search for: subf

...eep things organized by writing small functions. So, suppose I want to write a function that would require helper functions or would just be too big to write in one piece. Below are three ways to do this: ################### Style 1 (C-style) ############### Foo <- function(x) { .... } Foo.subf <- function(x, blah) { .... } Foo.subg <- function(x, bar) { .... } ################### Style 2 (Lispish?) ############## Foo <- function(x) { Subf <- function(blah) { .... } Subg <- function(bar) { .... } .... } ################### Object-Oriented ###########...

I've "group" namespace and b2b mailbox under it. I'm unable to subscribe to it and deliver emails there. Here is my problem: if I create subfolder (lets name it "subf") under b2b mailbox I'm unable to subscribe to it until acl plugin is enabled. Even if I put dovecot-acl file in .b2b.subf folder with anyone full rights dovecot-acl-list doesn't get populated with new subfoler. If I put it there manually I'm able to s...

Hi I am trying to modify the llc in that way: subf 3, 5, 3 subf 3, 5, 3 stw 3, 44(1) stw 3, 44(1) # InlineAsm Start --> isync...

On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Michael Graumann<MichaelGraumann at gmx.net> wrote: > Hi > > I am trying to modify the llc in that way: > > > >         subf 3, 5, 3                                 subf 3, 5, 3 > >         stw 3, 44(1)                                stw 3, 44(1) > >                                                                # InlineAsm > Start > >                                                -->          is...

...drom e:: -> /dev/cdrom What does the entry with the two colons (::) tell Wine? 2) Is there a particular reason that certain drive letters are used? Have their been any standards setup as to what gets mapped where in Wine? 3) I'm using SuSE 10.0 with most of my non-system mounts using subfs and the CD drives are told in the subfs options that they are going to be cdfss. This (or one of the subfs options, I'm not sure which) causes a problem in that when e disk is placed in the CD drive, it creates a new directory with the name of the CD volume and mounts it there. This prev...

...eu: > Hello, > > I am seeking advice as to how I can download the 833 files from this > site:"http://home.brisnet.org.au/~bgreen/Data/" > > I want to be able to download them to perform a textual analysis. > > If the 833 files, which are in a Directory with two subfolders were on > my computer I could read them through readtext. Using readtext I get the > error: > > > x = readtext("http://home.brisnet.org.au/~bgreen/Data/*") > Error in download_remote(file, ignore_missing, cache, verbosity) : > ? Remote URL does not end in k...

Here''s the latest USB code against the xen 3.0.0 release. Since the last posting this version updates the code to use the new 32 bit grant references and the latest GNTTABOP_map_grant_ref definition. I''ve also changed the definition of the virtual USB HCD to have a single port rather than seven ports with six unused. Domains importing multiple USB devices will get a HCD for

...sendet: Dienstag, 30. Juni 2009 19:16 An: LLVM Developers Mailing List Betreff: Re: [LLVMdev] modifying llc asm output On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Michael Graumann<MichaelGraumann at gmx.net> wrote: > Hi > > I am trying to modify the llc in that way: > > > >         subf 3, 5, 3                                 subf 3, 5, 3 > >         stw 3, 44(1)                                stw 3, 44(1) > >                                                                # InlineAsm > Start > >                                                -->          is...

...tr 1 2 /dev/hdd1 /sql ext3 acl,user_xattr 1 2 /dev/hda5 swap swap pri=42 0 0 devpts /dev/pts devpts mode=0620,gid=5 0 0 proc /proc proc defaults 0 0 usbfs /proc/bus/usb usbfs noauto 0 0 sysfs /sys sysfs noauto 0 0 /dev/cdrom /media/cdrom subfs fs=cdfss,ro,procuid,nosuid,nodev,exec,iocharset=utf8 0 0 /dev/fd0 /media/floppy subfs fs=floppyfss,procuid,nodev,nosuid,sync 0 0 ################################################# # Samba mount points # ################################################# 196.1...

...maximum = 12 months or whole year deficit). Even though I "jitter"-ed the minimum or maximum FD value only (eg. FD=0+1e-6 or FD=12-1e-6), nothing changed to the result. The formula I used is like this: -------------------------------------------------------------- glm(FD ~ Fsize, data = subFS) -- Coefficients: (Intercept) Fsize 7.7913 -0.3092 Degrees of Freedom: 29 Total (i.e. Null); 28 Residual Null Deviance: 463 Residual Deviance: 425.5 AIC: 170.7 -------------------------------------------------------------- I appreciate for any clarification. Best w...

...m could read these events and do "something". These events would be "Add", "Delete", "Move" - these would be posted every time a new message is added, deleted or moved. "CreateDir", "DeleteDir" would be published when a user creates a subf-folder or removes one. A simple example would be to configure the system to publish 'Add Message' events, and then an external program would read these, and send a notification event to web based users who are currently logged in. The publish feature would be controlled by the co...

...e, LBB1_8 was falling through LBB1_4, and now it is falling on LBB1_9. LBB1_3: ;no_exit lis r4, 21845 ori r4, r4, 21846 mulhw r4, r2, r4 addi r5, r2, -1 li r6, -1 srwi r6, r4, 31 add r4, r4, r6 mulli r4, r4, 3 li r6, 1 subf r2, r4, r2 cmpwi cr0, r2, 0 beq cr0, LBB1_9 ;no_exit LBB1_7: ;no_exit mr r2, r6 LBB1_8: ;no_exit cmpwi cr0, r5, 0 add r2, r2, r3 bgt cr0, LBB1_5 ;no_exit.no_exit_llvm_crit_edge LBB1_9: ;no_exit mr r2, r6 b LBB1_8 ;no_exit LBB1_4...

Sadly the latest optimization broke completely everything. The asm code isn't gas compliant. the libFLAC linker script has a typo, disabling the asm optimization and/or altivec won't let a correct build anyway. Instant fixes for the asm stuff: sed -i -e"s:;:\#:" on the lpc_asm.s to load address instead of addis+ori you could use lis and la and PLEASE use the @l(register)

...(z=10; z<20; z++) s += ((((t*z-u)*z-v)*z-w)*z-x)*z-y; // loopbody2 } Now, the assembly that is produced has 21 loads, which indicates no effort to reuse any data. In particular, the two basic blocks that correspond to loopbody1 and to loopbody2 are identical (except that the adds become subfs). Being identical, both of these generated basic blocks have 8 loads in their first 11 instructions. These 8 loads will fetch the eight variables. But, of course, by the time loopbody2 is reached, some of these variables are already in registers and so they did not need to be reloaded. Moreover, t...

...is falling on LBB1_9. > > LBB1_3: ;no_exit > lis r4, 21845 > ori r4, r4, 21846 > mulhw r4, r2, r4 > addi r5, r2, -1 > li r6, -1 > srwi r6, r4, 31 > add r4, r4, r6 > mulli r4, r4, 3 > li r6, 1 > subf r2, r4, r2 > cmpwi cr0, r2, 0 > beq cr0, LBB1_9 ;no_exit > LBB1_7: ;no_exit > mr r2, r6 > LBB1_8: ;no_exit > cmpwi cr0, r5, 0 > add r2, r2, r3 > bgt cr0, LBB1_5 ;no_exit.no_exit_llvm_crit_edge > LBB1_9: ;no_exit > mr r2,...

...hortcirc_next_2E_11; } else { goto l13_UnifiedReturnBlock; } Basically it does that check and puts the result in l2_tmp_2E_182, then uses that in the if check and the ternary thing. When this is compiled, the assembly that it generates for that check/assignment is: subc r29, r25, r2 subfe r29,r29,r29 neg r29,r29 This is pretty slow compared to just doing the check on the fly (and being able to just use a compare instruction). If I manually edit the code to change it to: l13_shortcirc_next_2E_11: l8_chain_length_2E_039 = ((l8_tmp_2E_180 > l8_mem_tmp_2E_0) ? (4294967295u)...

...mfspr r0,256 ; cache old vrsave addis r31,0,hi16(0xfffffc00) ori r31,r31,lo16(0xfffffc00) mtspr 256,r31 ; declare VRs in vrsave cmplw cr0,r8,r4 ; i<data_len bc 4,0,L1400 ; load coefficients into v0-v7 and initial history into v8-v15 li r31,0xf and r31,r8,r31 ; r31: data%4 li r11,16 subf r31,r31,r11 ; r31: 4-(data%4) slwi r31,r31,3 ; convert to bits for vsro li r10,-4 stw r31,-4(r9) lvewx v0,r10,r9 vspltisb v18,-1 vsro v18,v18,v0 ; v18: mask vector li r31,0x8 lvsl v0,0,r31 vsldoi v0,v0,v0,12 li r31,0xc lvsl v1,0,r31 vspltisb v2,0 vspltisb v3,-1 vmrglw v2,v2,v3 vsel...

> If you don't want critical edges in the machine code CFG, you're going to > have to write a machine code CFG critical edge splitting pass: LLVM > doesn't currently have one. > > -Chris Hey guys, I've coded a pass to break the critical edges of the machine control flow graph. The program works fine, but I am sure it is not the right way of implementing it.

On Tue, 4 Jul 2006, Fernando Magno Quintao Pereira wrote: > However, it does not remove all the critical edges. I am getting a very > weird dataflow graph (even without the Break Critical edges pass). The > dataflow generated by MachineFunction::dump() for the program below is > given here: > http://compilers.cs.ucla.edu/fernando/projects/soc/images/loop_no_crit2.pdf ... > The

On Tue, 4 May 2004, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Tue, 4 May 2004, Chris Lattner wrote: > > I suspect that a large reason that LLVM does worst than a native C > > compiler with the CBE+GCC is that LLVM generates very low-level C code, > > and I'm not convinced that GCC is doing a very good job (ie, without > > syntactic loops). > > Yup, this is EXACTLY what is