Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "spacesav".
Did you mean:
spaces
2017 Mar 26
3
where to swap
...uld be
> > applied.
>
> The patch in <http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2017-March/025706.html>
> should be applied after reverting
> 48e94f4fa7b3c32cbd43b6e57c64bc933f76d059.
>
>
> Except possibly the xor %cx, %cx part as above depending on how
> causcious or spacesaving you want to be.
>
> It seems both Thomas and I think it should remain.
>
>
> --
> MartinS
Then I would suggest:
1_ revert the wrong commit;
2_ apply the first part of the "right" patch in one commit, as it
corrects one known bug;
3_ apply the second part of t...
2017 Mar 26
3
where to swap
> Hi,
>
> i wrote:
> > > I think it still has good reason to exist.
>
> Ady wrote:
> > Would you please clarify what do you mean with "it"?
>
> "It" was the code part about
>
> xor %cx, %cx /* Clear EBIOS flag. */
>
> which Martin mentioned as "can be ignored" in the the text which i
> quoted
2017 Mar 26
0
where to swap
...mits, or just the first part of the patch should be
> applied.
The patch in <http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2017-March/025706.html>
should be applied after reverting
48e94f4fa7b3c32cbd43b6e57c64bc933f76d059.
Except possibly the xor %cx, %cx part as above depending on how
causcious or spacesaving you want to be.
It seems both Thomas and I think it should remain.
--
MartinS
2017 Mar 26
0
where to swap
...t;>
>> The patch in <http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2017-March/025706.html>
>> should be applied after reverting
>> 48e94f4fa7b3c32cbd43b6e57c64bc933f76d059.
>>
>>
>> Except possibly the xor %cx, %cx part as above depending on how
>> causcious or spacesaving you want to be.
>>
>> It seems both Thomas and I think it should remain.
>>
>>
>> --
>> MartinS
>
>
> Then I would suggest:
> 1_ revert the wrong commit;
> 2_ apply the first part of the "right" patch in one commit, as it
> corrects...
2007 Mar 28
20
Gzip compression for ZFS
Adam,
With the blog entry[1] you''ve made about gzip for ZFS, it raises
a couple of questions...
1) It would appear that a ZFS filesystem can support files of
varying compression algorithm. If a file is compressed using
method A but method B is now active, if I truncate the file
and rewrite it, is A or B used?
2) The question of whether or not to use bzip2 was raised in
the