search for: spilsbury

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 52 matches for "spilsbury".

2007 Apr 29
5
Wobbly jerkyness
About a month ago, David made a commit to wobbly to the spring engine which has introduced some bugs. They are hard to explain so bear with me. In a sense, the wobbly plugin does not seem as smooth as it used to be and the windows jerk all over the place. For example, I sometimes notice that when I move a large window (around 2/3 of the size of the desktop window), If I moved it down, the top of
2009 Mar 01
3
CompRect modification
Me and Dennis Kasprzyk changed CompRect to be more intuitive and easily replace XRectangle use. This patch changes CompRect and whole Core. Thanks for attention. -- Eduardo Gurgel Pinho (GELSoL-UFC) (Gentoo) Linux User #415930 http://edgurgel.wordpress.com http://alu.dc.ufc.br/~eduardo -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2009 Jun 05
1
[PATCH][0.9] Make bool CompWindow::isFocussable Wrappable
Hi, The attached core patch makes the 'isFocussable' getter in CompWindow wrappable. This way, plugins such as winrules can make core's getter function return a different value to the one stored internally without actually having to modify the value. Kind Regards, Sam -- Sam Spilsbury -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0001-Make-bool-CompWindow-isFocussable-wrappable.patch Type: unknown/unknown Size: 2239 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/compiz/attachments/20090606/975b7ccd/attachment.bin
2007 Apr 29
3
White boarders on size 32 shadows. Intel platform only
Recently, I brought up a topic about white boarders being drawn instead of shadows in Gnome-Window-Decorator. A patch was made up by gandalfn to correct this by making 32 pixel shadows 33 pixels, however the patch was not committed because it was a workaround. This is a huge functional annoyance to us intel users and needs to be cured. There are two soultions I can think of: 1 Get in contact
2010 Mar 24
1
Release plans
...ly bisect to find out what caused it and revert that commit. Congrats everyone for staying on board and once we get 0.9.0 out of the way, we can truly say that 1.3+ years of rather boring work rewriting code is out of the way. Kind Regards, Sam [1] http://git.compiz.org/~smspillaz/dbus -- Sam Spilsbury
2007 May 13
3
Fragment interface on Intel
Hi It seem that the fragment interface on certain plugins exceeds the amount of fragment operations possible on Intel GMA cards. This only occurs with the "water" and "blur" plugins. the plugins activate OK and do not report a missing GL_ARB_fragment_program in the server extensions. Waves appear when I use the water plugin with <Super><Ctrl> but there is no
2009 Jun 15
1
Rotate window
Hello! Is it possible to add window rotation like freewins to compiz, now that DRI2 is done? This way reading emails in bed would be very convenient. :) g
2007 Apr 13
2
White Boarders in AIGLX on non-decorated window types
A patch was submitted to the ML a while ago that cured the problem with white boarders in Gtk-Window-Decorator. Can this patch be commited or be a at least fixed up to work with AIGLX? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/compiz/attachments/20070413/ac87c932/attachment.html
2019 Feb 16
5
Compiz 0.9.14.0 released
Compiz 0.9.14.0 has been officially released today. Major changes in this release include: - Development has switched from Bazaar (back) to Git [1]. - CCSM has been ported to PyGObject, GTK 3 and Python 3. - compizconfig-python has been ported from Pyrex to Cython. - Restored the Color Filter plugin by porting it to the new plugin API. - Added support for loading configuration from multiple
2009 Aug 19
0
compiz Digest, Vol 42, Issue 3
...replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of compiz digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. 8.2 behaving weird on openSuSE 10.3 & 11.0 (David C. Rankin) > 2. Re: 8.2 behaving weird on openSuSE 10.3 & 11.0 (Sam Spilsbury) > 3. Re: 8.2 behaving weird on openSuSE 10.3 & 11.0 (David C. Rankin) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 14:33:14 -0500 > From: "David C. Rankin" <drankinatty at suddenlinkm...
2007 May 27
2
commit a50d2f9e0f66f445338eb5ad7361b48d48446b29 broke compiz for me
Hello, as you can see in the other thread the current git does not work for me. so I did a git bisect and found out that this commit broke it for me: --------------------- git bisect good a50d2f9e0f66f445338eb5ad7361b48d48446b29 is first bad commit commit a50d2f9e0f66f445338eb5ad7361b48d48446b29 Author: David Reveman <davidr at novell.com> Date: Fri May 18 16:05:31 2007 -0400 Remove
2009 Aug 18
1
8.2 behaving weird on openSuSE 10.3 & 11.0
Listmates, I installed 8.2 on opensuse 10.3 from the opensuse XGL repository to replace 7.6. Compiz works with the nvidia 8600 GT card (512M of GDDR3) on the box, but the ctrl+alt <- -> switching behavior is really bad. In 7.6, the ctrl+alt <- -> desktop switching changed desktops crisply with just the slightest hint of the cube detected during the very short and nice switch.
2014 Nov 17
1
"Which version should I use?"
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Sam Spilsbury <smspillaz at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 3:28 AM, Kristian Lyngstøl > <kristian at bohemians.org> wrote: > > So to sum up: Equal stability, fewer features, but actively maintained. > > > > In the end I told the user in question that 0.9.12.0...
2014 Nov 17
0
"Which version should I use?"
...> > [1] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/compiz/2009-February/003284.html > > - Kristian > > _______________________________________________ > compiz mailing list > compiz at lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/compiz > -- Sam Spilsbury
2014 Nov 12
2
"Which version should I use?"
This is a somewhat controversial subject which I only reluctantly bring up. I honestly believe that open discussion is the only way to run a project, and I apologize in advance if I offend anyone. I got what should have been an easy question on #compiz a few days ago. A user came in and asked "What version do you recommend I use?". I honestly didn't know what to say. >From a
2014 Nov 18
1
Previously, on the Compiz Saga.. Pending Response!
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 09:19:41AM +0800, Sam Spilsbury wrote: >> So I was looking forward to starting my day on a positive note until I >> scroll through the commit logs and see this: >> >> http://git.compiz.org/compiz /plugins/ezoom/commit/?id=aec55753c2b99764dbad6cd77832f0725b62ddcd >> >> Is this seriously how we c...
2008 Aug 11
0
Object Framework?
...might be up to some of the other core devs to finish off the O-F branch and see if we can merge it in. According to David's last few mails, the branch is 'almost complete', so I guess if we can figure it out, then it shouldn't be too hard to merge it in. What do you think? -- Sam Spilsbury
2009 Feb 11
1
Advice to plugin developers during 0.9
As 0.9 will contain numerous core-changes which are likely to affect both behavior and plugin development, the recommended way of developing new plugins throughout 0.9 will be to use the released developer versions, NOT master. The exceptions are plugins that are already part of the release and plugins that depend on functionality that only exist in master. This will allow plugin developers to
2009 May 11
1
Compiz licensing
David: I am trying to contact someone regarding Compiz licensing. I got your name by doing a search on "who to contact for compiz licensing" which sent me to a web article: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/compiz/2007-February/001413.html Can you direct me to someone (name, phone number) with whom I can discuss. Thanks and regards, -- Pradeep Jain pjain at
2009 Jun 06
0
[PATCH][0.9] Move modifier handling into a separate top-level class
...fier manipulation and conversion functions are exposed to plugins. It is required by vpswitch for example. The patch has been tested and works fine and shouldn't require an ABI bump because no function in screen.h has been removed, only functions in privatescreen.h Kind Regards, Sam -- Sam Spilsbury -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0001-Move-modifier-handling-into-a-separate-top-level-cla.patch Type: unknown/unknown Size: 22212 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/compiz/attachments/20090606/c6c838c6/attachment...