want critical edges in the machine code CFG, you're going to > have to write a machine code CFG critical edge splitting pass: LLVM > doesn't currently have one. > > -Chris Hey guys, I've coded a pass to break the critical edges of the machine control flow graph. The program works fine, but I am sure it is not the right way of implementing it.

On Tue, 4 Jul 2006, Fernando Magno Quintao Pereira wrote: > However, it does not remove all the critical edges. I am getting a very > weird dataflow graph (even without the Break Critical edges pass). The > dataflow generated by MachineFunction::dump() for the program below is > given here: > http://compilers.cs.ucla.edu/fernando/projects/soc/images/loop_no_crit2.pdf ... > The

On Tue, 4 May 2004, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Tue, 4 May 2004, Chris Lattner wrote: > > I suspect that a large reason that LLVM does worst than a native C > > compiler with the CBE+GCC is that LLVM generates very low-level C code, > > and I'm not convinced that GCC is doing a very good job (ie, without > > syntactic loops). > > Yup, this is EXACTLY what is