search for: sorre

...session proceeded along with? a bundle of the input data or at least? those portions that were successful in your eyes. > The extreme option would be to delete the whole of installed R GUI, after backing up the workspace. Some other way to secure the data/code? .Rdata is only a file. You could sorre it in encrypted form with Veracrypt. > > I've tried using Backup and sync by google, but that is very cumbersome. > > Please help. > > thanking you, > Yours sincerely, > AKSHAY M KULKARNI > > snipped HTML > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] You should...

Hi , I have a problem with NT 4.0 workstation with service pack 3 cant able to login to hp system. From FAQ what i understood is to modify the registry but even after modifying i couldn't able to login from NT 4.0 workstation. Can anybody can able to help me in this matter. Thx Ramesh -- ___________________________ Ramesh Ragineni Ilog (s) Pte Ltd Systems Engineer

dear members, I am a stock trader. I am using R for my research. I want to service my laptop, wherein resides all my R code, which, for obvious reasons, has to be secured. I am using Windows 7 Ultimate. I cannot encrypt the R data by Bitdefender, as it encrypts the entire drive. I anyway need to give the key when the system, if at all, gets locked when servicing. My

It seems very similar to http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=737 . You might want to check if it's the same problem. If not, then please create a new bug report. -bw On 9/20/06, Samuele Pedroni <pedronis at strakt.com> wrote: > The C backend can currently (recent head) produce code with such patterns: > > /* Global Declarations */ > /* Structure forward decls */ >

I looked at these once, Rowland. I am a novice and not wanting to run bind9 for the dns (one ADDC and three, maybe four clients) the SAMBA_INTERNAL DNS has always work fine for me in testing. These scripts were a "little too advanced" for my experience. (Not that it won't serve anyone else quite well.) Just surprised that there is so little, almost non-existent documentation for

The C backend can currently (recent head) produce code with such patterns: /* Global Declarations */ /* Structure forward decls */ struct l_structtype_s; /* Typedefs */ typedef struct l_structtype_s l_fixarray_array3[3]; /* problematic declaration */ typedef struct l_structtype_s l_structtype_s; /* Structure contents */ struct l_structtype_s { int field0; }; gcc 4.0.1 will reject this with

Hi, About a week ago I upgraded our reasonably heavily loaded mail servers from a pretty recent courier version to dovecot-1.1rc10. IMAP performance on dovecot is amazing, however POP3 performance is worse than courier :-( I have uploaded some munin graphs taken today to http://linweb.atlas.pipex.net/dovecot/; the dovecot server is handling about 2000 pop logins/sec and 300 imap sessions (but

On 06/12/14 20:34, Donelson Trophy wrote: > > > Thank you Hector. Despite my poor spanish, I can see that I need to > check what dependencies are loading with Sernet-samba. > > More tomorrow when I am at a better machine to communicate with the > forum on. > > Thanks. > > --- > > ------------------------- > > Bob Wooden of Donelson Trophy > >

I'm trying to setup a personal "mailmover" where I use getmail to retrieve remote IMAP server mail and load it into my local Dovecot then filter all email on the Dovecot server side with sieve. (I'm using Dovecot v. 2.0.9 with IMAP/Maildir.) 1) From the docs I gather that Dovecot sieve will not work as mail is loaded by getmail and I need to refilter the email after it has been