search for: springboards

This is a template that takes care of managing plugin registries. I wrote it because I got the distinct feeling I was needlessly reinventing the wheel as I wrote a collector registry. I haven't converted anything else to use it, though. Still, it's orthogonal and has become stable in my usage, so I thought I'd submit it in advance. To get my collector registry going, all I

...ll B. You can also listen to the recordings, but that's not quite the same. You are invited to join us live any Friday at 12 Noon EST using any SIP client you like or the PSTN if that's your thing. We are also currently working with Polycom on some example apps that you can actually use as springboards to develop your own programs that talke to the Polycom and use its microbrowser to advantage. http://VoipUsersConference.org IRC #voip-users-conference SIP: 7463#22622#${PIN}@proxy.ideassip.com - get a PIN from Talkshoe.com, it takes less than a minute Google Group/Mailing List: http://tr.im/...

Cédric Venet wrote: > I just > didn't and still don't understand how you do it, but this is probably > not the good place to discuses this. > > > What about multiple translation unit then? because from my > understanding, this will generate multiple definition of symbol, so you > will never be able to link it (except with some strange link > specification

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1857 Summary: [RFE] restrict port forwarding to localhost Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.8p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy:

When I started this, I deliberately restricted the question to what should go in the IR. The fact of recording hints in the IR should not be controversial; it can't be better not to have them than to have them. Unfortunately, others used this as a springboard for discussing whether and how the inliner should use those hints. We aren't really ready to have that discussion,

I am setting up printing services on a Suse 10.1 server useing Samba 3.0.22 I can create a printer on an XP client and connect to the Samba printer share. I can the print a test page from XP. The print file gets to the server (see logs below), but nothing prints I can print files from Linux to the printer OK Any suggestions will be appreciated ++++++++++ smb.conf ++++++++++ [global] workgroup

I am setting up printing services on a Suse 10.1 server useing Samba 3.0.22 I can create a printer on an XP client and connect to the Samba printer share. I can the print a test page from XP. The print file gets to the server (see logs below), but nothing prints I can print files from Linux to the printer OK Any suggestions will be appreciated ++++++++++ smb.conf ++++++++++ [global] workgroup

On 12/23/15 2:09 AM, Russell Wallace wrote: > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 10:55 AM, John Criswell <jtcriswel at gmail.com > <mailto:jtcriswel at gmail.com>> wrote: > > You could conservatively assume that any function that has its > address taken has a pointer to it that escapes into memory or > external code. > > > Right, that's what I'm

David Vandevoorde a écrit : > On Aug 27, 2009, at 3:07 AM, Cédric Venet wrote: > > >> David Vandevoorde a écrit : >> >>> I don't think those are _good_ reasons though: If one doesn't want >>> a C+ + function to be inlined, one shouldn't define it inline. >>> >>> >>> >> You must not have written a

Is there any reason to believe that a samba server would be slower when serving up roaming profiles than a real Windows server? I know roaming profiles are slow by nature and that there are things you can do to help like configuring ffolder redirection. But all else being equal, how would a samba server compare to a Windows server when it comes to speed specifically with respect to roaming

Hi everyone, first of all, I searched through the archives for any posts resembling this, I didn't read all posts about the patents so if this has been suggested before I apologise. I read in an article on C|Net (I think, it was linked from Slashdot anyway) that Thompson are threatening to sue you if Ogg Vorbis becomes a success. Which is evil, and I'm also mad at them because they never

This is only my second email to the rsync mailing list. My first was sent under the title "Re: TODO hardlink performance optimizations" on Jan 3, 2004. The response of the rsync developers to that email was remarkable (in my opinion). I felt that the rsync performance enhancements that resulted from the ensuing discussion and code improvements were so consequential that I dared not