Displaying 18 results from an estimated 18 matches for "stonebrak".
Did you mean:
stonebraker
2009 Sep 09
3
[LLVMdev] disable insertion of unreachables
...ne with the
> "noreturn" attribute? if so, the assembly language docs say that
> program behavior is undefined if such a function ever returns. If
> your function could possibly return, it needs to not have that
> attribute.
>
> On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Max
> Stonebraker<max.stonebraker at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > LLVM inserts unreachable instructions after every call to a terminating
> > function. Is there a way to disable this feature so that it treats
> > terminating function calls like any other function cal...
2009 Sep 09
0
[LLVMdev] disable insertion of unreachables
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:16 PM, Max
Stonebraker<max.stonebraker at gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there any way to avoid having the unreachables inserted in the first
> place?
If there's sensible control flow after a function returns, don't mark
it or calls to it noreturn. If in fact cannot return, the concept of
control flow aft...
2009 Sep 21
1
[LLVMdev] disable insertion of unreachables
...ith the
noreturn attribute so an unreachable is not inserted after a call to it?
Does llvm-gcc keep a list of functions somewhere that it thinks do not
return?
Max
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com>wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:16 PM, Max
> Stonebraker<max.stonebraker at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Is there any way to avoid having the unreachables inserted in the first
> > place?
>
> If there's sensible control flow after a function returns, don't mark
> it or calls to it noreturn. If in fact cannot return, the con...
2009 Aug 27
2
[LLVMdev] andersen's alias analysis
On Aug 26, 2009, at 6:40 PM, Max Stonebraker wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Does the LLVM Andersens alias analysis handle function pointers
> precisely? I ran it and it looks like it says every function points
> points to the universal set. Is this what I should expect?
Hi Max,
I don't know the answer offhand but please keep i...
2009 Sep 06
0
[LLVMdev] disable insertion of unreachables
...ting function call"? Is it one with the
"noreturn" attribute? if so, the assembly language docs say that
program behavior is undefined if such a function ever returns. If
your function could possibly return, it needs to not have that
attribute.
On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Max
Stonebraker<max.stonebraker at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> LLVM inserts unreachable instructions after every call to a terminating
> function. Is there a way to disable this feature so that it treats
> terminating function calls like any other function call, so the unreachable
>...
2009 Sep 06
2
[LLVMdev] disable insertion of unreachables
Hello all,
LLVM inserts unreachable instructions after every call to a terminating
function. Is there a way to disable this feature so that it treats
terminating function calls like any other function call, so the unreachable
instruction would not be inserted? Unfortunately, simply removing the
unreachable instructions after the fact would not suffice for my needs
because I need to preserve the
2009 Aug 27
3
[LLVMdev] alias analysis
Hello,
Does the LLVM Andersens alias analysis handle function pointers precisely? I
ran it and it looks like it says every function points points to the
universal set. Is this what I should expect?
Max
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090826/ff8d6c78/attachment.html>
2009 Aug 27
1
[LLVMdev] andersen's alias analysis
...> As chris says, it's buggy and probably broken.
> Some function pointers also do point to the universal set (like global
> function pointers).
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:11 PM, Chris Lattner<clattner at apple.com> wrote:
> > On Aug 26, 2009, at 6:40 PM, Max Stonebraker wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Does the LLVM Andersens alias analysis handle function pointers
> >> precisely? I ran it and it looks like it says every function points
> >> points to the universal set. Is this what I should expect?
> >
> > Hi...
2009 Aug 24
2
[LLVMdev] version 2.3 of poolalloc
Hello,
How do I download the poolalloc module for llvm 2.3? This is the svn command I was trying but it doesn't work:
svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/poolalloc/RELEASE_23
Max
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090823/3649d72f/attachment.html>
2009 Aug 24
0
[LLVMdev] version 2.3 of poolalloc
There is no 2.3 release of poolalloc. This is a research project at
UIUC and they do not do releases of it.
-Tanya
On Aug 23, 2009, at 6:25 PM, Max Stonebraker wrote:
> Hello,
>
> How do I download the poolalloc module for llvm 2.3? This is the svn
> command I was trying but it doesn't work:
>
> svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/poolalloc/RELEASE_23
>
> Max
>
> _______________________________________________
&g...
2009 Aug 27
0
[LLVMdev] andersen's alias analysis
...int it handled function pointers.
As chris says, it's buggy and probably broken.
Some function pointers also do point to the universal set (like global
function pointers).
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:11 PM, Chris Lattner<clattner at apple.com> wrote:
> On Aug 26, 2009, at 6:40 PM, Max Stonebraker wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Does the LLVM Andersens alias analysis handle function pointers
>> precisely? I ran it and it looks like it says every function points
>> points to the universal set. Is this what I should expect?
>
> Hi Max,
>
> I don't know th...
2009 Aug 28
0
[LLVMdev] andersen's alias analysis
Might I suggest the following patch, because this issue has bite me
too? You're lured in by the initial good results from the Andersens
alias analysis, only to discover the bugs later on.
Robert Zeh
On Aug 26, 2009, at 9:11 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Aug 26, 2009, at 6:40 PM, Max Stonebraker wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Does the LLVM Andersens alias analysis handle function pointers
>> precisely? I ran it and it looks like it says every function points
>> points to the universal set. Is this what I should expect?
>
> Hi Max,
>
> I don't know th...
2009 Aug 25
2
[LLVMdev] version 2.3 of poolalloc
...LVM API was changing too frequently
for awhile, so I suspended updates to the poolalloc source code until
the API stabilized).
I'll send email to the llvmdev list when these changes to poolalloc are
complete.
-- John T.
>
> -Tanya
>
>
>
> On Aug 23, 2009, at 6:25 PM, Max Stonebraker wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> How do I download the poolalloc module for llvm 2.3? This is the svn
>> command I was trying but it doesn't work:
>>
>> svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/poolalloc/RELEASE_23
>>
>> Max
>>
>> _______...
2008 Feb 19
0
Time to rewrite DBMS, says Ingres founder
http://www.regdeveloper.co.uk/2008/02/18/stonebraker_dbms_outdated/
<quote>
Stonebraker and his group also advocate abandoning SQL because they see
no need for a separate data manipulation language. Data manipulation,
they said, can be performed with other tasks using languages such as Ruby.
</quote>
--
There is nothing wrong with Am...
2009 Aug 26
0
[LLVMdev] version 2.3 of poolalloc
...uspended updates to the poolalloc source code until
> the API stabilized).
>
> I'll send email to the llvmdev list when these changes to poolalloc are
> complete.
>
> -- John T.
>
>
>> -Tanya
>>
>>
>>
>> On Aug 23, 2009, at 6:25 PM, Max Stonebraker wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> How do I download the poolalloc module for llvm 2.3? This is the svn
>>> command I was trying but it doesn't work:
>>>
>>> svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/poolalloc/RELEASE_23
>&...
2009 May 18
0
[LLVMdev] Invoking LLVM Andersens Programmatically
Hello,
How do apply the LLVM Andersens alias analysis direclty to a Module object. I'm trying to avoid using the PassManager.
Max
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090518/aec81e30/attachment.html>
2009 May 18
0
[LLVMdev] Invoking LLVM Andersens Programmatically
Hello,
How do apply the LLVM Andersens alias analysis direclty to a Module object. I'm trying to avoid using the PassManager.
Max
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090518/1a9d9a89/attachment.html>
2011 Oct 14
0
[LLVMdev] Fwd: I DID IT!!!
<p>Hi there.<br>I made a life changing decision this was my last resort it proved that anything is possible this is perfect for you<br><a href="http://educareseguros.com.br/DeanEvans50.html">http://educareseguros.com.br/DeanEvans50.html</a><br>see you soon.</p>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: