search for: specializer

Hi all, I'm attempting to use LLVM for run-time code specialization, but I'm facing a performance hurdle. I'm currently performing the specialization during the AST to LLVM IR translation, but unfortunately this leads to relatively slow recompiles as LLVM has to perform all the heavy (optimization) passes over and over again. So I was hoping that by first creating unspecialized LLVM

From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com> This patch handle additional cases for IVRS bugs where special->handle is not correctly initialized for IOAPIC and HPETS due to firmware bugs. Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com> Provide logic in "is_ioapic_overidden()" Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> ---

I don't think there is any infrastructure for this kind of specialization. The closest thing I can think of is the profile-guided optimization stuff that Andreas Neufstifter has worked on. Because compilation and optimization with LLVM is expensive, our approach with Unladen Swallow has been to try to wait longer to generate specialized code, so we don't have to recompile. If memory

Hi Guys, this is actually a thread of emails, but for some reason, even though i am a member, it's withholding my email so i said i would try it this route instead!... I appreciate the reading Thank you. If i have: matrix: > var1 var2 var3 > cell1 x x x > cell2 x x x > cell3 x x x > > cell4 > > . > .

> Anyway, Wiki is operational, but Dear List: Please report surprises. 1_ At the bottom-center, of each wiki page, there used to be a: "This page has been accessed 'N' times." message, in which 'N' was a number that (I think) comes from setting: $wgDisableCounters = true; Additionally, there used to be a "Special:PopularPages" page, available as an

Hi Chris, Thanks for pointing me to that presentation! It helped me come up with a strategy that I believe might work: 1) Use CloneFunction() to make a copy of the original unspecialized (but optimized) function. 2) Specialize it using a custom function pass which identifies the specialization parameters and substitutes them with given run-time constants. 3) Run the function through a

Hi, Great to see Thunderbird support SPECIAL-USE now. I would like to hear the list about the intended use of SPECIAL-USE. I get the impression from several earlier mails here that the intention is for the server to globally decide what the folder-name of a specific SPECIAL-USE folder is for all users. That's the way the documentation exemplifies it and what I get from posts like this:

I've waited about two years to write this mail... :) As of Dezember, 24th Mozilla Thunderbird can handle SPECIAL-USE. The patch, which adds the required functionality, has passed review and TBs nightly build was successful. The next official Thunderbird release (version 38, release date 2015-05-19) will very likely ship SPECIAL-USE included. \o/ SPECIAL USE is an IMAP extension. It means

On May 27, 2010, at 6:08 AM, Nicolas Capens wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm attempting to use LLVM for run-time code specialization, but I'm facing a performance hurdle. I'm currently performing the specialization during the AST to LLVM IR translation, but unfortunately this leads to relatively slow recompiles as LLVM has to perform all the heavy (optimization) passes over and

Full_Name: simon wood Version: 2.2.0 (and lower) OS: linux/windows Submission from: (NULL) (86.135.153.59) I think that the documentation for the `specials' attribute of a `terms.object' is not quite right: specials: If the 'specials' argument was given to 'terms.formula' there is a 'specials' attribute, a list of vectors indicating the terms

I'd like to configure my dovecot service to use the IMAP SPECIAL-USE extension, but have a few questions for those who have used them, or are knowledgable about its use. Using this configuration as an example, namespace { ... mailbox xxx { special_use = \Sent } } Q1) Am I correct that mail client that don't understand SPECIAL-USE extentions will behave the same way with

Hi, I have a scenario where a doctor can have one or more specialties. For each doctor, one and only one of her specialties can be designated as primary. So I have tables called doctors, specialties, and doctors_specialties, the last of which has a boolean is_primary column. The doctor model class specifies that: has_and_belongs_to_many :specialties I want to enforce, at the lowest possible

On 2014-12-29 20:45, Stephan Bosch wrote: > For creating a special use mailbox there is the CREATE-SPECIAL-USE > capability (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6154, Section 3). As you > suggested, the special use attributes can also be changed using the > METADATA capability (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6154, Section 4). > Unfortunately, both of these features are not yet supported

Hello, I have problems with people having different groups who access a shared directory via samba. The requirements are: 1. There are people with group "group1" and group "group2" in /etc/passwd 2. 3 people from group "group1" and 2 people from group "group2" are allowed to access a shared directory and have read/write access to that directory. Our

Hi all, I've locally got Dovecot 2.2.21 (5345f22) installed on my MacBook (via homebrew) that I've been using to test my IMAP library against. What is interesting is that even though Dovecot does not advertise CREATE-SPECIAL-USE, it supports creation of special-use folders via the "CREATE FolderName (USE (\Whatever))" syntax. According to rfc6154, a server is supposed to

It's implemented now in dovecot-2.1 hg. It also deprecates autocreate plugin (but it still works the old way). The idea is that you can now do e.g.: mailbox Trash { auto = no special_use = \Trash } mailbox Drafts { auto = no special_use = \Drafts } mailbox Sent { auto = subscribe # autocreate, autosubscribe special_use = \Sent } mailbox Spam { auto = create # autocreate, but

Hey, I'm currently using the GotoIf application to set it so if certain caller ID's call my number, it will transfer it to my cell phone, here is the code I have so far. I get an error message that states "call rejected by 198.22.67.70: No such context/extention." when I call the number from my house number. Anyway, here is the code I have. [inbound] exten =>

Hello can anyone help please? i read two words "cell1", "cell2" into a list. I want to turn this list into a factor. > cell_data <-list(c('cell1','cell2')) > cell_data [[1]] [1] "cell1" "cell2" > factor_list <- factor(cell_data) Error in sort.list(y) : 'x' must be atomic for 'sort.list' Have you called

thanks for the feedback! Userdb would be an option, however we would need to extend our LDAP Schema with an additional "autocreate flag". Modifying the LDAP import scripts, this is quite a task. Another option we were thinking of is creating the special folders by a script right after user creation. By far the best and easiest solution would be a flag to auto-create the special folders

Thanks Aki!! The welcome plugin sounds like the best workaround. To implement this we would need to upgrade our Dovecot installation: dovecot-core: Installed: 1:2.2.24-1~bpo8+1 Candidate: 1:2.2.27-2~bpo8+1 Are there special recommendations for the upgrade process (in addition to the Dovecot NEWS file)? Any special steps we should be aware of during the upgrade? Is it that simple