Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "ssfi".
Did you mean:
sfi
2009 May 21
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Add new phase to legalization to handle vector operations
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Dan Gohman <gohman at apple.com> wrote:
> Can you explain why you chose the approach of using a new pass?
> I pictured removing LegalizeDAG's type legalization code would
> mostly consist of finding all the places that use TLI.getTypeAction
> and just deleting code for handling its Expand and Promote. Are you
> anticipating something more
2009 May 20
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Add new phase to legalization to handle vector operations
On May 20, 2009, at 1:34 PM, Eli Friedman wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Eli Friedman
> <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Per subject, this patch adding an additional pass to handle vector
>>
>> operations; the idea is that this allows removing the code from
>>
>> LegalizeDAG that handles illegal types, which should be a significant
2009 May 21
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Add new phase to legalization to handle vector operations
...stom);
}
// TODO: when we have SSE, these could be more efficient, by using movd/movq.
@@ -4608,8 +4612,14 @@
SDValue Chain = DAG.getStore(DAG.getEntryNode(), dl, Op.getOperand(0),
StackSlot,
PseudoSourceValue::getFixedStack(SSFI), 0);
+ return BuildFILD(Op, SrcVT, Chain, StackSlot, DAG);
+}
+SDValue X86TargetLowering::BuildFILD(SDValue Op, MVT SrcVT, SDValue Chain,
+ SDValue StackSlot,
+ SelectionDAG &DAG) {
// Build the FILD
+ DebugLoc dl =...