search for: statemant

Dear R users, I would like to calculate a cumulative sum as following: on the i-th row, in the j-th column of a matrix, I would like to obtain the sum of the (i-1) preceding elements of this j-th column. Could I avoid a "for" loop? Thank you, Tristan Lorino ---------------------- ?cole Nationale V?t?rinaire d'Alfort - http://www.vet-alfort.fr, T?l. 01 43 96 70 33 M?l. tlorino at

Hi! To convince one of our customer to use samba, we need a good reference. In the survey I found an entry of the "Bank of America". If the entry is right they are using 1200 Samba servers with 15000 clients. Is that right? Is there any article or official statemant available, which is public available to convince the "decision makers". Who know other huge Samba installations? Yours T. Uhl ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Thomas Uhl uhl@think.de T...

DISCLAIMER: I am SSA, LLVM and compiler ignorant, so take the following for what it is worth. What about logically breaking a (complex) SEH method into two logical methods, as per this pseudo-code as an example: ----------------------- foo(parameter-list) { leading-statements; try { try-statements; } catch(Execption0 ex0) { catch-0-statements; } . catch(ExceptionN exN) {

HPUX 10.20 / Samba 2.0.6 The owners of a share can create, edit, delete any all files from any MS office tools ASCII files what ever . . . but with a PC based application that is a database controlled by metadata files and locking files they get the "standard cannot write filename" UNLESS the "Force Create Mode" is set to 0777. The log file for this workstation / user gives:

I'm having a problem to upgrade the Samba version from 2.0.8 to 3.0.10 from sunfreeware.com. All works fine witch the exception of one application called StateMate. It works fine with the old Samba 2.0.8 but when I use Samba 3.0.10 I only get Segmentaion Fault when I try to start the application. Perhaps the oplocks or something makes the application to segmentation fault. Any ideas?

...ent as belonging to that post. Now, when I try to incorporate everything all into a very easy page to navigate I can''t use the same code associations and my comments fail. app/views/posts/index.html.erb <% div_for( post ) do %> <h3><%= link_to_unless_current h(post.title), statemant %></h3> <p class="timestamp"> Posted <%=h time_ago_in_words(post.created_at) %> ago </p> <p> Approved: <%= h(post.approved) %> </p> <p class="post_post"> <%= simple_format h(post.body) %> </p> <% randomN...

Hi, > What about logically breaking a (complex) SEH method into two logical > methods, as per this pseudo-code as an example: > > ----------------------- > > foo(parameter-list) > { > leading-statements; > > try { > try-statements; > } > catch(Execption0 ex0) { > catch-0-statements; > } > . > catch(ExceptionN exN) { >

On May 8, 2008, at 9:35 PM, Nick Lewycky wrote: > Talin wrote: >> Currently it states in the language manual that the results of >> division >> by zero are undefined. However, I'm curious as to how you would >> normally >> handle either divide by zero or other "hardware" exceptions (null >> pointer dereference and so on) and turn them into

Hello, the following patches should get multidisk access working. The syntax accepted is the following: (hdx,y)/path/to/file where x is the disk number and start at 0 and the y is the partition number starting at 1. So (hd0,1) is the first partition of the first disk. the other accepted syntax is using MBR's 32 bits disk signature so for example: (mbr:0x12345678,2)/foo/bar would address