search for: spammails

Displaying 15 results from an estimated 15 matches for "spammails".

Did you mean: spammail
2007 Dec 06
1
How to copy Spammail for learning out of Postfix and Dovecot (vmail)
Hi! I am using Postfix 2.3.8 and Dovecot 1.0.rc15. Virtual Domains and Mailboxes are configured. I tried to copy spammy Mail with Procmail, but Procmail only sees local mails. How to configure it to get a copy of spammy mails in a mbox or mail-dir?
2018 Jan 24
3
problem with lda
Hello, I am currently testing the upgrade from our dovecot v2.2.23 to 2.3.0. I have a strange problem with lda. We use bounce mails for internal users if they try to send virus/spammails. The exact same config works with 2.2.23, but not with 2.3.0. The relevant postfix/master.cf part: dovecot unix - n n - - pipe flags=DRhu user=vmail:vmail argv=/opt/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/deliver -d ${recipient} -f ${sender} On the same machine, with 2.2.23 I g...
2018 Jan 25
3
Aw: Re: problem with lda
...etreff: Re: problem with lda > > Op 1/24/2018 om 5:30 PM schreef Infoomatic: > > Hello, > > > > I am currently testing the upgrade from our dovecot v2.2.23 to 2.3.0. I have a strange problem with lda. > > We use bounce mails for internal users if they try to send virus/spammails. The exact same config works with 2.2.23, but not with 2.3.0. > > > > The relevant postfix/master.cf part: > > dovecot unix - n n - - pipe > > flags=DRhu user=vmail:vmail argv=/opt/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/deliver -d ${recipient} -f ${sender...
2015 Mar 20
4
Access to shares is denied after upgrading from 3.6.3 (openSUSE 12.1) to 4.1.17 (openSUSE 13.2)
Hi Marc, Am 19.03.2015 um 22:53 schrieb Marc Muehlfeld: > Am 19.03.2015 um 14:35 schrieb Nissl Reinhard: >> When I try to access share \\platon\root<file:///\\platon\root> as fee\administrator I get the following: >> >> platon:~ # smbclient -c dir -W fee -U administrator%secret //platon/root >> Domain=[FEE] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba
2015 Mar 20
0
Access to shares is denied after upgrading from 3.6.3 (openSUSE 12.1) to 4.1.17 (openSUSE 13.2)
On 20/03/15 06:11, Reinhard Ni?l wrote: > Hi Marc, > > Am 19.03.2015 um 22:53 schrieb Marc Muehlfeld: > >> Am 19.03.2015 um 14:35 schrieb Nissl Reinhard: >>> When I try to access share \\platon\root<file:///\\platon\root> as >>> fee\administrator I get the following: >>> >>> platon:~ # smbclient -c dir -W fee -U administrator%secret
2015 Mar 20
0
Access to shares is denied after upgrading from 3.6.3 (openSUSE 12.1) to 4.1.17 (openSUSE 13.2)
can you try this also copy past it, but set the admin pass fist. then whats the output. SAMBA_NT_ADMIN_PASS="PUT_YOUR-ADMINISTRATOR_PASSWORD_HERE" SETFQDN=`hostname -f` echo "NT Authentication test" echo ${SAMBA_NT_ADMIN_PASS}| smbclient //localhost/netlogon -U Administrator -c 'ls' echo "Kerberos Authentication" echo ${SAMBA_NT_ADMIN_PASS} | kinit
2015 Mar 19
2
Access to shares is denied after upgrading from 3.6.3 (openSUSE 12.1) to 4.1.17 (openSUSE 13.2)
Hi, please have a look into the attached smb.conf. The only changes since 3.6.3 are commenting out all *security* settings and adding winbind expand groups = 1 The attached smbusers hasn't been changed yet. When I try to access share \\platon\root<file:///\\platon\root> as fee\administrator I get the following: platon:~ # smbclient -c dir -W fee -U administrator%secret
2018 Jan 25
0
problem with lda
Op 1/24/2018 om 5:30 PM schreef Infoomatic: > Hello, > > I am currently testing the upgrade from our dovecot v2.2.23 to 2.3.0. I have a strange problem with lda. > We use bounce mails for internal users if they try to send virus/spammails. The exact same config works with 2.2.23, but not with 2.3.0. > > The relevant postfix/master.cf part: > dovecot unix - n n - - pipe > flags=DRhu user=vmail:vmail argv=/opt/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/deliver -d ${recipient} -f ${sender} > > On the s...
2011 Jun 08
1
Dovecot 2.0+LMTP: Legal MAIL FROM rejected?
Hi, I run Dovecot 2.0.13 fed by Postfix over LMTP. Today it rejected one mail Postfix and Amavis accepted, generating a bounce. It was just a spammail, but I think the sender address is legal according to RFC5321 and should be accepted. I don't like generating bounces, email should be either rejected by postfix/pre-queue-amavis or delivered. Jun 6 12:32:47 mail postfix/qmgr[840]:
1999 Apr 02
0
NETATALK support removed in SAMBA 2.0.3?!
I've just done a: ./configure --with-netatalk --with-mmap --with-ssl --with-quotas on my Linux 2.0.36/intel server... built samba 2.0.3 [release] successfully testparms is happy, my WinDoze clients are working smoothly (good job, Samba dudes!) I notice the netatalk.c file never gets compiled, doing mass-grep's (in all source/lib directories) on WITH_NETATALK don't show any
2004 May 01
1
Managed switch? | PRIO chain
Saw this command on slashdot (http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/03/24/0434224&mode=flat&tid=126&tid=95 ) to basically make a box behave like a managed switch: "tc qdisc add dev eth1 root tbf rate 250kbit latency 20ms burst 2kb" Followup:
2018 Jan 25
1
dovecot Digest, Vol 177, Issue 55
...ain; charset=utf-8 > > Op 1/24/2018 om 5:30 PM schreef Infoomatic: > > Hello, > > > > I am currently testing the upgrade from our dovecot v2.2.23 to 2.3.0. I > have a strange problem with lda. > > We use bounce mails for internal users if they try to send > virus/spammails. The exact same config works with 2.2.23, but not with > 2.3.0. > > > > The relevant postfix/master.cf part: > > dovecot unix - n n - - pipe > > flags=DRhu user=vmail:vmail argv=/opt/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/deliver > -d ${recipient} -...
1998 Sep 25
2
SAMBA digest 1822
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1998 21:38:54 -0500 > From: "Daryl L. Biberdorf" <darylb@superserve.com> > To: samba@sam > Subject: machine name lookups > Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.19980923213854.008144b0@pop.a001.sprintmail.com> > > > We have been looking for a way to notify our users when they > are running low on disk quota, without sending them mail. > WinPopup
1998 Sep 21
15
Unsubscribe
How do i unsubscribe??
1998 Sep 22
0
File copy speed differences... writing to SAMBA is faster than reading from it??!
Here's an interesting thing I notice between NTSP3 and Linux 2.0.33+ w/samba 1.9.18p8 [TCP_NODELAY, read prediction on, SND and RCV buffers to 64k, though I've tried 16k, 32K, 64k, max size 2k, 4k, 8k, 16k, no difference] When I copy a file from any share to my NT's HD, I get perhaps 280KB/sec. When I copy from NT HD to Samba share, I get almost 1MB/sec. Doesn't matter where