search for: strtof

I've got this little program I wrote to test something, and it keeps giving the wrong result. I'm not inexperienced in C, but I can't believe strtof (et al) are broken, so I must be doing something wrong. However, I've spent hours looking at this and comparing it to the man pages and don't see what I'm doing wrong. strtod() and strtold() also give equally wrong results. (the example program given on the strotd man page works fine, B...

...irast.o(.text+0x1170): In function `strtoll': : multiple definition of `strtoll' main.o(.text+0x13b0): first defined here trirast.o(.text+0x11a0): In function `strtold': : multiple definition of `strtold' main.o(.text+0x13e0): first defined here trirast.o(.text+0x11d0): In function `strtof': : multiple definition of `strtof' main.o(.text+0x1410): first defined here trirast.o(.text+0x1200): In function `strtoul': : multiple definition of `strtoul' main.o(.text+0x1440): first defined here trirast.o(.text+0x1230): In function `strtol': : multiple definition of `strto...

...untime functions on the target, or is this difficult ? In the > mailing list archive I saw some unresolved question with warnings about > type conversions for someone trying this... > I'm not sure I understand your question. The program will have a call to the C runtime functions (like strtof), and those are compiled into calls in the assembly language. (Of course, the libc library needs to be linked in to get the executable.) There are a few C runtime calls that LLVM handles specially -- like memset, memcpy, etc. But it's not necessary to have *all* C runtime calls be builtins or i...

...s this difficult ? In the >> mailing list archive I saw some unresolved question with warnings about >> type conversions for someone trying this... >> >> > I'm not sure I understand your question. The program will have a call > to the C runtime functions (like strtof), and those are compiled into > calls in the assembly language. (Of course, the libc library needs to > be linked in to get the executable.) There are a few C runtime calls > that LLVM handles specially -- like memset, memcpy, etc. But it's not > necessary to have *all* C runtime ca...

Hi All - Newbie warning... I am developing for a target that does not have a functioning C++ environment, and need to use C++. It was suggested that I could use LLVM to compile to C (using llc -march=c), then run the resulting C-code through the working C-cross-compilation tools. So, some newbie questions: (1) Is this crazy ? (2) What happens to all the C++ RTL ? Is it statically linked as

...icult ? In the > >> mailing list archive I saw some unresolved question with warnings about > >> type conversions for someone trying this... > >> > > I'm not sure I understand your question. The program will have a call > > to the C runtime functions (like strtof), and those are compiled into > > calls in the assembly language. (Of course, the libc library needs to > > be linked in to get the executable.) There are a few C runtime calls > > that LLVM handles specially -- like memset, memcpy, etc. But it's not > > necessary to hav...

.../cstdlib:161: error: Syntaxfehler before `.' token /usr/include/c++/3.3/cstdlib:172: error: `atoll' not declared /usr/include/c++/3.3/cstdlib:173: error: `strtoll' not declared /usr/include/c++/3.3/cstdlib:174: error: `strtoull' not declared /usr/include/c++/3.3/cstdlib:176: error: `strtof' not declared /usr/include/c++/3.3/cstdlib:177: error: `strtold' not declared /usr/include/c++/3.3/cstdlib:178: error: Fehler beim Parsen before `}' token /usr/include/c++/3.3/cstdlib:183: error: `lldiv_t' not declared /usr/include/c++/3.3/cstdlib:185: error: `_Exit' not declare...

...nBufferInfoEx 39866 XIIZeal (steam) immediately exits on start 39875 Starcraft can't see Direct Cable Connection games hosted on another computer 39878 Diablo II does not start on 64bit system with more than 2GB VRAM cards 39908 SuperTux 0.3.5a crashes on startup, needs msvcr120.dll.strtof 40021 IDEA v1.7 fails to start 40053 Romance of the Three Kingdoms 13 (三國志13) fails to start 40083 Heroes of the Storm Freezes/Crashes after its recent updates 40129 MSI Reading and Writing Behaves differently than Windows 40147 Assertion 'm->state == STATE_PASSIVE' failed...

Eric Christopher <echristo at apple.com> writes: >>> Or cleanup both headers from unused stuff by Eric's >>> suggestion? >> >> I'm not sure this is a good idea (not that it is bad either). Murphy's >> Law says that a function that you remove today will be used tomorrow. > > I meant literally functions that aren't used in the

On Jan 5, 2011, at 6:34 AM, Óscar Fuentes wrote: > arrowdodger <6yearold at gmail.com> writes: > >>> Or to say it with other words: patches welcome. >> >> So, how should i proceed? Make CMake-generated config to be identical to >> autotools one? > > That would be a good thing. > > Please note that some checks are a bit tricky. A function that

...tomorrow. And adding an autoconf > check is far from trivial, at least for those not familiarized with the > autotools. > Adding a check for most standard functions is amazingly trivial: AC_CHECK_FUNCS([backtrace ceilf floorf roundf rintf nearbyintf getcwd ]) AC_CHECK_FUNCS([powf fmodf strtof round ]) AC_CHECK_FUNCS([getpagesize getrusage getrlimit setrlimit gettimeofday ]) AC_CHECK_FUNCS([isatty mkdtemp mkstemp ]) AC_CHECK_FUNCS([mktemp posix_spawn realpath sbrk setrlimit strdup ]) AC_CHECK_FUNCS([strerror strerror_r strerror_s setenv ]) AC_CHECK_FUNCS([strtoll strtoq sysconf malloc_zo...

...n declared /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.2/include/g++-v4/cstdlib:194: error: ::strtoll has not been declared /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.2/include/g++-v4/cstdlib:195: error: ::strtoull has not been declared /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.2/include/g++-v4/cstdlib:197: error: ::strtof has not been declared /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.2/include/g++-v4/cstdlib:198: error: ::strtold has not been declared /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.2/include/g++-v4/cstdlib:204: error: __gnu_cxx::lldiv_t has not been declared /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.2/include/g++-v4/cs...

...lls are folded: 1. `InstCombiners`: __memcpy_chk, __mempcpy_chk, __memset_chk, __strcpy_chk, __stpcpy_chk, __strncpy_chk, __stpncpy_chk, __strcat_chk, __strncat_chk. 2. `SimplifyLibCalls`: strcat, strncat, strchar, strrchr, strcmp, strncmp, strcpy, strncpy, strlen, strpbrk, strtol, strtod, strtof, strtoul, strtoll, strtold, strtoull, strtold, strtoull, strspn, strcspn, strstr, memcmp, memcpy, memmove, memset, __strcpy_chk, cosf, cos, cosl, powf, pow, powl, llvm.pow.f32, llvm.pow.f64, llvm.pow.f80, llvm.pow.f128, llvm.pow.ppcf128, exp21, exp2, exp2f, llvm.exp2.ppcf128, llvm.exp2....

This is 2nd version of the earlier patch featuring a few new features and fixes to the apcsmart driver, following the remarks in: http://www.mail-archive.com/nut-upsdev at lists.alioth.debian.org/msg02294.html Major changes from v1: - handle battery.charge and battery.runtime checks at main.c level - handle "immutable but writable" conflict gracefully at driver level -

...s checking for uint64_t... yes checking for backtrace... yes checking for ceilf... yes checking for floorf... yes checking for roundf... yes checking for rintf... yes checking for nearbyintf... yes checking for getcwd... yes checking for powf... yes checking for fmodf... yes checking for strtof... yes checking for round... yes checking for log... yes checking for log2... yes checking for log10... yes checking for exp... yes checking for exp2... yes checking for getpagesize... yes checking for getrusage... yes checking for getrlimit... yes checking for setrlimit... yes checking...

...t64_t... yes checking for uint64_t... yes checking for backtrace... yes checking for ceilf... yes checking for floorf... yes checking for roundf... yes checking for rintf... yes checking for nearbyintf... yes checking for getcwd... yes checking for powf... yes checking for fmodf... yes checking for strtof... yes checking for round... yes checking for getpagesize... yes checking for getrusage... yes checking for getrlimit... yes checking for setrlimit... yes checking for gettimeofday... yes checking for isatty... yes checking for mkdtemp... yes checking for mkstemp... yes checking for mktemp... yes c...

...-------------------------- Changes since 3.7: Akihiro Sagawa (2): winmm: Fix default time division value in MIDI stream. winmm: Avoid casting unsigned char to plain char. Alex Henrie (8): user32/tests: Drop nonsensical broadcast tests that fail on Windows 10. include: Add strtof and strtold. ucrtbase: Hook up _Exit. include: Add atoll. include: Add strtoll, strtoll_l, strtoull, and strtoull_l. include: Add llabs. include: Add lldiv and lldiv_t. msvcrt: Omit pointer coding functions from SOs for newer MSVC versions. Alexandre Julliard (8...

Hi Ulrich, thanks for the suggestion. My concern is that one of the valid inputs is "2.5", which would require conversion to an int, e.g. x10, but doing something like this would start to affect the code readability. On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 3:02 PM Ulrich Windl < Ulrich.Windl at rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote: > Hi! > > A note on style: Looking at this chunk of the patch

...nt64_t... yes checking for uint64_t... yes checking for backtrace... no checking for ceilf... yes checking for floorf... yes checking for roundf... yes checking for rintf... yes checking for nearbyintf... yes checking for getcwd... yes checking for powf... yes checking for fmodf... yes checking for strtof... yes checking for round... yes checking for getpagesize... yes checking for getrusage... yes checking for getrlimit... yes checking for setrlimit... yes checking for gettimeofday... yes checking for isatty... yes checking for mkdtemp... no checking for mkstemp... yes checking for mktemp... yes ch...

...t64_t... yes checking for uint64_t... yes checking for backtrace... yes checking for ceilf... yes checking for floorf... yes checking for roundf... yes checking for rintf... yes checking for nearbyintf... yes checking for getcwd... yes checking for powf... yes checking for fmodf... yes checking for strtof... yes checking for round... yes checking for getpagesize... yes checking for getrusage... yes checking for getrlimit... yes checking for setrlimit... yes checking for gettimeofday... yes checking for isatty... yes checking for mkdtemp... yes checking for mkstemp... yes checking for mktemp... yes c...