search for: sto

Looks like a bug as I see tier-enabled = 0 is an additional entry in the info file in shchhv01. As per the code, this field should be written into the glusterd store if the op-version is >= 30706 . What I am guessing is since we didn't have the commit 33f8703a1 "glusterd: regenerate volfiles on op-version bump up" in 3.8.4 while bumping up the op-version the info and volfiles were not regenerated which caused the tier-enabled entry to be miss...

...was attempting the same on a local sandbox and also have the same problem. Current: 3.8.4 Volume Name: shchst01 Type: Distributed-Replicate Volume ID: bcd53e52-cde6-4e58-85f9-71d230b7b0d3 Status: Started Snapshot Count: 0 Number of Bricks: 4 x 3 = 12 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1: shchhv01-sto:/data/brick3/shchst01 Brick2: shchhv02-sto:/data/brick3/shchst01 Brick3: shchhv03-sto:/data/brick3/shchst01 Brick4: shchhv01-sto:/data/brick1/shchst01 Brick5: shchhv02-sto:/data/brick1/shchst01 Brick6: shchhv03-sto:/data/brick1/shchst01 Brick7: shchhv02-sto:/data/brick2/shchst01 Brick8: shchhv03-st...

Yes Atin. I'll take a look. On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Atin Mukherjee <amukherj at redhat.com> wrote: > Looks like a bug as I see tier-enabled = 0 is an additional entry in the > info file in shchhv01. As per the code, this field should be written into > the glusterd store if the op-version is >= 30706 . What I am guessing is > since we didn't have the commit 33f8703a1 "glusterd: regenerate volfiles on > op-version bump up" in 3.8.4 while bumping up the op-version the info and > volfiles were not regenerated which caused the tier-enabled e...

I have not done the upgrade yet. Since this is a production cluster I need to make sure it stays up or schedule some downtime if it doesn't doesn't. Thanks. On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Atin Mukherjee <amukherj at redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 1:10 AM, Ziemowit Pierzycki <ziemowit at pierzycki.com> > wrote: >> >> Hi, >>

...ed to ACLs and METADATA. The problem appears when a user only has the 'l' (lookup) permission on a folder and later tries to get METADATA from all his or her folders; a sample session to ilustrate the problem: A1 GETACL "foo" * ACL foo admin akxeilprwtscd -admin "" sto at iti.es lrwstipekxacd A1 OK Getacl completed. A2 SETACL "foo" sto at iti.es l A2 OK Setacl complete. A3 GETACL "foo" * ACL foo admin akxeilprwtscd -admin "" sto at iti.es al A3 OK Getacl completed. A4 GETMETADATA "foo" (/private/vendor/kolab/f...

Hi All, I would like to use Kennard-Stone algorithm for splitting a dataset. > mydata <- read.csv(url("http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/r/dae/binary.csv ")) > library("soil.spec") > ken.sto(mydata,per.n=0.3) Error in ken.sto(mydata, per.n = 0.3) : subscript out of bounds I found that other people run into th...

Hello. I'm trying to make some graphics with nationalized labels (pdf for use in LaTeX document). On console (displayed on screen) using all looks ok: ----------------------------------------\/ data<-rnorm(100) hist(data,main='Rozk?ad g?sto?ci punkt?w', xlab='Warto?? na osi y', ylab='Cz?sto?? wyst?powania') -------------------------------------------/\ But using: -------------------------------------------\/ data<-rnorm(100) pdf('plik.pdf',encoding="CP1250.enc") hist(data,main='Rozk?ad g?...

Hi R-programmers ! I would like to perform a linear model regressio using the 'lm' function and i don't know how to do it. The data is organised as below: Month ExcessReturn Return STO 8 0.047595875 0.05274292 0.854352503 8 0.016134874 0.049226941 4.399372005 8 -0.000443869 0.004357305 -1.04980297 9 0.002206554 -0.089068828 0.544809429 9 0.021296551 0.003795071 0.226875834 9 0.006741578 0.014104606 0.721986383 the model is: ExcessReturn= a + b1*Return + b2*STO...

Hi R-programmers ! I would like to perform a linear model regression month by month using the 'lm' function and i don't know how to do it. The data is organised as below: Month ExcessReturn Return STO 8 0.047595875 0.05274292 0.854352503 8 0.016134874 0.049226941 4.399372005 8 -0.000443869 0.004357305 -1.04980297 9 0.002206554 -0.089068828 0.544809429 9 0.021296551 0.003795071 0.226875834 9 0.006741578 0.014104606 0.721986383 the model is: ExcessReturn= a + b1*Return + b2*STO...

.../dns_update.c:395(handle_one_update) Looking at record: [2013/02/28 16:29:57, 2] ../source4/dns_server/dns_update.c:396(handle_one_update) [2013/02/28 16:29:57, 1] ../librpc/ndr/ndr.c:245(ndr_print_debug) discard_const(update): struct dns_res_rec name : 'sto-print01.corp.lo' rr_type : DNS_QTYPE_AAAA (0x1C) rr_class : DNS_QCLASS_ANY (0xFF) ttl : 0x00000000 (0) length : 0x0000 (0) rdata : union dns_rdata(case 0x...

...27 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25 ... $ tl : num 226 208 226 226 234 ... $ sex: Factor w/ 2 levels "female","male": 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ... $ Gf : num 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ... $ Gm : num 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ... # starting values > sLinf <- 405 > sK <- 0.11 > sto <- -5.2 > svb <- list(Linf=sLinf,K=sK,to=sto) # Fit the additive error structure model to both groups combined > vbla <- nls(tl~Linf*(1-exp(-K*(age-to))),start=svb,data=fwd) > summary(vbl1) Formula: tl ~ Linf * (1 - exp(-K * (age - to))) Parameters: Estimate...

Certainly a calculator supports arithmetic :-) The TI 58/59 support things such as 1 3 STO IND 02 which, if memory 02 currently holds "42", will store 13 into memory 42. So, yes, there are pointers. And address arithmetic. On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 11:30 AM, Friedman, Eli via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 3/14/2018 8:53 AM, via llvm-dev wrote: &gt...

...(up to 960 steps) and registers (up to 100). A register consumes 8 program steps, reducing the program size accordingly. The most tricky part is the following: a simple instruction like MOV R1,N may require more or less bytes to be coded. For instance: MOV R1,1 will require 3 bytes: (key) 1, STO, 01. MOV R2,345 will require 5 bytes: (key) 3, (key) 4, (key) 5, STO, 02. How to cope with such an instruction? Can llvm be used to generate the right bytecode? Any idea is welcome ! Thanks for your support. Best regards Philippe

...: setfacl -m u:administrator:rwx test3.txt setfacl: test3.txt: Malformed access ACL `user::rw-,group::r--,group:adm:rwx,mask::rwx,other::r--,user:4294967295:rwx': Missing or wrong entry at entry 6 Byt when I try to set a group I don't get any error, but the settings does not stick: root at sto-file01:/var/files# setfacl -m g:"domain users":rwx test3.txt root at sto-file01:/var/files# getfacl test3.txt # file: test3.txt # owner: root # group: root user::rw- group::r-- group:adm:rwx mask::rwx other::r-- My smb.conf: # Global parameters [global] workgroup = CORP realm = corp....

http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/file/n3031344/RSV.Rdata RSV.Rdata I want to split my dataset to training set and test set using kennard-stone(KS) algorithm, it is lucky there is R packages soil.spec to implement it. but when I used it to my dataset, it does not work, who can help me, how reasons is it, below, it is my code, and my data in the attachment. ks<-ken.sto(x,per="TRUE",per.n=0.3,va="FALSE",sav="F...

Hello there, I''m currently building a plugin, for which I need a before_save callback. The method I want to call is in module InstanceMethods, but when I add a before_save foo, foo, as defined as an InstanceMethod, never gets called. This is the first plugin I''m building, after only two weeks of fiddling with Ruby and Rails, so if anyone is kind enough to help me out.... :)

Hello Bruce and Eli, Yes, you are definitely right: indirect access to registers is possible through IND XX instruction. So, no worry on that side. My concern is about STO instruction description in TI59InstrInfo.td file. It looks impossible to me to categorize this instruction as a "classical" N-bytes long instruction (as N fully depends on the value you want to store). Could it be a show stopper to implement a backend ? BR Philippe ----- Mail original -...

...nd registers (up to 100). A register consumes 8 program steps, reducing the program size accordingly. > > The most tricky part is the following: a simple instruction like MOV R1,N may require more or less bytes to be coded. For instance: > > MOV R1,1 will require 3 bytes: (key) 1, STO, 01. > MOV R2,345 will require 5 bytes: (key) 3, (key) 4, (key) 5, STO, 02. > > How to cope with such an instruction? Can llvm be used to generate the right bytecode? From your description, it sounds like the architecture doesn't support pointers or integer arithmetic; that prob...

...d? I am *not* > saying security through obscurity = security, but many IDS/IPS/anti-port > scanners will begin defensive actions when you plow through ports looking > for ssh connection. So instead of being an easier 1 port script kiddie > target you *layer* defenses (including possible STO). Basically anything to > slow down or deter or prevent an attack is good IMHO. > > Just my 2cents of course. > > pjwelsh > > On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Theodor Sigurjon Andresson < > TheodorSiAn at kvenno.is> wrote: > >> In there you are almost telling p...

In there you are almost telling people that security through obscurity is a good way. That might sometimes be true but in this case it could mean that you would be handing passwords and other data out. When you start SSH on port 22 it is done with root privileges because the root user is the only one that can use ports below 1024. Root is the only user that can listen to that port or do