search for: strid_index

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "strid_index".

Did you mean: strid_indexed
2013 Feb 04
2
[LLVMdev] Asserts in bundleWithPred() and bundleWithSucc()
...ot;): I have the following (existing) bundle for which I want to regenerate the bundle header (You see that %R17 is not currently in the def list for the bundle header). v BUNDLE %P3<imp-def>, %R29<imp-use>, %D8<imp-use,kill>, %D9<imp-use,kill>, %R6<imp-use> *^v STrid_indexed %R29, 80, %D8<kill>; mem:ST8[FixedStack2] *^v STrid_indexed %R29, 72, %D9<kill>; mem:ST8[FixedStack3] *^v %P3<def> = CMPEQri %R6, 0 *^ %R17<def> = TFR_cdnNotPt %P3<internal>, %R1 v BUNDLE %R29<imp-use>, %D10<imp-use,kill>, %R7<imp-use>, %D6&l...
2013 Feb 04
0
[LLVMdev] Asserts in bundleWithPred() and bundleWithSucc()
...ing) bundle for which I want to regenerate the > bundle header (You see that %R17 is not currently in the def list for the > bundle header). > > > v BUNDLE %P3<imp-def>, %R29<imp-use>, %D8<imp-use,kill>, > %D9<imp-use,kill>, %R6<imp-use> > *^v STrid_indexed %R29, 80, %D8<kill>; mem:ST8[FixedStack2] > *^v STrid_indexed %R29, 72, %D9<kill>; mem:ST8[FixedStack3] > *^v %P3<def> = CMPEQri %R6, 0 > *^ %R17<def> = TFR_cdnNotPt %P3<internal>, %R1 > v BUNDLE %R29<imp-use>, %D10<imp-use,kill>, %R7&lt...
2013 Feb 02
0
[LLVMdev] Asserts in bundleWithPred() and bundleWithSucc()
On Feb 1, 2013, at 3:43 PM, "Sergei Larin" <slarin at codeaurora.org> wrote: > I have a question about the following (four) asserts recently added in > bundleWithPred() and bundleWithSucc() (see below). What is the real danger > of reasserting a connection even if it already exist? The intention was to identify code that may have been converted from the old style a
2013 Feb 04
2
[LLVMdev] Asserts in bundleWithPred() and bundleWithSucc()
...want to regenerate > > the bundle header (You see that %R17 is not currently in the def list > > for the bundle header). > > > > > > v BUNDLE %P3<imp-def>, %R29<imp-use>, %D8<imp-use,kill>, > > %D9<imp-use,kill>, %R6<imp-use> *^v STrid_indexed %R29, 80, > > %D8<kill>; mem:ST8[FixedStack2] *^v STrid_indexed %R29, 72, > > %D9<kill>; mem:ST8[FixedStack3] *^v %P3<def> = CMPEQri %R6, 0 > > *^ %R17<def> = TFR_cdnNotPt %P3<internal>, %R1 > > v BUNDLE %R29<imp-use>, %D10<imp-...
2013 Feb 01
4
[LLVMdev] Asserts in bundleWithPred() and bundleWithSucc()
Jakob, I have a question about the following (four) asserts recently added in bundleWithPred() and bundleWithSucc() (see below). What is the real danger of reasserting a connection even if it already exist? My problem with them happens when I try to call finalizeBundle() on an existing bundle to which I have added a new instruction. The goal - a new bundle header with liveness abbreviation, but
2012 Apr 19
0
[LLVMdev] Target Dependent Hexagon Packetizer patch
...e Hexagon::STrib_indexed_shl_cPt_V4 : >> + case Hexagon::STrib_indexed_shl_cNotPt_V4 : >> + case Hexagon::STrib_cPt : >> + case Hexagon::STrib_cNotPt : >> + case Hexagon::POST_STbri_cPt : >> + case Hexagon::POST_STbri_cNotPt : >> + case Hexagon::STrid_indexed_cPt : >> + case Hexagon::STrid_indexed_cNotPt : >> + case Hexagon::STrid_indexed_shl_cPt_V4 : >> + case Hexagon::POST_STdri_cPt : >> + case Hexagon::POST_STdri_cNotPt : >> + case Hexagon::STrih_cPt : >> + case Hexagon::STrih_cNotPt : >>...