Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "softenfloat#".
2009 Apr 08
0
[LLVMdev] What is the state of LLVM's ARM backend
Hi Xerxes,
> 4. softfloat related errors
> http://labb.zafena.se/shark-testing/llvmARMCodeGenFailures200904/softenfloat_Do_not_know_how_to_soften_the_result_of_this_operator/
> example:
>
> root at overo:/home/xerxes/llvm-test/fail/CodeGen/softenfloat# llvm-as < 2007-11-19-VectorSplitting.ll | llc
> SoftenFloatResult #0: 0x614e00: f32 = undef
> llc: /usr/src/openembedded/overo/tmp/work/armv7a-an...
2009 Apr 08
4
[LLVMdev] What is the state of LLVM's ARM backend
...:/home/xerxes/llvm-test/fail/CodeGen/matchmemoryaddress# llvm-as < 2007-04-08-MultipleFrameIndices.ll | llc
Could not match memory address. Inline asm failure!
.file "<stdin>"
Aborted
4. softfloat related errors
http://labb.zafena.se/shark-testing/llvmARMCodeGenFailures200904/softenfloat_Do_not_know_how_to_soften_the_result_of_this_operator/
example:
root at overo:/home/xerxes/llvm-test/fail/CodeGen/softenfloat# llvm-as < 2007-11-19-VectorSplitting.ll | llc
SoftenFloatResult #0: 0x614e00: f32 = undef
llc: /usr/src/openembedded/overo/tmp/work/armv7a-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/llvm...
2009 Apr 08
2
[LLVMdev] What is the state of LLVM's ARM backend
Duncan Sands skrev:
> Hi Xerxes,
>
>
>> 4. softfloat related errors
>> http://labb.zafena.se/shark-testing/llvmARMCodeGenFailures200904/softenfloat_Do_not_know_how_to_soften_the_result_of_this_operator/
>> example:
>>
>> root at overo:/home/xerxes/llvm-test/fail/CodeGen/softenfloat# llvm-as < 2007-11-19-VectorSplitting.ll | llc
>> SoftenFloatResult #0: 0x614e00: f32 = undef
>> llc: /usr/src/openembedded/overo...
2009 Apr 01
0
[LLVMdev] What is the state of LLVM's ARM backend
LLVM ARM v6 backend is in fairly good shape. Even the JIT passes
nearly the entire llvm test suite. There are some known missing bits:
1. Exception handling
2. Atomic
Not sure:
3. Debugging support (should be trivial to hook up if it's not done)
Also the thumb backend is not awesome. Its performance is not great.
Evan
On Apr 1, 2009, at 6:34 AM, Robert Schuster wrote:
> Hi,
> the
2009 Apr 01
4
[LLVMdev] What is the state of LLVM's ARM backend
Hi,
the ARM backend lacks some stuff like support for atomic intrinsics. I
learned the hard way (crash). Lately I was told that the ARM backend of
LLVM is generally in its early stages of development.
I would like to know more about this. Which stuff is missing, known to
be unstable and the like.
Thanks in advance for taking the time.
Regards
Robert
-------------- next part --------------
A