search for: soakings

On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 09:58:43AM -0500, Sean Paul wrote: > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 03:43:56PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > On 2018-02-14 03:08 PM, Sean Paul wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 10:26:35AM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > > >> Op 14-02-18 om 09:46 schreef Lukas Wunner: > > >>> On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 10:38:28AM +0100, Lukas Wunner

Dear Friends, I'm trying to generate a sequence of 100 observations with either a 1 or -1. In other words the sequence should look something like this. y = 1 1 -1 1 -1 -1 -1 1 1 ...... Can somebody please give me some direction on how I can do this in R. Thanks Anup ____________________________________________________________________________________ Don't get soaked. Take a

On 2018-02-14 03:08 PM, Sean Paul wrote: > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 10:26:35AM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> Op 14-02-18 om 09:46 schreef Lukas Wunner: >>> Dear drm-misc maintainers, >>> >>> On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 10:38:28AM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote: >>>> Fix a deadlock on hybrid graphics laptops that's been present since 2013: >>>

Op 14-02-18 om 09:46 schreef Lukas Wunner: > Dear drm-misc maintainers, > > On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 10:38:28AM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote: >> Fix a deadlock on hybrid graphics laptops that's been present since 2013: > This series has been reviewed, consent has been expressed by the most > interested parties, patch [1/5] which touches files outside drivers/gpu > has been

Hi all, I am almost ready for the last step with landing my long-standing patch. I have converted (almost) all low-level interface users of CallInst to respective high-level interfaces. What remains is a handful of hunks to flip the switch. But before I do the final commit I'd like to coerce all external users to code against the high-level interface too. This will (almost, but see below)

hi After compiling and installing pwlib and openh323 , the asterisk, give the folloing error. please tell me where the problem is ? Best Mani *CLI> -- Executing Dial("SIP/2.2.2.2-086f5ac0", "H323/652#150388590962@1.1.1.1|60") in new stack Mar 28 14:17:23 WARNING[11985]: channel.c:2576 ast_request: No translator path exists for channel type H323 (native 4) to 256 Mar 28

Hello, I apologize for the duplicate post, but I made a typo last time. I am trying to notify the service, not subscribe to it. Also, I found that notifying a service, in this case nfs, appears to cause the service to load even if the service is configured to be disabled. Is this supposed to happen, or should the ensure => stopped state be enforced even during a notify? Thank you, -- Rob

List, I just left an environment where I was running R and mysql on CENTOS. At the time of install, RMySQL was available on CRAN. Later installs on Ubuntu were possible because it was available as a package in the base repos. Now I'm in a new environment where I have no choice but to use Windows XP. I have just installed R 2.4.1 and MySQL 5.0.27. The installation instructions for getting

Hi, Johnny, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 5/2/19 9:15 AM, mark wrote: >> >> Especially Johnny - could you possibly push this fix through as soon as >> upstream puts it out? It's a real issue for us - we've had a number of >> servers whether gssproxy keeps SEGVing, which hits NFS and samba. > > See if this fixes your issues .. if do, let me know and we can

Hello I''ve noticed that Lustre network error, especially LND errors, are considered as maskable errors. That means that on a production node, where debug mask is 0, those specific errors won''t be displayed if they happened. Does that mean that they are harmless? Do upper-layers resend their RPC/packet if LNDs report an error? When, in my case, o2iblnd says something like

Hello I''ve noticed that Lustre network error, especially LND errors, are considered as maskable errors. That means that on a production node, where debug mask is 0, those specific errors won''t be displayed if they happened. Does that mean that they are harmless? Do upper-layers resend their RPC/packet if LNDs report an error? When, in my case, o2iblnd says something like

On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 14:22 -0800, John R Pierce wrote: > the only truly safe way to destroy data on magnetic media is to grind > the media up into filings or melt it down in a furnace. I unscrew the casing, extract the disk platter(s), slide a very strong magnet over both sides of the platter surface then bend the platter in half. How secure is that ? I can't afford a machine that

> -----Original Message----- > From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On > Behalf Of EGO-II.1 > Sent: den 9 februari 2016 09:00 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Utility to zero unused blocks on disk > > > > >> the only truly safe way to destroy data on magnetic media is to grind > >> the media up into

On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 06:38:44AM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote: > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 09:58:43AM -0500, Sean Paul wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 03:43:56PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > On 2018-02-14 03:08 PM, Sean Paul wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 10:26:35AM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > > > >> Op 14-02-18 om 09:46 schreef Lukas

I wanted to create a list of functions whose output differs depending the value of a variable when the function was created. Generally this did not work. Each function was exactly the same, as in the simple example below: get_data_function <- function(v) { function() { print(v) } } data_functions <- sapply(1:10,function(v) get_data_function(v)) (data_functions[[1]])() # prints 10!

I''m trying to wrap my caffeine soaked brain around has_many :through following along at: http://rails.techno-weenie.net/tip/2005/12/23/teaching_your_blog_model_new_tricks_with_has_many_through I think my models are a little more complex than what fits this narrative. I have a directory of members, each member can belong to multiple categories. The category table references itself

Am 30.06.2010 um 23:31 schrieb John Criswell: > > Stupid question: is making the getOperand() method of CallInst > going to work? For example, if I have the following code: > > void > method (Instruction * I) { > I->getOperand(2); > ... > } > > void method2 (CallInst * CI) { > method (CI); > ... > } > > Will method() still work

Hi Everyone, Many tech communities, including GitHub <https://github.com/github/renaming> and Git <https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname/>, have moved away from term “master branch” and replaced it with “main branch” in an effort to remove unnecessary references to slavery and use more inclusive terms. This was also discussed on the LLVM-dev mailing list

Gabor Greif wrote: > Hi all, > > I am almost ready for the last step with landing my long-standing patch. > I have converted (almost) all low-level interface users of CallInst to > respective high-level interfaces. What remains is a handful of hunks > to flip the switch. > > But before I do the final commit I'd like to coerce all external users > to code against the

Well I have determined that everytime someone logs in/logs out of a windows box in our lab *ALL* of the files in "My Directory" are copied from/to the file server to the local client. Needless to say this is retarded and needs to stop. The local sys admin needs to perform some windows voodoo to redirect this directory. Still this brings the mystery as to why smbd would take up so much