Kevin Clark
2006-Sep-03 21:12 UTC
[mocha-developer] Slimmed down version for inclusion in Rails?
I''m pushing a major overhaul in testing the Rails codebase. Mocha and stubba make my life easy so that''s what I''m using. The first major patch using them is in RailTies (http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/5970) now. I spoke to DHH today about using it in the other libraries and I think it''ll be ok, but they really want to include as little code as needed. I haven''t used AutoMocha yet. From what I''ve read I don''t think I''ll need it in core. How difficult would it be to pull Mocha and Stubba into their own package for inclusion in Rails? Do either of them depend on AutoMocha? -- Kevin Clark http://glu.ttono.us
James Mead
2006-Sep-03 21:21 UTC
[mocha-developer] Slimmed down version for inclusion in Rails?
No problem at all - in fact I was thinking of moving AutoMocha into its own project anyway. I''ll try to get to it in the next day or two. On 03/09/06, Kevin Clark <kevin.clark at gmail.com> wrote:> I''m pushing a major overhaul in testing the Rails codebase. Mocha and > stubba make my life easy so that''s what I''m using. The first major > patch using them is in RailTies > (http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/5970) now. I spoke to DHH today > about using it in the other libraries and I think it''ll be ok, but > they really want to include as little code as needed. I haven''t used > AutoMocha yet. From what I''ve read I don''t think I''ll need it in core. > > How difficult would it be to pull Mocha and Stubba into their own > package for inclusion in Rails? Do either of them depend on AutoMocha? > > -- > Kevin Clark > http://glu.ttono.us > _______________________________________________ > mocha-developer mailing list > mocha-developer at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mocha-developer >-- James. http://blog.floehopper.org