search for: springboard

...scription, and use the default constructor. To convert, many registries in the system would need to also define: 1. An custom entry type, particularly where the default constructor was insufficient. 2. A custom traits type. 3. The RegisterFoo template, to create the constructor wrapper springboard. Thanks, Gordon Index: include/llvm/Support/Registry.h =================================================================== --- include/llvm/Support/Registry.h (revision 0) +++ include/llvm/Support/Registry.h (revision 0) @@ -0,0 +1,243 @@ +//=== Registry.h - Linker-supported plugin regi...

...ll B. You can also listen to the recordings, but that's not quite the same. You are invited to join us live any Friday at 12 Noon EST using any SIP client you like or the PSTN if that's your thing. We are also currently working with Polycom on some example apps that you can actually use as springboards to develop your own programs that talke to the Polycom and use its microbrowser to advantage. http://VoipUsersConference.org IRC #voip-users-conference SIP: 7463#22622#${PIN}@proxy.ideassip.com - get a PIN from Talkshoe.com, it takes less than a minute Google Group/Mailing List: http://tr.im...

Cédric Venet wrote: > I just > didn't and still don't understand how you do it, but this is probably > not the good place to discuses this. > > > What about multiple translation unit then? because from my > understanding, this will generate multiple definition of symbol, so you > will never be able to link it (except with some strange link > specification

...o see something like GatewayPort for PermitOpen, restricting clients to just services on the machine with sshd. Currently PermitOpen can only do this if you also specify a certain port. I'd like to allow any port (it is dynamically selected), but prevent people from using the sshd machine as a springboard to other machines. The users will not get a shell, instead ssh is essentially a VPN layer to get access to more insecure network services on the machine. Bug 1513 might be related, although the focus there is on networks instead of ports. My usecase is limited to restricting to localhost. -- Con...

When I started this, I deliberately restricted the question to what should go in the IR. The fact of recording hints in the IR should not be controversial; it can't be better not to have them than to have them. Unfortunately, others used this as a springboard for discussing whether and how the inliner should use those hints. We aren't really ready to have that discussion, because nobody has any data on how well that would work in llvm. (We do have some data on well it worked on other compilers; I have worked on 2 others, and ignoring &quot...

...26:21 +0100] Started filter /usr/lib/cups/filter/pstops (PID 13886) for job 38. I [25/Jul/2006:16:26:21 +0100] Started filter /usr/lib/cups/filter/foomatic-rip (PID 13887) for job 38. I [25/Jul/2006:16:26:21 +0100] Started backend /usr/lib/cups/backend/usb (PID 13888) for job 38. Mark Stobbs Springboard-ASA Ltd Ph: +44 (0) 7917-888-336

...26:21 +0100] Started filter /usr/lib/cups/filter/pstops (PID 13886) for job 38. I [25/Jul/2006:16:26:21 +0100] Started filter /usr/lib/cups/filter/foomatic-rip (PID 13887) for job 38. I [25/Jul/2006:16:26:21 +0100] Started backend /usr/lib/cups/backend/usb (PID 13888) for job 38. Mark Stobbs Springboard-ASA Ltd Ph: +44 (0) 7917-888-336

On 12/23/15 2:09 AM, Russell Wallace wrote: > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 10:55 AM, John Criswell <jtcriswel at gmail.com > <mailto:jtcriswel at gmail.com>> wrote: > > You could conservatively assume that any function that has its > address taken has a pointer to it that escapes into memory or > external code. > > > Right, that's what I'm

David Vandevoorde a écrit : > On Aug 27, 2009, at 3:07 AM, Cédric Venet wrote: > > >> David Vandevoorde a écrit : >> >>> I don't think those are _good_ reasons though: If one doesn't want >>> a C+ + function to be inlined, one shouldn't define it inline. >>> >>> >>> >> You must not have written a

Is there any reason to believe that a samba server would be slower when serving up roaming profiles than a real Windows server? I know roaming profiles are slow by nature and that there are things you can do to help like configuring ffolder redirection. But all else being equal, how would a samba server compare to a Windows server when it comes to speed specifically with respect to roaming

Hi everyone, first of all, I searched through the archives for any posts resembling this, I didn't read all posts about the patents so if this has been suggested before I apologise. I read in an article on C|Net (I think, it was linked from Slashdot anyway) that Thompson are threatening to sue you if Ogg Vorbis becomes a success. Which is evil, and I'm also mad at them because they never

...y access, but rather methods to keep N copies of a filesystem synchronized (in real time) across N number of Linux hosts. (**important distinction**) To help articulate my idea for rsyncfs, I feel it important to describe the two methods taken by PeerFS and Constant Replicator and to use that as a springboard to describe rsyncfs. Both embed themselves into the Linux kernel (as modules), and I assume into/under the VFS, but I am not sure. PeerFS is a peer-to-peer filesystem. It uses its own on-disk filesystem, so one uses PeerFS _instead_ of another filesystem like ext3 or reiser. Constant Replicator s...