search for: somemodule

Why is that in so many plugins I see people using (including acts_as_taggable by DHH): # init.rb ActiveRecord::Base.send(:include, ActiveRecord::Acts::SomeModule) # lib/some_module.rb module ActiveRecord module Acts module SomeModule def self.included(base) base.extend(ClassMethods) end module ClassMethods def acts_as_something # code end end end end end why go through all that rather...

...classes that don''t map to the database, and I''d like to put some of these in seperate modules. I''ve been wrestling with this for 2 days and can''t figure out how to get it to work. Rails seems to handle it fine for controllers, though. I tried creating a class SomeModule::SomeClass. I have a file named ''some_class.rb'' in app/models/some_module. I keep getting this: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-1.1.1/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:186:in `const_missing'': uninitialized constant SomeClass (NameError) So, I tried creating...

...;#include "llvm/IR/IRBuilder.h"#include "llvm/Support/ManagedStatic.h"#include "llvm/Support/TargetSelect.h" using namespace llvm; int main() { InitializeNativeTarget(); LLVMContext Context; std::unique_ptr<Module> Owner = make_unique<Module>("SomeModule", Context); Module *M = Owner.get(); FunctionType *lambdaFT = FunctionType::get(Type::getInt32Ty(Context), false); Function *lambdaFN = Function::Create(lambdaFT, Function::ExternalLinkage, "lambda", Owner.get()); auto lambdaBody = []() { return 100; }; Function *mainF =...

Hello, After moving into the HEAD of rspec, I am greeted with a mountain of errors, which I expected, due to my specs not being migrated. I use hpricot for a lot of my view tests, as it is extremely simple to traverse the DOM with it. I used to include HpricotSpecHelper in spec_helper.rb, like so: require ''hpricot_spec_helper'' module Spec module Rails module Runner

Posted on stackoverflow but no traction yet: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12942505/why-does-using-set-trace-func-work-in-some-places-but-cause-unexpected-return-l The following is a generified part of the code in a gem I''m working on: module SomeModule class << self attr_accessor :procedure def log_events(*args) args.flatten! if args.size == 1 eval "set_trace_func proc {|event, file, line, id, binding, classname| begin; SomeModule.procedure.call(event, file, line, id, binding,...

Hi folks, I''ve poked around the language reference, and havent found anything on this so far. I''d like to be able to force a clean early exit from a module. WITHOUT encasing the whole body of the module in an if statement. What I''m looking for: class somemodule { #no this isnt going to be a global variable I''m just using that as an example, if $dont_load_module { return happy } // blah blah normal module goes on here } What I''d like to AVOID: class somemodule { if $dont_load_module != true { // body of module /...

...|ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From dtucker at zip.com.au 2004-01-22 22:09 ------- This is specific to the account configuration. Without going into too much detail, the problem is this: The accounts were configured with the following AIX authentication settings: SYSTEM=none auth1=somemodule auth2=none The problem is sshd uses AIX's authenticate() function, which knows only SYSTEM, not auth1 or auth2 (AFAIK those are the domain of ckuserID() which is documented as obsolete, and would be very difficult to support sanely in sshd anyway). I think the best sshd can do in this case is...

Hi all, With the goal of making my code a little more DRY, I am trying to define resource parameters in an array of hashes, and then create defined resources from these array items. I am having trouble figuring out the syntax for accessing the hash values for the hash currently being worked on ("self?"). Here''s the code to make it clear: ##### Configuration arguments

class User < AR end user = User.new Let''s say that I have a user instance with me. After this record is saved I want an after_save callback which would print the id of the record. The only catch is that I am not allowed to change the User class. How can I accomplish my goal? Is that even possible to add an after_save callback on a particular instance object. Any metaprogramming

...and using ENC. I wish to control as much of the configuration of machines via the dashboard. However, I have a requirement to call a module/class multiple times and was wondering if this is possible? in a normal manifest I''d do this with the following: node "somenode" { somemodule::submodule { "first": key => ''value''; "second": key => ''value'' } } How can i do that with the dashboard? It seems to me that class definitions need to include the ability to define variables So I could create multiple classes calli...

...es the arguments are. Just printing the value passed into the function could give the user insite as to how the program works. Useful in reverse engineering a proprietary driver. since dtrace ignores the argument type until told to cast it or read its value, it has no problem with this case. fbt:somemodule::entry { printf ( "arg1= %ld arg2=%ld\n", arg1, arg2); } It also comes into play when you are working with a precompiled script trying to probe a function thats prototype has changed since the script was last compiled. > > > When Systemtap gets userland probes its inferred v...