search for: sparcs

Hi, I am trying to compile R-2.2.1 on Solaris 2.9 with a 64-bit build. Following the instructions in "R Installation and Adminstration", I changed the following settings in "config.site": CC="gcc -m64" F77="g77 -64" CXX="g++ -m64" LDFLAGS="-L/usr/local/lib/sparcv9 -L/usr/local/lib" But I got the following error messages:

On 2008-09-29 07:46, Keun Soo Yim wrote: > Does anyone succeed at compiling Linux kernel for Sparc v8 architecture? > I am currently trying to expand the regime of LLVM to Sparc kernel codes. > The following is the initial error messages. Any comment is welcomed. > > #1. Inline Assembly > > > > Code: > > register struct thread_info

Hello, The current version in SVN fails to compile in sparc machines since gcc defines "sparc" as a macro in sparc machines that expands to 1 (see below) but Triple.h defines "sparc" as a enum constant. $ cpp -dM /dev/null | grep sparc #define sparc 1 #define __sparc__ 1 #define __sparc 1 The attached patch fixes this problem by renaming sparc to sparc_. Thanks,

Hi Gonglei, [auto build test ERROR on cryptodev/master] [also build test ERROR on v4.9-rc7 next-20161202] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Gonglei/crypto-add-virtio-crypto-driver/20161202-190424 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/herbert/cryptodev-2.6.git master

Hi Gonglei, [auto build test ERROR on cryptodev/master] [also build test ERROR on v4.9-rc7 next-20161202] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Gonglei/crypto-add-virtio-crypto-driver/20161202-190424 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/herbert/cryptodev-2.6.git master

Author: frits Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 529c2fc3f91f97cb1fe208e014d01a6f72ac8ae0 Log message: 6352154 warlock all is not clean 6352865 reduce messages from USB drivers in /var/adm/messages Files: update: usr/src/uts/common/io/scsi/targets/sd.c update: usr/src/uts/common/io/usb/clients/audio/usb_ac/usb_ac.c update: usr/src/uts/common/io/usb/clients/audio/usb_ac/usb_ac_dacf.c

I am trying to do some research that involves instrumenting LLVM IR, that I need to test for performance and scalability on a bunch of systems. I've started trying by trying to get sparc-sun-solaris2.10 (niagara) working. It appears that neither llvm nor llvm-gcc will build natively on the system, so I think that I need to build an llvm-gcc cross compiler. The documentation for building

On Sep 28, 2008, at 9:46 PM, Keun Soo Yim wrote: > > Does anyone succeed at compiling Linux kernel for Sparc v8 > architecture? > I am currently trying to expand the regime of LLVM to Sparc kernel > codes. > The following is the initial error messages. Any comment is welcomed. > > #1. Inline Assembly The Sparc backend has no active maintainer [1]. This

Does anyone succeed at compiling Linux kernel for Sparc v8 architecture? I am currently trying to expand the regime of LLVM to Sparc kernel codes. The following is the initial error messages. Any comment is welcomed. #1. Inline Assembly Code: register struct thread_info *current_thread_info_reg asm("g6"); Error Message: include/asm/thread_info.h:77: error:

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Red Hat, Inc. Security Advisory Synopsis: Security problems in bind Advisory ID: RHSA-1999:054-01 Issue date: 1999-11-11 Updated on: 1999-11-11 Keywords: bind named NXT solinger fdmax Cross references: http://www.isc.org/products/BIND/bind-security-19991108.html

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Red Hat, Inc. Security Advisory Synopsis: Updated mailx and perl packages are now available. Advisory ID: RHSA-2000:048-06 Issue date: 2000-08-07 Updated on: 2000-08-09 Product: Red Hat Linux Keywords: perl suidperl mailx rpm Cross references: RHSA-2000:051

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ______________________________________________________________________________ Caldera Systems, Inc. Security Advisory Subject: local ROOT exploit in BRU Advisory number: CSSA-2000-018.0 Issue date: 2000 June, 14 Cross reference: ______________________________________________________________________________ 1. Problem Description

new klibc sparc build failure against gcc 4.2 ----- Forwarded message from Kilian Krause <kilian at debian.org> ----- Subject: Bug#440721: FTBFS on sparc while linking usr/klibc/libc.so From: Kilian Krause <kilian at debian.org> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit at bugs.debian.org> Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2007 23:35:23 +0200 Package: klibc Version: 1.5.6-2 Severity: serious

Hi Venkatraman, > The current version in SVN fails to compile in sparc machines since > gcc defines "sparc" as a macro in sparc machines that expands to 1 > (see below) but Triple.h defines "sparc" as a enum constant. > > $ cpp -dM /dev/null | grep sparc > #define sparc 1 > #define __sparc__ 1 > #define __sparc 1 > > The attached patch

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Red Hat, Inc. Security Advisory Synopsis: New Linux kernel fixes security bug Advisory ID: RHSA-2000:037-01 Issue date: 2000-06-20 Updated on: 2000-06-20 Product: Red Hat Linux Keywords: capabilities setuid suid agpgart 810 aacraid 3x90x MegaRAID Acenic Cross

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Red Hat, Inc. Security Advisory Synopsis: New Linux kernel fixes security bug Advisory ID: RHSA-2000:037-01 Issue date: 2000-06-20 Updated on: 2000-06-20 Product: Red Hat Linux Keywords: capabilities setuid suid agpgart 810 aacraid 3x90x MegaRAID Acenic Cross

..., > FYI, I completely agree that we shouldn't remove the sparc target. However, it is currently unmaintained, and has some pretty glaring bugs. Is anyone interested in stepping up to maintain the target? > > -Chris We can not let it die and I volunteer to keep the Sparc alive! My SPARCstation pizzaboxes can be ready for action in a day or two. Pawel Wodnicki > On Oct 25, 2011, at 6:35 AM, Vikram Adve wrote: >> Sparc is a popular target for architecture simulators, and removing that back end would force people using such simulators to use some other compiler infrastructu...

I don't think the root cause of those warnings are introduced by virtio-crypto driver. What's your opinion? Sam and David? Thanks, -Gonglei > -----Original Message----- > From: kbuild test robot [mailto:lkp at intel.com] > Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2016 10:40 AM > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] crypto: add virtio-crypto driver > > Hi Gonglei, > > [auto build

Hello there, I'd like to have iso image version for ultra sparc 64bit. Recently, I downloaded centos version 4.2 beta iso image and installed on SunUltra sparc 64 bit machine. It was hang when it went to the screen " the CentOS 4.2 beta screen, <Tab>/<Alt tab> | <Space> selects | <F12> next screen ". Any idea? Please help. Thanks in advance. Amy on your

So I decided to dump Samba 2.2.0 on Solaris 8 due to the problems I had getting it to connect to Vista, so I installed Samba 3.4.2 as downloaded from Sunfreeware.com, with prereqs; krb5-1.7-sol8-sparc-local openssl-1.0.0-sol8-sparc-local libgcc-3.4.6-sol8-sparc-local popt-1.14-sol8-sparc-local libiconv-1.13.1-sol8-sparc-local readline-5.2-sol8-sparc-local