search for: spammail

Hi! I am using Postfix 2.3.8 and Dovecot 1.0.rc15. Virtual Domains and Mailboxes are configured. I tried to copy spammy Mail with Procmail, but Procmail only sees local mails. How to configure it to get a copy of spammy mails in a mbox or mail-dir?

Hello, I am currently testing the upgrade from our dovecot v2.2.23 to 2.3.0. I have a strange problem with lda. We use bounce mails for internal users if they try to send virus/spammails. The exact same config works with 2.2.23, but not with 2.3.0. The relevant postfix/master.cf part: dovecot unix - n n - - pipe flags=DRhu user=vmail:vmail argv=/opt/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/deliver -d ${recipient} -f ${sender} On the same machine, with 2.2.23 I...

...etreff: Re: problem with lda > > Op 1/24/2018 om 5:30 PM schreef Infoomatic: > > Hello, > > > > I am currently testing the upgrade from our dovecot v2.2.23 to 2.3.0. I have a strange problem with lda. > > We use bounce mails for internal users if they try to send virus/spammails. The exact same config works with 2.2.23, but not with 2.3.0. > > > > The relevant postfix/master.cf part: > > dovecot unix - n n - - pipe > > flags=DRhu user=vmail:vmail argv=/opt/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/deliver -d ${recipient} -f ${sende...

...erzeichnis > path = / > valid users = root > write list = root > writeable = Yes > guest ok = No > > [sms] > comment = sms-Mailverzeichnis > path = /var/spool/mail > valid users = root > write list = root > writeable = Yes > guest ok = No > > [spamMail] > comment = Spam Mail > path = /data/spamMail > valid users = root,webadmin > write list = root,webadmin > > force user = root > force group = root > create mask = 0600 > # security mask = 0600 > force create mode = 0600 > # force security mode = 0600 &gt...

...ot >> writeable = Yes >> guest ok = No >> >> [sms] >> comment = sms-Mailverzeichnis >> path = /var/spool/mail >> valid users = root >> write list = root >> writeable = Yes >> guest ok = No >> >> [spamMail] >> comment = Spam Mail >> path = /data/spamMail >> valid users = root,webadmin >> write list = root,webadmin >> >> force user = root >> force group = root >> create mask = 0600 >> # security mask = 0600 >>...

...guest ok = No >>> >>> [sms] >>> comment = sms-Mailverzeichnis >>> path = /var/spool/mail >>> valid users = root >>> write list = root >>> writeable = Yes >>> guest ok = No >>> >>> [spamMail] >>> comment = Spam Mail >>> path = /data/spamMail >>> valid users = root,webadmin >>> write list = root,webadmin >>> >>> force user = root >>> force group = root >>> create mask = 0600 >>>...

Hi, please have a look into the attached smb.conf. The only changes since 3.6.3 are commenting out all *security* settings and adding winbind expand groups = 1 The attached smbusers hasn't been changed yet. When I try to access share \\platon\root<file:///\\platon\root> as fee\administrator I get the following: platon:~ # smbclient -c dir -W fee -U administrator%secret

Op 1/24/2018 om 5:30 PM schreef Infoomatic: > Hello, > > I am currently testing the upgrade from our dovecot v2.2.23 to 2.3.0. I have a strange problem with lda. > We use bounce mails for internal users if they try to send virus/spammails. The exact same config works with 2.2.23, but not with 2.3.0. > > The relevant postfix/master.cf part: > dovecot unix - n n - - pipe > flags=DRhu user=vmail:vmail argv=/opt/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/deliver -d ${recipient} -f ${sender} > > On the...

Hi, I run Dovecot 2.0.13 fed by Postfix over LMTP. Today it rejected one mail Postfix and Amavis accepted, generating a bounce. It was just a spammail, but I think the sender address is legal according to RFC5321 and should be accepted. I don't like generating bounces, email should be either rejected by postfix/pre-queue-amavis or delivered. Jun 6 12:32:47 mail postfix/qmgr[840]: 991FC240DB: from=<admin <admin at kl38000.com>, size...

...ention of it in the FAQs or Changes logs, only that the support was ADDED sometime back in August]? Bad CVS check-in or merge? What's the story? If anyone knows what happened to this functionality and/or how to restore it, please let me know. I'd greatly appreciate an e-mail (mailto:spammail@mailgate.paypc.com) as this digested list makes it difficult for me to find replies to messages. Two other questions: 1) Are the Samba folks intending to add copyfile() [file to socket/socket to file, and in some incarnations, file-to-file(?) at the kernel level]. I know Linux 2.2 and the new...

...een mentioned a bit on the mailing list. Has anyone used this chain and was it good enough for your basic "I''ve got DSL at home and I want to give port 80 pririty over p2p" style basic tasks? -- Catholic.org is just my email provider, my main email. jago25_98@hotmail.com is my spammail account. ----------------------------------------- This email was sent using FREE Catholic Online Webmail! http://webmail.catholic.org/ _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

...ain; charset=utf-8 > > Op 1/24/2018 om 5:30 PM schreef Infoomatic: > > Hello, > > > > I am currently testing the upgrade from our dovecot v2.2.23 to 2.3.0. I > have a strange problem with lda. > > We use bounce mails for internal users if they try to send > virus/spammails. The exact same config works with 2.2.23, but not with > 2.3.0. > > > > The relevant postfix/master.cf part: > > dovecot unix - n n - - pipe > > flags=DRhu user=vmail:vmail argv=/opt/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/deliver > -d ${recipient}...

Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1998 21:38:54 -0500 > From: "Daryl L. Biberdorf" <darylb@superserve.com> > To: samba@sam > Subject: machine name lookups > Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.19980923213854.008144b0@pop.a001.sprintmail.com> > > > We have been looking for a way to notify our users when they > are running low on disk quota, without sending them mail. > WinPopup

How do i unsubscribe??

Here's an interesting thing I notice between NTSP3 and Linux 2.0.33+ w/samba 1.9.18p8 [TCP_NODELAY, read prediction on, SND and RCV buffers to 64k, though I've tried 16k, 32K, 64k, max size 2k, 4k, 8k, 16k, no difference] When I copy a file from any share to my NT's HD, I get perhaps 280KB/sec. When I copy from NT HD to Samba share, I get almost 1MB/sec. Doesn't matter where