Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "softenfloatresult".
2009 Apr 08
0
[LLVMdev] What is the state of LLVM's ARM backend
...loat related errors
> http://labb.zafena.se/shark-testing/llvmARMCodeGenFailures200904/softenfloat_Do_not_know_how_to_soften_the_result_of_this_operator/
> example:
>
> root at overo:/home/xerxes/llvm-test/fail/CodeGen/softenfloat# llvm-as < 2007-11-19-VectorSplitting.ll | llc
> SoftenFloatResult #0: 0x614e00: f32 = undef
> llc: /usr/src/openembedded/overo/tmp/work/armv7a-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/llvm2.6-2.6-r0/llvm-2.6/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeFloatTypes.cpp:54: void llvm::DAGTypeLegalizer::SoftenFloatResult(llvm::SDNode*, unsigned int): Assertion `0 && "Do not know...
2009 Apr 08
2
[LLVMdev] What is the state of LLVM's ARM backend
...>> http://labb.zafena.se/shark-testing/llvmARMCodeGenFailures200904/softenfloat_Do_not_know_how_to_soften_the_result_of_this_operator/
>> example:
>>
>> root at overo:/home/xerxes/llvm-test/fail/CodeGen/softenfloat# llvm-as < 2007-11-19-VectorSplitting.ll | llc
>> SoftenFloatResult #0: 0x614e00: f32 = undef
>> llc: /usr/src/openembedded/overo/tmp/work/armv7a-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/llvm2.6-2.6-r0/llvm-2.6/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeFloatTypes.cpp:54: void llvm::DAGTypeLegalizer::SoftenFloatResult(llvm::SDNode*, unsigned int): Assertion `0 && "Do not k...
2009 Apr 08
4
[LLVMdev] What is the state of LLVM's ARM backend
..."
Aborted
4. softfloat related errors
http://labb.zafena.se/shark-testing/llvmARMCodeGenFailures200904/softenfloat_Do_not_know_how_to_soften_the_result_of_this_operator/
example:
root at overo:/home/xerxes/llvm-test/fail/CodeGen/softenfloat# llvm-as < 2007-11-19-VectorSplitting.ll | llc
SoftenFloatResult #0: 0x614e00: f32 = undef
llc: /usr/src/openembedded/overo/tmp/work/armv7a-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/llvm2.6-2.6-r0/llvm-2.6/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeFloatTypes.cpp:54: void llvm::DAGTypeLegalizer::SoftenFloatResult(llvm::SDNode*, unsigned int): Assertion `0 && "Do not know how t...
2018 Nov 01
2
Proposed new min and max intrinsics
...objections.
Hi Thomas,
With ISD::FMINNAN and ISD::FMAXNAN now easy to produce for any target
due to these newly exposed intrinsics, I think these nodes should be
handled in at least SelectionDAGLegalize::ExpandNode (for when the
float type is legal but the operation is not) and
DAGTypeLegalizer::SoftenFloatResult (for when the float type is not
legal).
Best,
Alex
2009 Apr 01
0
[LLVMdev] What is the state of LLVM's ARM backend
LLVM ARM v6 backend is in fairly good shape. Even the JIT passes
nearly the entire llvm test suite. There are some known missing bits:
1. Exception handling
2. Atomic
Not sure:
3. Debugging support (should be trivial to hook up if it's not done)
Also the thumb backend is not awesome. Its performance is not great.
Evan
On Apr 1, 2009, at 6:34 AM, Robert Schuster wrote:
> Hi,
> the
2009 Apr 01
4
[LLVMdev] What is the state of LLVM's ARM backend
Hi,
the ARM backend lacks some stuff like support for atomic intrinsics. I
learned the hard way (crash). Lately I was told that the ARM backend of
LLVM is generally in its early stages of development.
I would like to know more about this. Which stuff is missing, known to
be unstable and the like.
Thanks in advance for taking the time.
Regards
Robert
-------------- next part --------------
A
2018 Nov 08
2
Proposed new min and max intrinsics
...FMINNAN and ISD::FMAXNAN now easy to produce for any target
>> due to these newly exposed intrinsics, I think these nodes should be
>> handled in at least SelectionDAGLegalize::ExpandNode (for when the
>> float type is legal but the operation is not) and
>> DAGTypeLegalizer::SoftenFloatResult (for when the float type is not
>> legal).
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Alex
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20181107/a3bc8898/attachment.html>