search for: stifles

In some code that I have written, use of url() is generating the output line: "cannot open: HTTP status was `404 Not Found`" The problem is that I do not want R to be outputting any error messages - I have 'internet.info' set to 3, show.error.messages set to FALSE and the url() wrapped in a try(). When the URL is not found I am already handling it in a manner consistent with

I can tell you that at least on the LLDB side, it was significantly stifling our development efforts. The requirement that embedding Python means you have to compile Python with the same compiler that you compile the program you're embedding it in, and the fact that the only supported toolchain for Python 2.7 is VC 2008, and the fact that Python 2.7 doesn't even compile with VC 2015, we

I just inherited a client that is using a Switchvox system. I normally install a CentOS based system with freePBX and some custom endpoint management stuff for Polycom phones. This Switchvox is making me feel a bit stifled. I am having nightmares of another recent encounter with Trixbox Pro. Can I really not ssh into this box? If I could is there anything useful that I might change

Greetings all, I am getting an error message that is stifling me. Any ideas? > ## Define Directories ## > load_from <- "/home/mcc/Dropbox/abrodsky/kegg_combine_data/" > save_to <- "/home/mcc/Dropbox/abrodsky/ttest_results/" > > ############################### > ## Define Columns To Compare ## > compareA <- "log_b_rich" > compareB

On Saturday, April 6, 2013, Jeff Bezanson wrote: > > Presumably the optimizer benefits from taking advantage of the > undefined behavior, but to get a consistent result you need to check > for both zero and this case, which is an awful lot of checks. Yes they > will branch predict well, but this still can't be good, for code size > if nothing else. How much performance can

On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Zachary Turner via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I think it's been a little over a year since we bumped the minimum VS > version to 2013. Are we planning to do the same for 2015? Update 2 is > releasing soon, which is stable enough at least to ship Chromium. In the past, we've supported the latest two major versions of

I'm also not fully happy with LLVM's behavior here. There is another undefined case too, which is the minimum integer divided by -1. In Julia I can get "random" answers by doing: julia> sdiv_int(-9223372036854775808, -1) 87106304 julia> sdiv_int(-9223372036854775808, -1) 87108096 In other contexts where the arguments are not constant, this typically gives an FPE trap.

One thing that we are often blamed for is trying to stifle conversations and to discourage people from commenting / contributing / encouraging conversations. And that cant be further from the truth, really. We are all pro-community ( and when I say we, I mean everyone - including the contributors, developers, admins, users, abusers and hey upstream too ). However, one thing that does get in

Hello to all, Its been requested that I stifle the /lib/tls warning given even with xen-friendly libc6 because init was compiled otherwise. I got the deb sources for sysvinit from Ubuntu, which build just fine. The last time I tried this I ended up breaking signals to init (even though /dev/initctl was there and 666) and could not reboot. So for a new server, I''m going to : Base

dear members, I am using R to model stock prices but a slow "for" loop has stifled my research. I am using Rcpp to speed up my "for" loop. I am also using RcppEigen to implement block operations on xts objects..... how do I use RcppEigen? If I just load it by: > require(RcppEigen) it is not recognising the .block method in C++. If I include it inside

Ben Lindstrom wrote (a very long time ago) : >The problem is in some cases the data being sent to you may be out of >order (thankful no sftp server does this yet). So reget/reput without RFC >clearifications can lead to bad file transfers. > >I'm trying to drag up in my mind which one was the problem... I believe >reput is fine since the client has control over the

I think it's been a little over a year since we bumped the minimum VS version to 2013. Are we planning to do the same for 2015? Update 2 is releasing soon, which is stable enough at least to ship Chromium <https://randomascii.wordpress.com/2016/03/24/compiler-bugs-found-when-porting-chromium-to-vc-2015/> . Language wise, 2015 comes with a lot of new C++ features. The most interesting

On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 1:04 PM Jon Roelofs via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> >> >> On Friday, May 6, 2016, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: >> >>> On 6 May 2016 at 19:34, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>

On 4/2/2016 11:07 AM, David Winsemius wrote: >> On Apr 1, 2016, at 5:01 PM, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On 01/04/2016 6:46 PM, Bert Gunter wrote: >>> ... of course, whether one **should** get them is questionable... >> They're just statistics. How could it hurt to look at them? > Like Rolf, I thought that this utterance

I'm running 7.0-RELEASE-i386 on Jetway's NC92-N230 mainboard. The board has one integrated RTL8168/8111 gigabit NIC as well as an expansion board with three RTL8168/8111 NICs. Why would the three NICs work while the onboard NIC does not? none2@pci0:1:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x816810ec chip=0x816810ec rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Realtek Semiconductor' device

On Friday, May 6, 2016, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 6 May 2016 at 19:34, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com <javascript:;>> > wrote: > > This isn't just about what we can do today, but about explaining it to > > people who haven't seen us do it/don't know what the community norms > are. So > > that when

On Sep 18, 2013, at 8:58 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > On Sep 17, 2013, at 10:10 AM, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> wrote: >> LLVM's internal command line library needs to evolve. We have an immediate need to build LLVM as a library free of static initializers, but before brute-force fixing this problem, I'd like outline the incremental steps

> On Apr 1, 2016, at 5:01 PM, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 01/04/2016 6:46 PM, Bert Gunter wrote: >> ... of course, whether one **should** get them is questionable... > > They're just statistics. How could it hurt to look at them? Like Rolf, I thought that this utterance on April 1 deserved fortune enshrinement. It reminded me of one

On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 4:13 PM, James Courtier-Dutton <james.dutton at gmail.com> wrote: > Jovi, > > The problem with kernel module binary compatibility is that if you > fixed the kernel module binary API, it will stifle innovation within > the kernel. > So, to the kernel developers, a changing module API is a bonus feature > and not an issue. I expect you will have no

In my SuSE updates this morning, I found "Bug fixes for i810/Radeon graphics drivers"... -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net PGP Public Key \ https://lists.shorewall.net/teastep.pgp.key