search for: spammy

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.3.13 Severity: normal Tags: patch mavisd-new uses SPAMMY since 2.4.1: http://www.mail-archive.com/amavis-user at lists.sourceforge.net/msg05055.html patch attached. -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.1 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux...

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > # fixed in 82f86001 > tags 624197 + pending Bug #624197 [logcheck-database] logcheck-database: update for amavisd-new SPAMMY log entries Added tag(s) pending. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 624197: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=624197 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems

when running asterisk -r, is there a way to turn off the messages? I didn't find the answer in the man page. thanks, Thufir

Hi thanks for the link. Read that page before but somehow missed the comment about ssl+lmtp proxy :-) Are there any plans to implement that to dovecot in future? Regards tobi Am 23.11.2017 um 18:38 schrieb Carsten Rosenberg: > NOTE: LMTP/doveadm proxying doesn't support SSL/TLS currently - any ssl/starttls extra field is ignored > >

NOTE: LMTP/doveadm proxying doesn't support SSL/TLS currently - any ssl/starttls extra field is ignored https://wiki2.dovecot.org/PasswordDatabase/ExtraFields/Proxy Am 23. November 2017 09:31:41 MEZ schrieb Tobi <tobisworld at gmail.com>: >Hi > >I got dovecot 2.2.26 on a Centos7 with latest updates. Dovecot is >configured to act as director and delivers to my two backend

How do folks feel about getting Puppet job listings on this list? I''ve rejected a few that we quite spammy, but when the subject matter really is a system admin with puppet experience, the decision becomes a bit different. I''m looking for general feelings. A simple +1 or -1 would be great. Mike -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users...

Hi! I am using Postfix 2.3.8 and Dovecot 1.0.rc15. Virtual Domains and Mailboxes are configured. I tried to copy spammy Mail with Procmail, but Procmail only sees local mails. How to configure it to get a copy of spammy mails in a mbox or mail-dir?

I have no problems with Gmail from Digital Ocean. But I have both spf, DKIM, DMARC and a reverse pointer. You need to not look spammy. One advantage to using a VPS is your IP is unique. That is you don't share it with a spammer. Not so with hosted services. ? Original Message ? From: M.Roos at f1-outsourcing.eu Sent: October 26, 2020 1:06 AM To: dovecot at dovecot.org; sebastian at sebbe.eu Subject: RE: SV: Lookin...

hi, We have, like in the years past, a table at Fosdem and I'd like to get some tshirts printed to hand out. In the past, the Linux Ninja's and Beards ones got quite a bit of attention ( and both were not brand spammy, which is always nice ). Reaching out to the mailing list for ideas on what we can do this year, with the caveat that I need to finalise by this weekend if we are to get anything in by Fosdem. thanks in advance, -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh Gnu...

Users kept complaining about those messages and it's a little spammy on prime systems so turn it into a debug print. Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas at google.com> Cc: Lukas Wunner <lukas at wunner.de> Cc: linux-pci at vger.kernel.org Cc: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Fixes: b516ea586d71 ("PCI: Enable NVIDIA HDA controllers") Signed-off-by: Kar...

And which email clients can do this? A defacto standard needs to be adopted. If I don't provide SPF or DKIM, I am likely to be deemed spammy, hence a defacto standard has been established. I don't see this with TOTP. I'm all for TOTP, but I'm not going to code my own. ? Original Message ? From: sebastian at sebbe.eu Sent: October 27, 2020 5:56 PM To: dovecot at dovecot.org Reply-to: dovecot at dovecot.org Subject...

...is a run of smbstatus where it coredumps, and afterwards, a gdb session. root@grads:/depot/samba-2.0.6/bin 174# ./smbstatus Samba version 2.0.6 Service uid gid pid machine ---------------------------------------------- <connected users; the info is correct, removing because spammy> Locked files: Pid DenyMode R/W Oplock Name -------------------------------------------------- 19059 DENY_ALL RDWR EXCLUSIVE+BATCH /home/hpdrc-people-6/petrovm/Netscape/Users/default/mail/Inbox.snm Tue Jan 11 10:40:04 2000 Segmentation fault (core dumped) Here...

Hi. I have a fileserver running samba 2.2.7 and netatalk 1.5.5 for old mac clients. Because the mac's are quite spammy with creating .AppleDouble and other system directories, I've added the following to smb.conf: veto files = /.AppleDesktop/.AppleDouble/Network Trash Folder/TheFindByC ontentFolder/TheVolumeSettingsFolder/System Volume Information/Recycled/ Now, when a windows client tries to delete a folder...

...s to be coming from R/src/modules/internet Is this something transient for development purposes, or is it intended to remain in the code? If the latter, is there some way to turn it off (outside of sinking output)? If one has code which is accessing many url connections, the screen can get quite spammy. Thanks -Jeff

From the "Shameless-self-promotion" department :-). Here is an interview Cat Allman did with me about the Samba project : https://developers.google.com/live/shows/6737128306245632 It's too basic for these lists, but I thought you might find it interesting (or at least not too spammy :-). Feel free to forward to anyone who might be interested in Samba but not currently working with us ! Cheers, Jeremy.

Hi guys, sorry the "spam", but I''ve just seen that there is a very good offer for us (ie. months of newrelic, sendgrid, heroku, linode and other cool services). You can check more here: http://tinyurl.com/35adxnv Hope that''s useful for someone (I''ve just took it) -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are

Hi! In the process of making mysystem work again, having just done a reinstall of 6.3 x86_64. I have a considerable collection of procmail recipes for filtering mail in various ways, and since the upgrade none of 'em is working. procmail passes every mail thru spambayes, which gives back a rating on spamminess. this happens, so it's not as if procmail is simply punting. that is

On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 03:31:22PM +0100, Karol Herbst wrote: > Users kept complaining about those messages and it's a little spammy on > prime systems so turn it into a debug print. What is a "prime system"? I'm a little surprised that users would really care about the message. But I do see comments like these: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1836308/comments/15 https://bugs.launchpad.net...

Hi, I''ve discovered that some btrfs code doesn''t check whether kmalloc() call succeeded. I poorly understand what this code does and how it can be changed, maybe it would be happy with __GFP_NOFAIL. Also there are BUG_ON() after kmalloc()''s, if they could be changed not to panic it would be great. --- ./fs/btrfs/compression.c 2010-07-06 16:45:48.000000000 +0400 +++

...ct the instrumentation overhead in our measurements) Bottom line: for our use cases, inlining does all the work, but we're not opposed to having more passes, which might be beneficial for non-game workloads (which is most code). - Warnings We identified 3 classes of issues which manifest as spammy warnings when applying profile data with IRPGO (these affect FEPGO also I believe, but we looked in depth at IRPGO): 1. The main concerning one is that getPGOFuncName mangles the filename into the counter name. This causes us to get instrprof_error::unknown_function when the pgo-use build is done...