search for: ssnyder

...? > > Thanks > > -- > Matthew Bunce > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Sat, 02 Jan 1999 17:02:03 +0100 > From: "Robert Dahlem" <Robert.Dahlem@frankfurt.netsurf.de> > To: "Multiple recipients of list" <samba@samba.org>, "ssnyder@indy.net" <ssnyder@indy.net> > Subject: Re: Encrypted passwords and OS2/Win95/Win98 > Message-ID: <199901021604.RAA08570@beach.frankfurt.netsurf.de> > > Steve, > > On Wed, 30 Dec 1998 02:17:00 +1100, Steve Snyder wrote: > > >My LAN is running Samba v1.9.1...

...sn.ru> > 5) Re: From UNIX to PC ? > by Benjamin Scott <bscott@hamptonsys.com> > 6) Re: From UNIX to PC > by "Tajthy Tamas" <tajthy@mail.euroweb.hu> > 7) Encrypted passwords and OS2/Win95/Win98 > by "Steve Snyder" <ssnyder@indy.net> > 8) Re: From UNIX to PC ? > by afan@www.jeonet.com (Afan Ottenheimer) > 9) Re: mapped drives do not appear > by "Stephen L Arnold" <arnold.steve@ensco.com> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------...

...5 | DSS key ID: 0xD2AB2220 > Obtain via finger, Web, or email with subject "Send RSA" or "Send DSS" > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1998 10:01:27 -0500 (EST) > From: Benjamin Scott <bscott@hamptonsys.com> > To: Steve Snyder <ssnyder@indy.net> > Subject: Re: Encrypted passwords and OS2/Win95/Win98 > Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.05.9812300950170.2068-100000@benden.hamptonsys.com> > > On Tue, 29 Dec 1998, Steve Snyder wrote: > > If I reconfigure Samba to use encrypted passwords, won't that effectively &g...

A follow-up to the telephone message I left for you today: We just got the carmel corn, but can't recall if we've paid for it yet? Have we? If not how much do we owe you? ***** Steve Snyder *****

Given that I only have 10 client machines which could access Samba (v1.9.18p3), does it make any sense increase the "interface" mask to reduce the number of addresses broadcasted to? That is, would a parameter of interface = 192.168.0.1/28 be less of a burden on Samba that the standard 8-bit interface = 192.168.0.1/24 range of broadcast addresses? Thank you. *****

Since Samba v2.0.2 was announced I've been waiting for it to show up in RedHat RPM/SRPM format. So far, it hasn't shown up on any of the Samba mirror sites. Will RPM/SRPM packages be made available for v2.0.2? Thank you. *** Steve Snyder ***

I often find with Samba v2.0.3 that files accessed via Win95 (OSR2) stay locked forever after exiting the application that used them. I've got an application called Visual SlickEdit (VSE), which is installed on a shared drive. The drive is an exported Samba share from my RedHat v5.2 (kernel v2.2.5) server. Both the Win32 and OS/2 versions of VSE are installed beneath the same subdirectory

My LAN is running Samba v1.9.18p10 under RedHat Linux v5.2. Using the SMB services are Win95 and OS/2 clients. It's all running fine. I will soon be adding Win98, though, and I understand that there is a question of password encryption. I'm concerned how the encrypted/plain-text communication of password will affect my existing configuration. If I reconfigure Samba to use encrypted

My Samba-shared printers (v2.0.3) printers worked great until I updated several software packages last weekend. These printers are networked and can still be used by running lpr from the command line of my Linux (RedHat v5.2, kernel 2.2.5) server. Print jobs sent from the client machines (OS/2 and Win98) are not printed. A job sent from a client machine is apparently just lost. Nothing

In the course of tracking down a problem in Samba v2.0.4a, I set "debuglevel=3" and noticed something strange in the log file. While attempting to find the netlogon script, a number of variations on the name are tried (e.g. for Windows, it's *.COM, *.EXE, *.BAT). Here's the strangeness: the file NETLOGON"BAT is also looked for. Yes, that's a quotation mark in place