search for: stewards

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 30 matches for "stewards".

Did you mean: steward
2003 Sep 09
6
3.6p2 build errors on buffer_get with latest portable/SNAP
Tried the user discussion list to no avail, can't get 3.6.p2 portable running due to buffer_get errors. Does the latest portable SNAP incorporate the latest patches? Running Red Hat 8.0 AS SHIPPED /usr/sbin/sshd ... cool, listens on 22 with 3.4p1 WITH 3.6.1p2 ./configure make make install ... /usr/local/sbin/sshd -t -f /usr/local/etc/sshd_config buffer_get: trying to get more bytes 1 than
2012 Jul 20
9
[LLVMdev] RFC: Staging area proposal for new backends
Hi, I would like to follow up on the recent discussion on the mailing list about requirements for new backends[1] by submitting the following proposal for a staging area for new LLVM backends. This proposal incorporates ideas from Owen, Chandler, and others who chimed in on the original thread, and I hope the LLVM developers will be able to come to a consensus on this proposal or a modified
2012 Sep 06
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: Staging area proposal for new backends
Hi, Now that --enable-experimental-targets build flags have been added to the build systems. What needs to be done in order to get the R600 backend added as an experimental target? I've posted an updated version of the backend to llvm-commits[1], that addresses many of the criticisms of the backend, but I haven't received any feedback, and I feel like the submission process has stalled.
2012 Jul 27
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: Staging area proposal for new backends
Hi, I would like to try to keep the staging area discussion going. There seems to be a general consensus that a staging area for backends and also new features would be acceptable for the LLVM project. What actions are required to make the staging area a reality? Is more discussion needed? Is anyone willing to volunteer to be the "Code Owner" for the staging area, to help move the
2012 Sep 08
1
[LLVMdev] RFC: Staging area proposal for new backends
Dear Tom, Looks like setting LCOMMDirectiveType in AMDGPUMCAsmInfo.cpp is not needed anymore? I commented it out, and then LLVM got compiled fine. - D. 2012/9/6 Tom Stellard <tstellar at gmail.com>: > Hi, > > Now that --enable-experimental-targets build flags have been added to > the build systems. What needs to be done in order to get the R600 > backend added as an
2012 Jul 27
2
[LLVMdev] RFC: Staging area proposal for new backends
On 07/27/2012 01:01 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to try to keep the staging area discussion going. There > seems to be a general consensus that a staging area for backends and also > new features would be acceptable for the LLVM project. What actions > are required to make the staging area a reality? Is more discussion > needed? Is anyone willing to
2008 Jan 10
14
Keeping Camping going
Hello all, I''m not sure who Camping''s steward is at this point(zimbatm? _why?), but I haven''t seen much activity in quite some time. I really like Camping, and I understand open source projects can fall by the wayside. So, I''d be willing to take over maintenance and releasing. I have experience maintaining my own open source projects, and a history of
2012 Jul 27
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: Staging area proposal for new backends
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 01:30:49PM -0400, Justin Holewinski wrote: > On 07/27/2012 01:01 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: > >Hi, > > > >I would like to try to keep the staging area discussion going. There > >seems to be a general consensus that a staging area for backends and also > >new features would be acceptable for the LLVM project. What actions > >are required
2012 Jul 22
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: Staging area proposal for new backends
On Jul 20, 2012, at 8:51 AM, Tom Stellard wrote: > The goals of the staging area will be: > 1. Facilitate communication between the LLVM project and backend > developers > 2. Ensure that new backends meet LLVM standards > 3. Give the backend more exposure to users and prospective developers FWIW, I really like this idea or concept, but we have to be careful for it to be done
2017 Oct 21
2
Why dup(), again and again?
On Fri, 20 Oct 2017, David Newall wrote: > WHAT CAN I DO TO HELP STEWARD THIS CHANGE INTO THE MASTER SOURCE? > What do I need to do? Stop yelling and go file a bug at https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/ As I mentioned previously, your suggested change is wrong and we'd (at least) need to replace fd 1 with /dev/null prior to assigning it to the channel. -d
2008 Mar 18
2
Server to server communication
Hi all, I have 2 servers online and wish them to communicate and exchange information with each other at times. I have been developing a web application which is extremely CPU-intensive, and since I don't want to overload the main server which deals with the apache/php/mysql stuff, I got a separate server (a phenom) to deal with it. I prefer the communication to be secure, low latency,
2017 Oct 20
3
Why dup()?
I've been using ssh without it duping stdout and stderr, and had no problems.? I think this change should be made to the master source. WHAT IS THE PROBLEM WITH SSH RIGHT NOW? It duplicates FILENO_STDOUT and FILENO_STDERR, thus there are two descriptors for each of these files.? When the remote program closes its stdout or stderr, the remote sshd sends the appropriate message to the local
2012 Jul 23
2
[LLVMdev] RFC: Staging area proposal for new backends
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 8:08 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > On Jul 20, 2012, at 8:51 AM, Tom Stellard wrote: > > The goals of the staging area will be: > > 1. Facilitate communication between the LLVM project and backend > > developers > > 2. Ensure that new backends meet LLVM standards > > 3. Give the backend more exposure to
2013 Apr 29
2
Sharing data between nodes with hiera
I have this, I think common, situation: - NodeDB VM with MySQL - NodeApp VM with an application that uses the MySQL DB Obivuously both needs to have information on the DB (like user, DB name, etc.) Since DB will be created in the NodeDB by the MySQL module from puppetlabs and the app will just connect to the DB and do its work, but need to set the configuration parameters. Now ... since App
2012 Jul 23
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: Staging area proposal for new backends
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 10:21:57AM -0400, Justin Holewinski wrote: > On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 8:08 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > > On Jul 20, 2012, at 8:51 AM, Tom Stellard wrote: > > > The goals of the staging area will be: > > > 1. Facilitate communication between the LLVM project and backend > > > developers > > >
2005 Sep 12
13
Skype purchased by Ebay 2.6 Billion
Good news for service providers in my opinion, Ebay will likely start alienating Skype users like they did with Paypal users. "SkypeSucks.com" domain already taken, shucks.... http://www.kesq.com/Global/story.asp?S=3837895 -- Cory J Andrews Partner / Purchasing +++++++++++++++ VOIPSupply.com - Everything you need for VOIP 454 Sonwil Drive Buffalo, NY 14225 +++++++++++++++ tf voice
1999 May 11
0
Printing fails above a certain size
It was suggested here at my work that we get a monitorless NT station so that the Windows PCs could print on our predominantly Sun network. I suggested Samba and had it set up fairly easily (quite nice). I'm running Samba on a RedHat 5.2 system on an Intel chip. The installation went mostly fine. I just had to make the Samba spool directory world writable for the printing to work. When
2014 Jan 08
1
Extract PDF portfolio
Hi, I am searching for a command line tool to extract files from a pdf portfolio? Are there any capabilities to do this? Thanks in advance! Kind regards, Nicole
2011 Nov 01
3
CrossOver license
Hey guys, I have a question about CrossOver and the LGPL license. I'm looking into licensing some software of my own and I'm not sure if I can. >From what I've read the LGPL license doesn't allow any product to be sold if it's based on LGPL protected software, unless it uses the software simply as a plug-in: > A program that contains no derivative of any portion of the
2009 Dec 28
2
What might be the security issues from installing R?
I work in a US government office, where regular computer users are not allowed Admin access to their computers, and all software must go through an extensive evaluation to be approved for installation and use. Several of us in my office would greatly benefit from R, so I'd like to request that it go through the approval process. Does anyone out there have any experience or advice to share?