search for: spec'ing

Hi folks How would you spec something like this: as_user username do FileUtils.chmod_R 0755, "#{directory}/*" end Where as_user fires off a new process (and set uid to username). It seems that this won''t catch FileUtils.chmod_R: FileUtils.should_receive(:chmod_R).with(0755, "#{@domain...

...ers into it, exports the buffer as dma-buf > > (DRM_IOCTL_PRIME_HANDLE_TO_FD), passes this to the wayland server > > (again including meta data of course). > > > > Is that correct? > > Both are correct descriptions of typical behaviors. But it isn't spec'ed > anywhere who has to do the buffer allocation. Well, according to Pekka's reply it is spec'ed that way, for the existing buffer types. So for server allocated buffers you need (a) a wayland protocol extension and (b) support for the extension in the clients. > That's to...

...ers into it, exports the buffer as dma-buf > > (DRM_IOCTL_PRIME_HANDLE_TO_FD), passes this to the wayland server > > (again including meta data of course). > > > > Is that correct? > > Both are correct descriptions of typical behaviors. But it isn't spec'ed > anywhere who has to do the buffer allocation. Well, according to Pekka's reply it is spec'ed that way, for the existing buffer types. So for server allocated buffers you need (a) a wayland protocol extension and (b) support for the extension in the clients. > That's to...

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 5:57 PM, Jayme <jaymef at gmail.com> wrote: > I'm spec'ing a new oVirt build using three Dell R720's w/ 256GB. I'm > considering storage options. I don't have a requirement for high amounts > of storage, I have a little over 1TB to store but want some overhead so I'm > thinking 2TB of usable space would be sufficient. &gt...

...ple taht is protected by ip restrictions via a proxy in front of it. I've configured a tika server behind an apache proxy which enforces basic auth, but sending basic auth credentials for a tika server is not currently supported by Dovecot. The following patch allows to have user and password specified in the fts_tika url in much the same way you can for fts_solr. fts_tika = https://user:password at tika_host/tika John --- dovecot-2.3.11.3-orig/src/plugins/fts/fts-parser-tika.c???? 2020-08-12 14:20:41.000000000 +0200 +++ dovecot-2.3.11.3/src/plugins/fts/fts-parser-tika.c? 2020-11-15 15:18...

Hi, I am planning to deploy an Asterisk system to supply 4-6,000 students with voicemail capabilities. The system will be set up with non-DIDs, route incoming calls to voicemail, then send an email notification. Anyone with some ideas on how I should go about spec'ing the server this use? - Eve Ellen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20080318/53b2ea1f/attachment.htm

...g correctly-formed headers (but would would bomb or give garbled poetry as it reads past the short end-of-packet). Of course, to add 8-bit clean data, one has to muck with vc.user_comments directly, since no easy way to add an 8-bit-clean comment is provided by the current API. Anyway, either the spec or the code has to change. I hope it's the code, so I can make my totally unworthy t-shirt claim. And yah, I realize the comment tools don't handle the spec'ed 8-bit cleanliness yet either. Erik. --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http...

...the buffer as dma-buf >>> (DRM_IOCTL_PRIME_HANDLE_TO_FD), passes this to the wayland server >>> (again including meta data of course). >>> >>> Is that correct? >> >> Both are correct descriptions of typical behaviors. But it isn't spec'ed >> anywhere who has to do the buffer allocation. > > Well, according to Pekka's reply it is spec'ed that way, for the > existing buffer types. So for server allocated buffers you need > (a) a wayland protocol extension and (b) support for the extension > in the...

One difference I notice is that in your failing example you are invoking /usr/bin/ld directly to link: /usr/bin/ld -o ssh ssh.o readconf.o clientloop.o sshtty.o sshconnect.o sshconnect2.o mux.o -L. -Lopenbsd-compat/ -Wl,-z,retpolineplt -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now -Wl,-z,noexecstack -fstack-protector-strong -pie -lssh -lopenbsd-compat -lutil -lz -lcrypt -lresolv whereas my example is

...everything starts slowing > down, then it would be time to add a separate fileserver. > Stop me if I am wrong, but didn't a certain company produce something > called an SBS ?? Yeah you're right. The main thing to do I think is set expectations appropriately. e.g. for a so-and-so spec'ed machine, you can expect x authentications per/second and y IO operations per second simultaneously. Problem is, I have no idea what x and y are :-).

Hi, > > Hmm? I'm assuming the wayland client (in the guest) talks to the > > wayland proxy, using the wayland protocol, like it would talk to a > > wayland display server. Buffers must be passed from client to > > server/proxy somehow, probably using fd passing, so where is the > > problem? > > > > Or did I misunderstand the role of the proxy? >

Hi, > > Hmm? I'm assuming the wayland client (in the guest) talks to the > > wayland proxy, using the wayland protocol, like it would talk to a > > wayland display server. Buffers must be passed from client to > > server/proxy somehow, probably using fd passing, so where is the > > problem? > > > > Or did I misunderstand the role of the proxy? >

On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 02:47:24PM +0100, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Sat, 26 May 2018 09:21:01 -0400 > Marco Shmerykowsky via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > In lieu of virtualization, I wouldn't be opposed to some > > small, inexpensive appliance type device (sort of like > > the Netgate firewalls that run pfsense). > >

On 8 June 2018 at 10:52, PGNet Dev <pgnet.dev at gmail.com> wrote: [...] > So, there's a problem for OpenSSH build with spec'ing LD=/usr/bin/ld ? in this particular case, apparently yes. not generally, though. [...] > What's *intended* re: openssh? Support for LD=ld or only =gcc, or undef'd ? Well the intent is you should be able to set CC and LD to whatever you want as long as they work. In this cas...

...ies along with Clang. I've CC'ed llvmdev on this for compiler-rt developers' input. The key issues I see when locating runtime libraries are the following: - These libraries should be shipped with Clang, not installed separately on the system. - They are likely to be somewhat tied to specific versions of Clang/LLVM. - To support cross-compiling, we should be able to install multiple copies of these libraries in a single Clang installation, and use the appropriate one when targeting a particular platform. - The above cross-compiling concern extends to ABI compatibility -- many of the...

...n't pass auth creds in dovecot" bit. > thx! for the patch; hopefully the premise/patch will get picked up. > (ya-request for a proper @dovecot public bug/issue queue!) > > have you found any other 'magic required' to get solr & tika indexing > text/attachments, respectively, in Dovecot context? > is it as straightforward as spec'ing the 'fts_solr' & 'fts_tika' urls, > and Dovecot does the passing-around correctly? I've just started using tika myself, but from my tests, it's as simple as adding fts_tika to a working solr int...

I've got a i7 with 12 logical cores and 16GB of RAM I successfully built RELEASE_390/final but for the last 100 or so files I'd to use "ninja -j2" so as not to keep from swapping in the best case and and in the worst case the build kills itself without completing because apparently its run out of memory. For the first 3200 files or so it was doing just fine with

...;ve said, we process 600 million messages a > month, on primary SSDs in a VMWare cluster, with mechanical storage for > older, archived user mail.? Archived, may not be exactly correct, but > the context should be clear. > One thing to note, which I'm aware of because I was recently spec'ing out a Dell server: Dell, at least, offers two kinds of SSDs, one for heavy write, I think it was, and one for equal r/w. You might dig into that. >> >> But mdadm does, the impact is severe.? I know there are ppl saying >> otherwise, but I?ve seen the impact myself, and I d...

...t gotten to the "can't pass auth creds in dovecot" bit. thx! for the patch; hopefully the premise/patch will get picked up. (ya-request for a proper @dovecot public bug/issue queue!) have you found any other 'magic required' to get solr & tika indexing text/attachments, respectively, in Dovecot context? is it as straightforward as spec'ing the 'fts_solr' & 'fts_tika' urls, and Dovecot does the passing-around correctly?

...lowing down, then it would be time to add a > > separate fileserver. Stop me if I am wrong, but didn't a certain > > company produce something called an SBS ?? > > Yeah you're right. The main thing to do I think is set expectations > appropriately. e.g. for a so-and-so spec'ed machine, you can expect > x authentications per/second and y IO operations per second > simultaneously. > > Problem is, I have no idea what x and y are :-). No and nobody else does and we never will do, if we keep saying 'do not use a DC as a fileserver'. Rowland