Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "speexiness".
Did you mean:
sleepiness
2006 Aug 27
1
AMD64 bug (was Re: [theora-dev] AMD64 bug (fwd))
jean-marc, speexies,
know if this bug is fixed in speex svn?
kfish.
----- Forwarded message from Tristan Wibberley <maihem@maihem.org> -----
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 18:49:17 +0100
From: Tristan Wibberley <maihem@maihem.org>
To: Conrad Parker <conrad@metadecks.org>
CC: theora-dev@xiph.org
Subject: Re: [theora-dev] AMD64 bug
Conrad Parker wrote:
>applied, thanks.
>
2004 Aug 06
0
Re: Please confirm your message
speex-dev@xiph.org wrote:
>Hello, this is the mailing list anti-spam filter at Xiph.Org.
>We need you to confirm your e-mail message with the subject of
>"realtime encoding".
>
>Please send a message to the following address, or simply use your
>mailer's "Reply" feature.
>
> speex-dev+confirm+1052924039.22499.5a39af@xiph.org
>
>Rather
2009 Nov 23
1
ffmpeg2theora 0.25 : This doesn't look like a Speex file
why is this happening?
$ ffmpeg2theora /dev/video0 -f video4linux2 --inputfps 15 -o - |
oggfwd myhost 8000 mypass /test.ogv
[video4linux2 @ 0x196b8c0][3]Capabilities: 4000001
[video4linux2 @ 0x196b8c0]The V4L2 driver changed the video from
384x288 to 320x240
oggfwd: Connected to server
Input #0, video4linux2, from '/dev/video0':
Duration: N/A, start: 1258938983.307552, bitrate:
2004 Aug 06
5
reommended settings for low bitrate voicecom codec ?
Hello,
the voice-communication TeamSpeak (www.teamspeak.org) is currently testing a
version that supports speex codecs. The quality for high bitrates is quite
good.
BUT, the low-bandwidth speex codecs that are currently used arent very good.
What I did to find this out:
I comprared a speex AVB with 6.3 KBit/sec (total, overhead for packets and
stuff included) and the 6.3 Kbit/sec Celp Codec