compiz - Apr 2007 - White Boarders in AIGLX on non-decorated window types

A patch was submitted to the ML a while ago that cured the problem with
white boarders in Gtk-Window-Decorator. Can this patch be commited or be a
at least fixed up to work with AIGLX?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/compiz/attachments/20070413/ac87c932/attachment.html

On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 21:40 +0800, Sam Spilsbury wrote:
> A patch was submitted to the ML a while ago that cured the problem
> with white boarders in Gtk-Window-Decorator. Can this patch be
> commited or be a at least fixed up to work with AIGLX?
What patch is that? In case you're talking about this patch:
http://gandalfn.club.fr/ubuntu/compiz-patch/90-fix-no-border-window-shadow.patch

That patch has not been committed because it's not a fix. It's a
workaround for an issue that no one have been able to track down yet
afaik.

- David

On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 15:45 +0800, Sam Spilsbury wrote:
> How is it a workaround? It fixes the problem...
It's pretty obvious if you look at the code. It avoids creating pixmaps
with certain widths even though that should work perfectly fine.
> 
> On 4/18/07, David Reveman <davidr@novell.com> wrote:
>         On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 21:40 +0800, Sam Spilsbury wrote: 
>         > A patch was submitted to the ML a while ago that cured the
>         problem
>         > with white boarders in Gtk-Window-Decorator. Can this patch
>         be
>         > commited or be a at least fixed up to work with AIGLX?
>         
>         What patch is that? In case you're talking about this patch: 
>        
http://gandalfn.club.fr/ubuntu/compiz-patch/90-fix-no-border-window-shadow.patch
>         
>         That patch has not been committed because it's not a fix.
It's
>         a 
>         workaround for an issue that no one have been able to track
>         down yet
>         afaik.
>         
>         - David
>         
> 
- David