search for: stifle

In some code that I have written, use of url() is generating the output line: "cannot open: HTTP status was `404 Not Found`" The problem is that I do not want R to be outputting any error messages - I have 'internet.info' set to 3, show.error.messages set to FALSE and the url() wrapped in a try(). When the URL is not found I am already handling it in a manner consistent with

I can tell you that at least on the LLDB side, it was significantly stifling our development efforts. The requirement that embedding Python means you have to compile Python with the same compiler that you compile the program you're embedding it in, and the fact that the only supported toolchain for Python 2.7 is VC 2008, and the fact that Python 2.7 doesn't even compile with VC 2015, we

I just inherited a client that is using a Switchvox system. I normally install a CentOS based system with freePBX and some custom endpoint management stuff for Polycom phones. This Switchvox is making me feel a bit stifled. I am having nightmares of another recent encounter with Trixbox Pro. Can I really not ssh into this box? If I could is there anything useful that I might change without breaking things and/or endangering their warranty or support? Google seems to be very quiet about customer experiences w...

Greetings all, I am getting an error message that is stifling me. Any ideas? > ## Define Directories ## > load_from <- "/home/mcc/Dropbox/abrodsky/kegg_combine_data/" > save_to <- "/home/mcc/Dropbox/abrodsky/ttest_results/" > > ############################### > ## Define Columns To Compare ## > compareA <- "log_b_rich" > compareB

...evel languages like Julia that want to provide efficiency but also give defined behavior to all user-exposed cases, I think adding an LLVM intrinsic to represent division that's defined to trap on division by zero or overflow would be the best solution. Since the trap is a side effect, it would stifle optimization of code that used the intrinsic, but the intrinsic could still be lowered to a single hardware instruction and avoid the branching and code bloat of manual checks on hardware where division by zero natively traps. -Joe -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scr...

On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Zachary Turner via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I think it's been a little over a year since we bumped the minimum VS > version to 2013. Are we planning to do the same for 2015? Update 2 is > releasing soon, which is stable enough at least to ship Chromium. In the past, we've supported the latest two major versions of

I'm also not fully happy with LLVM's behavior here. There is another undefined case too, which is the minimum integer divided by -1. In Julia I can get "random" answers by doing: julia> sdiv_int(-9223372036854775808, -1) 87106304 julia> sdiv_int(-9223372036854775808, -1) 87108096 In other contexts where the arguments are not constant, this typically gives an FPE trap.

One thing that we are often blamed for is trying to stifle conversations and to discourage people from commenting / contributing / encouraging conversations. And that cant be further from the truth, really. We are all pro-community ( and when I say we, I mean everyone - including the contributors, developers, admins, users, abusers and hey upstream too...

Hello to all, Its been requested that I stifle the /lib/tls warning given even with xen-friendly libc6 because init was compiled otherwise. I got the deb sources for sysvinit from Ubuntu, which build just fine. The last time I tried this I ended up breaking signals to init (even though /dev/initctl was there and 666) and could not reboot. So...

dear members, I am using R to model stock prices but a slow "for" loop has stifled my research. I am using Rcpp to speed up my "for" loop. I am also using RcppEigen to implement block operations on xts objects..... how do I use RcppEigen? If I just load it by: > require(RcppEigen) it is not recognising the .block method in C++. If I include it inside the cp...

...fers are denied. > >if the RFC get clarified to disallow out of order transfers then a cleaned >up version of this patch may not have a problem getting in. It seems everyone body has a patch for this but it still can't quite make it into any official distribution. Not wanting to stifle technical progress down surely the standards body have mechanism to allow new concepts to be experimentally deployed without affecting non-cooperating parties ? Is it really necessary to get RFC clarification on this, maybe its useful to leave as-is and have the option to execute out-of-order...

I think it's been a little over a year since we bumped the minimum VS version to 2013. Are we planning to do the same for 2015? Update 2 is releasing soon, which is stable enough at least to ship Chromium <https://randomascii.wordpress.com/2016/03/24/compiler-bugs-found-when-porting-chromium-to-vc-2015/> . Language wise, 2015 comes with a lot of new C++ features. The most interesting

On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 1:04 PM Jon Roelofs via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> >> >> On Friday, May 6, 2016, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: >> >>> On 6 May 2016 at 19:34, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>

...ations have on the intellectual heritage of humanity. This relates to R, because R is based on an assumption that the dissemination of publications, articles and software, for which the authors are not remunerated from copyright proceeds should not be limited by pre-internet rules that stifle unnecessarily the distribution of knowledge and with it improvements in productivity and economic growth. Best Wishes, Spencer Graves

I'm running 7.0-RELEASE-i386 on Jetway's NC92-N230 mainboard. The board has one integrated RTL8168/8111 gigabit NIC as well as an expansion board with three RTL8168/8111 NICs. Why would the three NICs work while the onboard NIC does not? none2@pci0:1:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x816810ec chip=0x816810ec rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Realtek Semiconductor' device

On Friday, May 6, 2016, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 6 May 2016 at 19:34, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com <javascript:;>> > wrote: > > This isn't just about what we can do today, but about explaining it to > > people who haven't seen us do it/don't know what the community norms > are. So > > that when

...overall design of the command line options. We already have some manual name mangling/namespacification of options (e.g. -tail-dup-limit=). Perhaps we should formalize this somehow? Obviously, based on the 18 responses I've gotten, the tone of my first email was misleading. I don’t want to stifle discussion, but to be clear, the only thing I propose to tackle immediately is the removal of static initializers from libraries. There are several isolated issues that Filip has found good workarounds for. cl::opt is the one pervasive problem that can't be weeded out one case at a time. The p...

> On Apr 1, 2016, at 5:01 PM, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 01/04/2016 6:46 PM, Bert Gunter wrote: >> ... of course, whether one **should** get them is questionable... > > They're just statistics. How could it hurt to look at them? Like Rolf, I thought that this utterance on April 1 deserved fortune enshrinement. It reminded me of one

On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 4:13 PM, James Courtier-Dutton <james.dutton at gmail.com> wrote: > Jovi, > > The problem with kernel module binary compatibility is that if you > fixed the kernel module binary API, it will stifle innovation within > the kernel. > So, to the kernel developers, a changing module API is a bonus feature > and not an issue. I expect you will have no support from the LKML. > What is it in your current kernel driver that prevents it from being > open sourced? > What stops you fro...

In my SuSE updates this morning, I found "Bug fixes for i810/Radeon graphics drivers"... -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net PGP Public Key \ https://lists.shorewall.net/teastep.pgp.key