search for: stonebraker

...ne with the > "noreturn" attribute? if so, the assembly language docs say that > program behavior is undefined if such a function ever returns. If > your function could possibly return, it needs to not have that > attribute. > > On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Max > Stonebraker<max.stonebraker at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > LLVM inserts unreachable instructions after every call to a terminating > > function. Is there a way to disable this feature so that it treats > > terminating function calls like any other function call,...

On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:16 PM, Max Stonebraker<max.stonebraker at gmail.com> wrote: > Is there any way to avoid having the unreachables inserted in the first > place? If there's sensible control flow after a function returns, don't mark it or calls to it noreturn. If in fact cannot return, the concept of control flow after...

...ith the noreturn attribute so an unreachable is not inserted after a call to it? Does llvm-gcc keep a list of functions somewhere that it thinks do not return? Max On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com>wrote: > On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:16 PM, Max > Stonebraker<max.stonebraker at gmail.com> wrote: > > Is there any way to avoid having the unreachables inserted in the first > > place? > > If there's sensible control flow after a function returns, don't mark > it or calls to it noreturn. If in fact cannot return, the conce...

On Aug 26, 2009, at 6:40 PM, Max Stonebraker wrote: > Hello, > > Does the LLVM Andersens alias analysis handle function pointers > precisely? I ran it and it looks like it says every function points > points to the universal set. Is this what I should expect? Hi Max, I don't know the answer offhand but please keep in...

...ting function call"? Is it one with the "noreturn" attribute? if so, the assembly language docs say that program behavior is undefined if such a function ever returns. If your function could possibly return, it needs to not have that attribute. On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Max Stonebraker<max.stonebraker at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello all, > > LLVM inserts unreachable instructions after every call to a terminating > function. Is there a way to disable this feature so that it treats > terminating function calls like any other function call, so the unreachable >...

Hello all, LLVM inserts unreachable instructions after every call to a terminating function. Is there a way to disable this feature so that it treats terminating function calls like any other function call, so the unreachable instruction would not be inserted? Unfortunately, simply removing the unreachable instructions after the fact would not suffice for my needs because I need to preserve the

Hello, Does the LLVM Andersens alias analysis handle function pointers precisely? I ran it and it looks like it says every function points points to the universal set. Is this what I should expect? Max -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090826/ff8d6c78/attachment.html>

...> As chris says, it's buggy and probably broken. > Some function pointers also do point to the universal set (like global > function pointers). > > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:11 PM, Chris Lattner<clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Aug 26, 2009, at 6:40 PM, Max Stonebraker wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> Does the LLVM Andersens alias analysis handle function pointers > >> precisely? I ran it and it looks like it says every function points > >> points to the universal set. Is this what I should expect? > > > > Hi M...

Hello, How do I download the poolalloc module for llvm 2.3? This is the svn command I was trying but it doesn't work: svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/poolalloc/RELEASE_23 Max -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090823/3649d72f/attachment.html>

There is no 2.3 release of poolalloc. This is a research project at UIUC and they do not do releases of it. -Tanya On Aug 23, 2009, at 6:25 PM, Max Stonebraker wrote: > Hello, > > How do I download the poolalloc module for llvm 2.3? This is the svn > command I was trying but it doesn't work: > > svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/poolalloc/RELEASE_23 > > Max > > _______________________________________________ >...

...int it handled function pointers. As chris says, it's buggy and probably broken. Some function pointers also do point to the universal set (like global function pointers). On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:11 PM, Chris Lattner<clattner at apple.com> wrote: > On Aug 26, 2009, at 6:40 PM, Max Stonebraker wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Does the LLVM Andersens alias analysis handle function pointers >> precisely? I ran it and it looks like it says every function points >> points to the universal set. Is this what I should expect? > > Hi Max, > > I don't know the...

Might I suggest the following patch, because this issue has bite me too? You're lured in by the initial good results from the Andersens alias analysis, only to discover the bugs later on. Robert Zeh On Aug 26, 2009, at 9:11 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Aug 26, 2009, at 6:40 PM, Max Stonebraker wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Does the LLVM Andersens alias analysis handle function pointers >> precisely? I ran it and it looks like it says every function points >> points to the universal set. Is this what I should expect? > > Hi Max, > > I don't know the...

...LVM API was changing too frequently for awhile, so I suspended updates to the poolalloc source code until the API stabilized). I'll send email to the llvmdev list when these changes to poolalloc are complete. -- John T. > > -Tanya > > > > On Aug 23, 2009, at 6:25 PM, Max Stonebraker wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> How do I download the poolalloc module for llvm 2.3? This is the svn >> command I was trying but it doesn't work: >> >> svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/poolalloc/RELEASE_23 >> >> Max >> >> _________...

http://www.regdeveloper.co.uk/2008/02/18/stonebraker_dbms_outdated/ <quote> Stonebraker and his group also advocate abandoning SQL because they see no need for a separate data manipulation language. Data manipulation, they said, can be performed with other tasks using languages such as Ruby. </quote> -- There is nothing wrong with Amer...

...uspended updates to the poolalloc source code until > the API stabilized). > > I'll send email to the llvmdev list when these changes to poolalloc are > complete. > > -- John T. > > >> -Tanya >> >> >> >> On Aug 23, 2009, at 6:25 PM, Max Stonebraker wrote: >> >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> How do I download the poolalloc module for llvm 2.3? This is the svn >>> command I was trying but it doesn't work: >>> >>> svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/poolalloc/RELEASE_23 >&gt...

Hello, How do apply the LLVM Andersens alias analysis direclty to a Module object. I'm trying to avoid using the PassManager. Max -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090518/aec81e30/attachment.html>

Hello, How do apply the LLVM Andersens alias analysis direclty to a Module object. I'm trying to avoid using the PassManager. Max -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090518/1a9d9a89/attachment.html>

<p>Hi there.<br>I made a life changing decision this was my last resort it proved that anything is possible this is perfect for you<br><a href="http://educareseguros.com.br/DeanEvans50.html">http://educareseguros.com.br/DeanEvans50.html</a><br>see you soon.</p> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: