search for: spf1

This caused a crash on a 2.6.10-1.12_FC2smp kernel May 19 09:56:35 spf1 kernel: Assertion failure in log_do_checkpoint() at fs/jbd/checkpoint.c:361: "drop_count != 0 || cleanup_ret != 0" May 19 09:56:35 spf1 kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------ May 19 09:56:37 spf1 kernel: kernel BUG at fs/jbd/checkpoint.c:361! May 19 09:56:37 spf1 kernel: invalid op...

...76 2560 ) 14400 IN A 178.15.51.221 14400 IN MX 10 mail.itadmins.net. 14400 IN NS ns1.itadmins.net. 14400 IN NS ns2.itadmins.net. 14400 IN NS ns3.itadmins.net. 60 IN TXT "v=spf1 a mx -all" any ideas? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlD+XfEACgkQIUUjp07y+ZYZyQCfSZhTm0W0tO+Ps0gol2GJSL7Y wXQAn3w0VawUcwHglKMCu4maGMs5rtQG =qRiU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Your spf record is broken: dovecot.org. 39942 IN TXT "v=spf1 a -all" -- Jim Flowers <jflowers at ezo.net> -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.

I am inquiring about how to setup a proper SPF record. I know there are SPF wizards/generators available but each seem to have a different "opinion" of what should be included and what should not be included. Let me give you a scenario of my setup, and hopefully someone can help me out. My domain is: test.com My mailserver hostname is: mail.host.com which also has a MATCHING PTR

Hello Everyone, I am used to messing with bind zones directly. With samba 4, I cannot do that. Is the following the correct way to add a TXT record for SPF to the zone using samba-tool? /usr/local/samba/bin/samba-tool dns add s4server.example.org example.org example.org TXT "v=spf1 mx -all" I am not sure it is because it is showing up with dig as "v=spf1" "mx" "-all" where it should be all one string, I believe. Thank you for any help, Trever -- "Life is a comedy for those who think and a tragedy for those who feel." -- Unknown...

...1H ; retry 1W ; expire 1H ) ; minimum NS ns1.example.com. MX 10 mail TXT "v=spf1 a mx include:isp.com -all" example.com. A aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd ns1 A aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd mail A aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd The server is setup as with a caching only configuration with recursion turned off. Anyone have any idea what could be wr...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Over the past weekend, I added SPF screening on the MTA at shorewall.net. SPF is a mechanism for a domain to use DNS to publish a list of those IP addresses that are used to send legitimate email from that domain. A receiving MTA can use that published information to determine if email from a domain is being sent through an MTA belonging to that

...> <**0 at yahoo.fr> > (reason: 554 5.7.9 Message not accepted for policy reasons. See http://postmaster.yahoo.com/errors/postmaster-28.html) > > > > For those who have the power to change it: Please do! Reading over it, a simple TXT record for SPF might suffice: v=spf1 +mx ~all My presumption is that Yahoo! spam policy now rates neutral responses as spam and rejects (instead of rating them neutral and delivering to a user's spam/junk mail folder). In my opinion, it's a llittle absurd for Yahoo! to take this approach but I also recognize that times are e...

...(reason: 554 5.7.9 Message not accepted for policy reasons. See http://postmaster.yahoo.com/errors/postmaster-28.html) >> >> >> >> For those who have the power to change it: Please do! > > Reading over it, a simple TXT record for SPF might suffice: > > v=spf1 +mx ~all > > My presumption is that Yahoo! spam policy now rates neutral responses > as spam and rejects (instead of rating them neutral and delivering to > a user's spam/junk mail folder). In my opinion, it's a llittle absurd > for Yahoo! to take this approach but I also r...

...which fails spf and dkim policies] and I don't understand why this IP is evaluated? Second thing which I don't understand is second report which I got from tumieszkamy.pl. SPF record in dns zone of domain kamir-transport.pl was looking like below (now I changed it to slightly different): *v=spf1 mx include:_spf.google.com <http://spf.google.com> -all* Does anybody could help uderstand these things? -- *Pozdrawiam / Best Regards* *Piotr Bracha* -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/2018...

I am investigating whether dovecot(https://github.com/dovecot/core/) handles case insensitive Message-ID headers as per RFC. I can't raise a support issue with cPanel team (https://tickets.cpanel.net/review/login.cgi) as that needs an paid account with them. There may be an issue with the CPANEL/WHM DKIM module. Is the source code online? Rob

Hello, I'm trying to implement domainkeys and dkim on my domain and then to get it set up with postfix. Currently i'm having difficulty with the first stage, adding the domainkey txt record to bind, is a special version of bind required to do this? The machine that handles dns is using bind 9.5.1-p3. Thanks. Dave.

...t;> DiG 9.8.3-P1-RedHat-9.8.3-2.P1.fc15 <<>> axfr @localhost domain.com ; (1 server found) ;; global options: +cmd domain.com. 3600 IN SOA ns1.domain.ru. support.domain.ru. 2011030700 10800 3600 604800 86400 domain.com. 3600 IN TXT "v=spf1 ip4:46.30.40.29 a mx ~all" domain.com. 3600 IN NS ns1.domain.ru. domain.com. 3600 IN NS ns2.domain.ru. domain.com. 3600 IN NS ns3.domain.ru. domain.com. 3600 IN NS ns4.domain.ru. domain.com....

On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 05:07:04PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:06:58AM +0200, Ady wrote: > > > On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 12:21:32PM -0800, Patrick Masotta wrote: > > > > [ ... Failed to build gnu-efi. ... ] > > > > For some reason I have not received the original email from Patrick > > Masotta in my inbox, so I am using the

...; expire (4 weeks) 604800 ; minimum (1 week) ) NS ns.DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD. @ IN A 192.168.1.252 @ IN MX 10 DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD. @ IN TXT "v=spf1 mx a -all" #================END========================= my smb.conf looks like #================START======================= [global] netbios name = DOMAIN2 realm = AD.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, ldap, cldap, kdc, drepl, winbindd, nt...

...not accepted for policy reasons. See http://postmaster.yahoo.com/errors/postmaster-28.html) >>> >>> >>> >>> For those who have the power to change it: Please do! >> >> Reading over it, a simple TXT record for SPF might suffice: >> >> v=spf1 +mx ~all >> >> My presumption is that Yahoo! spam policy now rates neutral responses >> as spam and rejects (instead of rating them neutral and delivering to >> a user's spam/junk mail folder). In my opinion, it's a llittle absurd >> for Yahoo! to take this ap...

...3600 ) ; Negative Cache TTL ; Name servers patrikx3.com. 300 IN NS ns1.patrikx3.com . patrikx3.com. 300 IN MX 10 mail.patrikx3.com. patrikx3.com. 300 IN TXT "v=spf1 a: mail.patrikx3.com -all" patrikx3.com. 300 IN CAA 0 issue " letsencrypt.org" mail._domainkey.patrikx3.com. 300 IN TXT ( "v=DKIM1; h=sha256; k=rsa; " "p=secure" "secure" ) ; ----- DKIM key mail f...

...604800 ; minimum (1 week) >> ) >> NS ns.DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD. >> @ IN A 192.168.1.252 >> @ IN MX 10 DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD. >> @ IN TXT "v=spf1 mx a -all" >> #================END========================= >> >> my smb.conf looks like >> #================START======================= >> [global] >> netbios name = DOMAIN2 >> realm = AD.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD >> server...

...>>> ) >>>> NS ns.DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD. >>>> @ IN A 192.168.1.252 >>>> @ IN MX 10 DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD. >>>> @ IN TXT "v=spf1 mx a -all" >>>> #================END========================= >>>> >>>> my smb.conf looks like >>>> #================START======================= >>>> [global] >>>> netbios name = DOMAIN2 >>>>...

...) >> NS ns.DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD. >> @ IN A 192.168.1.252 >> @ IN MX 10 DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD. >> @ IN TXT "v=spf1 mx a -all" >> #================END========================= >> >> my smb.conf looks like >> #================START======================= >> [global] >> netbios name = D...