Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "somchai".
2016 Sep 12
3
-fsanitize=memory failing on 3.9.0
If you are on glibc-2.24, did you patch it with the fix
24e2b1cede1952d7d4411a3cafd25dd8593dab9f that revert commits
80f87443eed17838fe453f1f5406ccf5d3698c25 and
a824d609581d5ee7544aabcbbc70e8da44b2b5b6? I had to do that since it
broke go, gcc, and clang address sanitizers without the patch.
On 9/12/16, Renato Golin via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> On 11 September
2015 Dec 28
2
3.7.1 release cancelled?
Has it been decided to skip 3.7.1 and just wait until 3.8.0? I keep
checking but never see any update on the web site to allow downloading
3.7.1 tar files.
2015 Dec 30
2
3.7.1 release cancelled?
...ts.llvm.org> wrote:
> Got to admit, I'm curious too. I have finished migrating to the v3.7.1-final tags, and I'm waiting for the green light :-)
>
> MartinO
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Somchai Smythe via llvm-dev
> Sent: 28 December 2015 10:35
> To: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> Subject: [llvm-dev] 3.7.1 release cancelled?
>
> Has it been decided to skip 3.7.1 and just wait until 3.8.0? I keep checking but never see any update on the web site to allow downloading
> 3.7....
2017 Aug 29
9
[5.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 4 tagged
Hello testers,
5.0.0-rc4 was just tagged.
There were very few changes after rc3, and if nothing unexpected comes
up, this is what the final release will look like.
Please test and let me know if there are any issues.
Cheers,
Hans
2016 Jul 04
2
will 3.8.1 ever really have release tarballs?
Hello,
The llvm.org web site says the release would be in mid-june. There
was a message posted to the dev list that 3.8.1 was tagged. Then
there was another message that said essentially "don't make your own
tarballs - wait for release tarballs". I have two questions:
1. If the 3.8.1 tag does not represent what will be the tarball
contents, will the tag be moved when the
2016 Sep 12
2
-fsanitize=memory failing on 3.9.0
...c package
(https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/trunk?h=packages/glibc)
and don't see any local patches.
Therefore I assume it hasn't been patched.
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 1:38 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote:
> On 12 September 2016 at 07:11, Somchai Smythe
> <buraphalinuxserver at gmail.com> wrote:
>> If you are on glibc-2.24, did you patch it with the fix
>> 24e2b1cede1952d7d4411a3cafd25dd8593dab9f that revert commits
>> 80f87443eed17838fe453f1f5406ccf5d3698c25 and
>> a824d609581d5ee7544aabcbbc70e8da44b2b5b6?...
2018 Jun 07
4
[7.0.0 Release] Schedule proposal
Hello everyone,
There's plenty of time before the release process starts, but I'd like
to begin the schedule discussion.
For the September release we usually branch mid-July. However, this
year my vacation runs a little later, so a good branch date for me
would be the 1st of August.
Proposal:
- 1 August 2018: Branch; RC1 soon after
- 22 August 2018: RC2; all lose ends should be tied up
2019 Jul 18
7
[9.0.0 Release] The release branch is open; trunk is now 10.0.0
Hello everyone,
The release branch for LLVM 9 and its sub-projects was just created
from trunk at r366426, and the trunk version was subsequently bumped
to 10.0.0.
Release blockers are tracked by https://llvm.org/PR42474 Please mark
any bugs, old or new, that need to be fixed before the release as
blocking that.
To get a change committed to the branch, first commit it to trunk as
usual, and
2018 Nov 13
1
extlinux troubles....
Fine, I will do it all again and use some tool like 'script' to log
every single byte, but it'll be a few days before I can email that to
you since it takes overnight to zero out the drive to ensure no old
data will interfere, and copying the data from the old drive to the
new one is also rather slow.
For the record, I did RTFM. It has no complete examples for _ANY_ use
case, and you
2018 Nov 09
1
extlinux troubles....
Hello List Members,
I have a machine that has used extlinux to boot for many years, but
the hard disk needs to be replaced. I got a new hard disk and
installed it in my system. The old disk is /dev/sda, and the new one
is /dev/sdb. I'm using GPT partitioning, and I did (after a day)
finally get the legacy bootable flag set on /dev/sdb for the boot
partition /dev/sda1. I then formatted out
2018 Nov 12
3
extlinux troubles....
1. ext4
mke2fs -b 4096 -m 5 -t ext4 -O^uninit_bg -r 1 -v /dev/sdb1
sdparm --command=sync /dev/sdb
2. 150G
3. gdisk /dev/sdb
x
a
2
w
y
sdparm --command=sync /dev/sdb
4. mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt/sdb1
cd /mnt/sdb1
extlinux -i /mnt/sdb1/boot
umount /mnt/sdb1
sync;sync;sync
sdparm --command=sync /dev/sdb
cat gptmbr.bin >/dev/sdb1
sync;sync;sync
sdparm --command=sync /dev/sdb