search for: strtol

...uot;). > indeed consistent with R's documentation on strtoi(). > What machine would that be? >> But on all the other machines I've seen, 0L is >> returned. This seems to be consistent with the output of >> a simple C program using the underlying strtol function >> (see data.table link for this program, and for full >> sessionInfo() of some environments with differing >> output). >> So, what is the correct output of strtoi("", base = 2L)? >> Is the cross-platform inconsistency to be...

Hello, I am working on replacing atoi () and atol() functions with strtol() and strtoul() . I came across many files which uses statement like these time_t secs= atoi(data_span.c_str()), here time_t Datatype is not known but wikipedia says that it is integer so is it necessary to replace atoi with strtol over here ?? And is their any document which helps me what each...

On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 12:42:08AM +0530, Priyank Bhatt wrote: > As James said I am attaching two file *date.cc* and *datematchdecider.cc* Please send patches, not complete source files: http://trac.xapian.org/browser/git/xapian-core/HACKING#L1176 Patches are much smaller, and don't require the reviewer to work out the exact version of the source file you started from. Cheers, Olly

...eger_ (which seems consistent with ?strtoi: "Values which cannot be interpreted as integers or would overflow are returned as NA_integer_"). But on all the other machines I've seen, 0L is returned. This seems to be consistent with the output of a simple C program using the underlying strtol function (see data.table link for this program, and for full sessionInfo() of some environments with differing output). So, what is the correct output of strtoi("", base = 2L)? Is the cross-platform inconsistency to be expected/documentable? Michael Chirico [[alternative HTML version...

...se are some points stimulated by reading about C history (and related in their implementation). 1) On some platforms > as.integer("0xA") [1] 10 but not all (not on Solaris nor Windows). We do not define what is allowed, and rely on the OS's implementation of strtod (yes, not strtol). It seems that glibc does allow hex: C99 mandates it but C89 seems not to allow it. I think that was a mistake, and strtol should have been used. Then C89 does mandate the handling of hex constants and also octal ones. So changing to strtol would change the meaning of as.integer("011&qu...

Thanks! I'll try that. In order to avoid starting a new thread, let me ask you the next question. One of the shared libraries I load calls strtol and msan fails to intercept it. Why would this be? The library seems to be otherwise implemented. One of the potential culprits I saw is that strtol is marked as strong in libc. Is there any workaround? Keno On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Evgeniy Stepanov <eugeni.stepanov at gmail.com> wro...

...definition of "val" also. Is that ok to do so ? Just need to clarify . On 16 December 2014 at 04:34, Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 02:32:31AM +0530, Priyank Bhatt wrote: > > I am working on replacing atoi () and atol() functions with strtol() and > > strtoul() . I came across many files which uses statement like these > > time_t secs= atoi(data_span.c_str()), here time_t Datatype is not known > but > > wikipedia says that it is integer so is it necessary to replace atoi > with > > strtol over here ?? &g...

On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 11:38:42PM +0000, James Aylett wrote: > Collapsing is done using a valueno (you can tell because collapse_key > is of type Xapian::valueno), which is a 32 bit unsigned integer (see > here: > https://getting-started-with-xapian.readthedocs.org/en/latest/concepts/indexing/values.html). > For 32 bit unsigned you need unsigned long. Xapian::valueno is actually a

...rned > as NA_integer_"). indeed consistent with R's documentation on strtoi(). What machine would that be? > But on all the other machines I've seen, 0L is > returned. This seems to be consistent with the output of a > simple C program using the underlying strtol function (see > data.table link for this program, and for full > sessionInfo() of some environments with differing output). > So, what is the correct output of strtoi("", base = 2L)? > Is the cross-platform inconsistency to be > expected/documentable?...

...consistent with R's documentation on strtoi(). > > What machine would that be? > > >> But on all the other machines I've seen, 0L is > >> returned. This seems to be consistent with the output of > >> a simple C program using the underlying strtol function > >> (see data.table link for this program, and for full > >> sessionInfo() of some environments with differing > >> output). > > >> So, what is the correct output of strtoi("", base = 2L)? > > >> Is the cross...

...*val, *low; val = dstate_getinfo("battery.charge"); low = dstate_getinfo("battery.charge.low"); - + upsdebugx(2, "%s: charge val/low %s/%s']", __func__, val, low); if (val && low && (strtol(val, NULL, 10) < strtol(low, NULL, 10))) { snprintfcat(status_buf, sizeof(status_buf), " LB"); upsdebugx(2, "%s: appending LB flag [charge '%s' below '%s']", __func__, val, low); @@ -1127,6 +1131,7 @@...

...eturn signo; } #ifdef SIGRTMIN - if ( !strncasecmp(string, "RTMIN", 5) ) { + if (!strncasecmp(string, "RTMIN", 5)) { char *ep; - if ( string[5] && string[5] != '+' ) + if (string[5] && string[5] != '+') return -1; - i = SIGRTMIN + strtol(string+5, &ep, 10); - if ( *ep || i < SIGRTMIN || i > SIGRTMAX ) + signo = SIGRTMIN + strtol(string+5, &ep, 10); + if (*ep || signo < SIGRTMIN || signo > SIGRTMAX) return -1; - return i; + return signo; } - if ( !strncasecmp(string, "RTMAX", 5) ) { + if (!...

...eturn signo; } #ifdef SIGRTMIN - if ( !strncasecmp(string, "RTMIN", 5) ) { + if (!strncasecmp(string, "RTMIN", 5)) { char *ep; - if ( string[5] && string[5] != '+' ) + if (string[5] && string[5] != '+') return -1; - i = SIGRTMIN + strtol(string+5, &ep, 10); - if ( *ep || i < SIGRTMIN || i > SIGRTMAX ) + signo = SIGRTMIN + strtol(string+5, &ep, 10); + if (*ep || signo < SIGRTMIN || signo > SIGRTMAX) return -1; - return i; + return signo; } - if ( !strncasecmp(string, "RTMAX", 5) ) { + if (!...

...n windows. I will also add other beckend in the future (Sparc, PowerPC). I hope windows using Visual C++ will be soon officially supported :) About the problem I had with system and ltdl.c, it was resolved preaty easily by defining __WINDOWS__ globally in project. I also added a global macro for strtoll because the windows version is strtol (not strtoll). macro replaces strtoll with strtol and it compiles. I found really a lot of warnings in the project. Should I clean them? GCC probably doesn't throw them, so I don't know ... I don't even want to try to compile with VS8 which is...

...uint16_t pitch, uint16_t duration) +{ + unsigned int ms = BASE_TEMPO * duration / tempo; + + switch (pitch) { + case T_REST: + beep_off(); + break; + default: + beep_on(pitch); + break; + } + + msleep(ms); +} + +int main(int argc, char *argv[]) +{ + int i; + unsigned int tempo = 0; + + tempo = strtol(argv[1], NULL, 10); + if (!tempo) { + printf("usage: play [<tempo>] [<pitch> <duration>...]\n"); + return 1; + } + + for (i = 2; i + 1 < argc; i += 2) { + uint16_t pitch; + uint16_t duration; + + pitch = strtol(argv[i], NULL, 10); + duration = strtol(argv[i + 1]...

...OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P1 Component: iptables AssignedTo: laforge at netfilter.org ReportedBy: chris at linuxinfotag.de When using the -m policy match, the option argument for --spi is converted using strtol(), which returns a signed 32 bit value, so the highest positive value is 0x7fffffff. Instead strtoul() should be used. The same applies for the --reqid option argument. Setting a rule like iptables -A FORWARD -m policy --dir in --spi cafe2342 -j ACCEPT and looking at the chain afterwards will giv...

Hello, I came across the file *omega.cc* which is in directory* xapain-application/omega/* In this file , atoi is used in *Percentage Relevance cutoff *(293 line no) as Percentage lies between 0-100 their is no need to modify atoi . But do we need to check for error's ? Second Implementation is in *collapsing* (301) in which we collapse set of document under a key,range of this key has not

...as long been known that the C specification of *scanf() leaves behavior undefined for things like int i; sscanf("9999999999999999", "%i", &i); C11 7.21.6.2 P12 "Matches an optionally signed integer, whose format is the same as expected for the subject sequence of the strtol function with the value 0 for the base argument." C11 7.21.6.2 P10 "If this object does not have an appropriate type, or if the result of the conversion cannot be represented in the object, the behavior is undefined." as there is an overflow when consuming the input which matches...

...t; val = dstate_getinfo("battery.charge"); > low = dstate_getinfo("battery.charge.low"); > - > + upsdebugx(2, "%s: charge val/low %s/%s']", __func__, val, low); > if (val && low && (strtol(val, NULL, 10) < strtol(low, NULL, 10))) { > snprintfcat(status_buf, sizeof(status_buf), " LB"); > upsdebugx(2, "%s: appending LB flag [charge '%s' below '%s']", __func__, val, low); > @@ -1127,6 +1131,7 @@...

...r:win32:fixup_imports No implementation for ADVAPI32.DLL.73(ConvertSecurityDescriptorToStringSecurityDescriptorW), setting to 0xdeadbeef err:win32:fixup_imports No implementation for ADVAPI32.DLL.305(LsaGetUserName), setting to 0xdeadbeef err:win32:fixup_imports No implementation for NTDLL.DLL.1162(strtol), setting to 0xdeadbeef err:win32:fixup_imports No implementation for NTDLL.DLL.1101(_ultow), setting to 0xdeadbeef err:win32:fixup_imports No implementation for NTDLL.DLL.515(RtlInitializeCriticalSectionAndSpinCount), setting to 0xdeadbeef err:win32:fixup_imports No implementation for NTDLL.DLL.24...