Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "strid_indexed".
2013 Feb 04
2
[LLVMdev] Asserts in bundleWithPred() and bundleWithSucc()
...ot;):
I have the following (existing) bundle for which I want to regenerate the
bundle header (You see that %R17 is not currently in the def list for the
bundle header).
v BUNDLE %P3<imp-def>, %R29<imp-use>, %D8<imp-use,kill>,
%D9<imp-use,kill>, %R6<imp-use>
*^v STrid_indexed %R29, 80, %D8<kill>; mem:ST8[FixedStack2]
*^v STrid_indexed %R29, 72, %D9<kill>; mem:ST8[FixedStack3]
*^v %P3<def> = CMPEQri %R6, 0
*^ %R17<def> = TFR_cdnNotPt %P3<internal>, %R1
v BUNDLE %R29<imp-use>, %D10<imp-use,kill>, %R7<imp-use>, %D6<...
2013 Feb 04
0
[LLVMdev] Asserts in bundleWithPred() and bundleWithSucc()
...ing) bundle for which I want to regenerate the
> bundle header (You see that %R17 is not currently in the def list for the
> bundle header).
>
>
> v BUNDLE %P3<imp-def>, %R29<imp-use>, %D8<imp-use,kill>,
> %D9<imp-use,kill>, %R6<imp-use>
> *^v STrid_indexed %R29, 80, %D8<kill>; mem:ST8[FixedStack2]
> *^v STrid_indexed %R29, 72, %D9<kill>; mem:ST8[FixedStack3]
> *^v %P3<def> = CMPEQri %R6, 0
> *^ %R17<def> = TFR_cdnNotPt %P3<internal>, %R1
> v BUNDLE %R29<imp-use>, %D10<imp-use,kill>, %R7<i...
2013 Feb 02
0
[LLVMdev] Asserts in bundleWithPred() and bundleWithSucc()
On Feb 1, 2013, at 3:43 PM, "Sergei Larin" <slarin at codeaurora.org> wrote:
> I have a question about the following (four) asserts recently added in
> bundleWithPred() and bundleWithSucc() (see below). What is the real danger
> of reasserting a connection even if it already exist?
The intention was to identify code that may have been converted from the old style a
2013 Feb 04
2
[LLVMdev] Asserts in bundleWithPred() and bundleWithSucc()
...want to regenerate
> > the bundle header (You see that %R17 is not currently in the def list
> > for the bundle header).
> >
> >
> > v BUNDLE %P3<imp-def>, %R29<imp-use>, %D8<imp-use,kill>,
> > %D9<imp-use,kill>, %R6<imp-use> *^v STrid_indexed %R29, 80,
> > %D8<kill>; mem:ST8[FixedStack2] *^v STrid_indexed %R29, 72,
> > %D9<kill>; mem:ST8[FixedStack3] *^v %P3<def> = CMPEQri %R6, 0
> > *^ %R17<def> = TFR_cdnNotPt %P3<internal>, %R1
> > v BUNDLE %R29<imp-use>, %D10<imp-us...
2013 Feb 01
4
[LLVMdev] Asserts in bundleWithPred() and bundleWithSucc()
Jakob,
I have a question about the following (four) asserts recently added in
bundleWithPred() and bundleWithSucc() (see below). What is the real danger
of reasserting a connection even if it already exist? My problem with them
happens when I try to call finalizeBundle() on an existing bundle to which I
have added a new instruction. The goal - a new bundle header with liveness
abbreviation, but
2012 Apr 19
0
[LLVMdev] Target Dependent Hexagon Packetizer patch
...e Hexagon::STrib_indexed_shl_cPt_V4 :
>> + case Hexagon::STrib_indexed_shl_cNotPt_V4 :
>> + case Hexagon::STrib_cPt :
>> + case Hexagon::STrib_cNotPt :
>> + case Hexagon::POST_STbri_cPt :
>> + case Hexagon::POST_STbri_cNotPt :
>> + case Hexagon::STrid_indexed_cPt :
>> + case Hexagon::STrid_indexed_cNotPt :
>> + case Hexagon::STrid_indexed_shl_cPt_V4 :
>> + case Hexagon::POST_STdri_cPt :
>> + case Hexagon::POST_STdri_cNotPt :
>> + case Hexagon::STrih_cPt :
>> + case Hexagon::STrih_cNotPt :
>> +...