Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "sslip".
Did you mean:
slip
2023 Aug 18
2
Host key verification (known_hosts) with ProxyJump/ProxyCommand
...not significant, you can tell ssh to not record
> them ("CheckHostIP no").
If I understand correctly, you need to *know* the target system's local
172-ish IP to be able to log in. If so, and your DNS admin frowns at
setting up 16 million RRs to cover 172.0.0.0/8 in preparation, sslip.io
might be helpful.
https://sslip.io/
Otherwise, and assuming a *manageable* (mainly, enumerable) population
of remote sites, I wonder whether this approach might work, too?
Host Perth-47
HostName 172.23.45.47
ProxyJump Perth-GW
GlobalKnownHostsFile /dev/null
UserKnownHostsFile ~/.ssh/k...
2007 Jan 17
11
scope issue after upgrade
I just upgraded to 0.22.0 from 0.18.4 and I''m running into what I think
are problems due to changes in scope rules.
In my site.pp manifest, I have the following:
import "classes/*"
node nfsserver {
include nfsserver
}
node webserver {
include webserver
}
class cluster1_sites {
website {
"example.com": ...;
"example2.com": ...;
}
}
node
2023 Aug 18
1
Host key verification (known_hosts) with ProxyJump/ProxyCommand
...n tell ssh to not record
>> them ("CheckHostIP no").
>
> If I understand correctly, you need to *know* the target system's local
> 172-ish IP to be able to log in. If so, and your DNS admin frowns at
> setting up 16 million RRs to cover 172.0.0.0/8 in preparation, sslip.io
> might be helpful.
>
> https://sslip.io/
That's a handy little service? not sure of its long-term stability
though for production use, but one to have a closer look at and keep in
the memory bank.
It's not so much the DNS admin frowning on its use. I think the subnets
i...