search for: stubba

I''ve recently upgraded to the latest versions of Mocha and RSpec (0.3.2 and 0.6.3 respectively) and I''m no longer able to use Mocha/ Stubba with RSpec. Its actually only Stubba I''m interested in as I use RSpec''s built-in mocking library. I require stubba in my spec file but whenever I try and run my spec it fails with the error: Unintialized constant Test Digging around the Mocha source, it seems that it is try...

...ing Mocha. As someone who''s been practicing TDD much longer than I''ve been using Rails, one of my biggest complaints has always been the fact that the "Unit" tests are more like intefration tests because of how tightly coupled the domain model is when using ActiveRecord. Stubba looks like it could really help aleviate this problem. The one problem I''m having though, is that I want to be able to stub out a method on an existing class _and_ use the mock expectations on that method. Basically, I have a Product class (ActiveRecord) that has a class-method Product.i...

Hi, I''ve been reading with interest the threads trying to integrate Mocha and Stubba with RSpec. So far, I''ve made the two changes in spec_helper.rb suggested, but discovered another one that neither of the archives mentions: If you use traditional mocking: object = mock or the stub shortcut : object = stub(:method => :result), you run into namespace conflicts wit...

...#39;README'', ''RELEASE'', ''COPYING'', ''MIT-LICENSE'', ''agiledox.txt'', ''lib/mocha/auto_verify.rb'', ''lib/mocha/mock_methods.rb'', ''lib/mocha/expectation.rb'', ''lib/stubba/object.rb'') + task.rdoc_files.include(''README'', ''RELEASE'', ''COPYING'', ''MIT-LICENSE'', ''agiledox.txt'', ''lib/mocha/auto_verify.rb'', ''lib/mocha/mock_methods.rb'', '...

Hi guys. Quite happy with mocha for testing. It''s been a bit of an eye opener for me, and I expect to begin using it heavily. One other thing I''d like to do is stub out particular class methods in development. Is there a way I can do this with mocha? Jason

This works: class X def X.initialize( stuff ) end end X.initialize("bla") However stubbing it doesn,t: require ''test/unit'' require ''stubba'' class X def X.initialize( stuff ) end end class XTest < Test::Unit::TestCase def test_ X.stubs(:initialize).with("bla") X.initialize("bla") end end Ruby lets me know that: Loaded suite /tmp/foo Started E...

...riority: 3 Submitted By: Craig Ambrose (craigambrose) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: Using a setup method in test_case_class destroys subsequent test cases Initial Comment: Using a method called setup within a Test::Unit::TestCase derived class works as expected once you start using mocha and stubba, providing that you run only that test file. If you run several such files, subsequent ones throw exceptions because the Stubba method setup_stubs is no longer getting called (your test case setup method has overwritten it) and thus $stubba is nil. The error you actually see, if you are usings...

Hi James, An instance retains its mocha between tests if that instance is pointed to by a constant. The simplest failing test is something like (add as a new file in mocha/test).. #--code-- require File.join(File.dirname(__FILE__), "test_helper") require ''stubba'' class WemStubbaTest < Test::Unit::TestCase Arr = [1, 2, 3] def test_a Arr.stubs(:size).returns(6) assert_equal 6, Arr.size end def test_b assert_equal 3, Arr.size #=> Failing test when both tests run consecutively end end #--/code-- I got as far as notic...

I''m pushing a major overhaul in testing the Rails codebase. Mocha and stubba make my life easy so that''s what I''m using. The first major patch using them is in RailTies (http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/5970) now. I spoke to DHH today about using it in the other libraries and I think it''ll be ok, but they really want to include as little code as...

Hello All, I need to stub two class methods before a selenium call. The .rsel is : require ''mocha'' SalesConfigWork.stubs(:load_work_data) SalesConfigWork.stubs(:delete_work_data) setup :fixtures => :sales_config_works open "/" The Selenium test runner result is : undefined method `stubs'' for SalesConfigWork:Class Extracted source (around line *#0*):

...ils controller that does some processing. Based on the return value of this method, a particular action decides what to do. I do not want to make this method public, because public methods in a controller are callable from a URL. Below is a patch to enable stubbing of private methods. Index: lib/stubba/instance_method.rb =================================================================== --- lib/stubba/instance_method.rb (revision 57) +++ lib/stubba/instance_method.rb (working copy) @@ -13,8 +13,9 @@ # intentionally empty end - def exists? - stubbee.respo...

.../unit'' > => true > irb(main):003:0> require ''mocha'' > => false > irb(main):004:0> Object.methods.include? "expects" > => false > irb(main):005:0> One of the changes in HEAD has been to do away with the split between Mocha and Stubba and amalgamate it all under Mocha. However in the gem 0.3.2 you still need to require ''stubba'' as per the example in the Mocha docs - http://mocha.rubyforge.org/examples/stubba.html Hope that makes sense. -- James. http://blog.floehopper.org -- James. http://blog.floehopper.or...

I''m a big fan of stubbing Time.now so it returns a known value. I used to be able to use stubba and say: @time_now = Time.parse("Jan 1 2001") Time.stubs(:now).returns(lambda{@time_now}) However, something in trunk broke that. Fine, rspec''s got its own stubbing lib now, so I tried switching to that: @time_now = Time.parse("Jan 1 2001") Time.stub!(:now).and_ret...

Hello, I''m wanting to use Mocha and Stubba for my tests in place of the default Rails testing with fixtures. I have the following class: class Person < ActiveRecord::Base validates_uniqueness_of :email end and am wondering how I can test to ensure that the validates_uniqueness_of validation is running. Any ideas? -Jonathan

...stubbing :delegates end class Delegator def initialize expectation @expectation = expectation end def evaluate @expectation.mock.stub_method.stubbee.send(@expectation.mock.stub_method.hidden_method) end end end class Object def expects(symbol) method = stubba_method.new(stubba_object, symbol) $stubba.stub(method) mocha.expects(symbol, caller, method) end def stubs(symbol) method = stubba_method.new(stubba_object, symbol) $stubba.stub(method) mocha.stubs(symbol, caller, method) end end Haven''t tested this with anyth...

...s.com/person/5103-tomas-pospisek> ). - Reverse order in which expectations are matched, so that last expectation is matched first. This allows e.g. a call to #stubs to be effectively overridden by a call to #expects (patch from Tobias Lutke<http://blog.leetsoft.com/> ). - Stubba & SmartTestCase modules incorporated into Mocha module so only need to require ''mocha'' ? no longer need to require ''stubba''. - AutoMocha removed. Thanks to all who contributed. Enjoy :-) I''ve created a mocha_release category on my blog, so if...

In unit or functional test, is there a way to check that a file has been deleted? It seems that running the test does not really execute deleting files, which is good because I don''t want it to actually delete the files. But can I check that the deletion should have been performed in test environment? thanks, - reynard -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

While running tests, we would like to instrument some of the classes under test. We still want the classes to do exactly what they currently do, but we would like them to do more when running in the test environment. Clearly we can (and currently do) just extend the objects "on the fly" where necessary, but this is a bit messy - we''d like some centralised way to always

Hi, I''m new to mocha and stubba but eager to learn. I have a rails functional test in which I would like to stub an instance method of particular class to always return true. I tried the following: def test_post_checkout Order.any_instance.stubs(:successful?).returns(true) post :checkout assert_response :redirect...

...com> Hey James, Sorry to bug you. I was curious how you''d handle a call to exec in a method you were testing. Kernel.stubs(:exec)... doesn''t seem to work but I''m not sure where else an exec call might come from. Ideas? I''m going to push hard to get mocha and stubba into Rails (or atleast allow it for tests on the framework). It just saves me too much work to ignore. http://glu.ttono.us/articles/2006/09/01/the-flexibility-of-mocha -- Kevin Clark http://glu.ttono.us -- James. http://blog.floehopper.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attach...