search for: streambox

I'm in the process of trying to build a project, and I'm hoping that someone on the list can help me out. I have an Icecast server already running, and some feeds coming in from Simplecast, Edcast, and DarkIce. These encoders are obviously on computers owned by users who can setup feeds are send them to my Icecast server remotely. What I am looking for, is a small PC that is capable

...ll you have to do is embed a "no copy" bit in your stream (even if the stream itself is unencrypted and in the clear), and anyone who builds software that ignores the bit is liable for unlawful circumvention, *even if the recording would otherwise have been fair use.* See Real Networks v. Streambox, 2000 WL 127311 (W.D.Wash. Jan.18, 2000). Anyone want to venture a guess on whether Live365's <smirk> sophisticated <\smirk> anti-copying measure, detailed below, qualifies as a "technological protection measure" under 1201? >Live365 put a large string in one of there...

Looks like the mpeg gestapo are frantically at work cracking down on mpeg projects. Several important projects (tsunami mpeg, gogo, faac, etc) were shut down by the jack booted patent nazis. Since FhG, mpegla, etc plan to start charging royalties on everything even remotely mpeg-related very soon, I expect a lot of interest is going to shift to Vorbis. And soon thereafter, I expect FhG to attack

...embed a "no copy" bit in your stream (even if the > stream itself is unencrypted and in the clear), and anyone who builds > software that ignores the bit is liable for unlawful circumvention, *even if > the recording would otherwise have been fair use.* See Real Networks v. > Streambox, 2000 WL 127311 (W.D.Wash. Jan.18, 2000). > > Anyone want to venture a guess on whether Live365's <smirk> sophisticated > <\smirk> anti-copying measure, detailed below, qualifies as a "technological > protection measure" under 1201? > > >Live365 put a...