search for: snazzy

...nalysis on LLVM representation and assembler for that processor, so it would > be more convenient if assembler is produced by LLVM, and not the standard > compiler. Ohhh, sounds great. From a brief look through their data sheets, it looks like it's a pretty RISCy processor, but has some snazzy addressing modes with pre/post in/decrements. I assume that you're planning on only targetting the RISC core and not the vector copro? -Chris -- http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/ http://www.nondot.org/~sabre/Projects/

Unless someone already has a snazzy isolinux image that lets you select multiple makes and models to update bios's that's willing to share. I was curious if someone could tell me how to go from my isolinux.cfg into sub menu categories so instead of having one great big menu with multiple makes models and bios revisions, I can...

Hi, I'm putting some promotional material together and noticed that most proprietary codec manufacturers have a nice eye-catching memorable logo. Does the CELT codec have a snazzy logo that I can use as a nice memory aid when telling people how great the codec is? thank you, Paul.

...tation and > > assembler for that processor, so it would be more convenient if assembler > > is produced by LLVM, and not the standard compiler. > > Ohhh, sounds great. From a brief look through their data sheets, it looks > like it's a pretty RISCy processor, but has some snazzy addressing modes > with pre/post in/decrements. Yes. It's my impression that most DSPs have such "snazzy" addressing modes ;-) > I assume that you're planning on only > targetting the RISC core and not the vector copro? Right. It would be experemely hard to generate...

Chris Lattner wrote: > > 1. The MachineInstrBuilder has methods to add register operand and > > immediate operand. However, what would be really nice is a method to add > > Value*. So, I would write: > > > > BuildMI(*BB, NM::add, 1).add(I.getOperand(0), I.getOperand(1)); > > > > and depending on whether the passed Value* is contant or instruction,

In case anyone is interested, the YP I run now supports clustering of servers. The clustering is based off "Server Name" + "Listing IP"....currently, clustering of relays from multiple machines are not supported (unless they appear to be coming from the same IP)...This means if you are running multiple mountpoints on the same server, and your server name is the same for

R Home Page Graphic Competition =============================== We're looking for a snazzy graphic for the home page of the R Project. Please send us your favourite R image and the best (as chosen by R-core) will be used on the web site. The author of the winning image will also receive *free registration* for the useR! 2004 conference (http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/Conferences/useR-20...

...svn Unfortunately, that means I''m using an old version of the generator. So for example, when I just tried this, the generator made a conf/ directory, whereas the code in trunk expects config/. Equally, I can''t test any new features recently added into the generator (such as the snazzy new screens committed in r464-r466), without first building trunk into a gem, and gem installing it over my existing one. I have tried: svn co http://svn.devjavu.com/merb/trunk merb cd merb ruby -Ilib bin/merb -g /var/tmp/test123 but I get: Couldn''t find ''merb'' genera...

...ffer, would be to capture a llvm build as done with the current Makefile setup, and create a set of BSD Makefiles which would work with BSD Makefiles and cooperate with the BSD template Makefiles (such as bsd.prog.mk, bsd.lib.mk, etc). I think that the only thing that CMake is offering you is that snazzy buildtime clock, but I think that's all. If you folks felt this would be desireable. If llvm gets brought into any BSD, it's going to have to be created by the BSD involved, anyhow ... well nearly all, I've seen recently that OpenBSD seems to be making use of outside makefiles in outs...

I have launched a free Ruby on Rails hosting site as my gift back to the rails community. For details visit http://www.railsplayground.com. -- Joe Clarke www.clarkeweb.com

----- Original Message ---- > From: Chuck Robey <chuckr at telenix.org> > To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 9:22:53 AM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Arm port > > OK, I've got enough to go on with, and I'm getting ready right now to begin > reading the dragon book, but one question bothers me regarding the

Eribium, a content managing system built with rails has been released completely free under the MIT License. http://www.eribium.org/eribium/?p=21 You can find a demo here: http://alexmaccaw.no-ip.info:3000/admin (user and pass are ''demo''). Some of the features include: * Completely Unobtrusive Javascript. * Liquid View, works with pretty much any screen resolution.

...pture a llvm build as done with the current > Makefile setup, and create a set of BSD Makefiles which would work with BSD > Makefiles and cooperate with the BSD template Makefiles (such as bsd.prog.mk, > bsd.lib.mk, etc). I think that the only thing that CMake is offering you is > that snazzy buildtime clock, but I think that's all. If you folks felt this > would be desireable. If llvm gets brought into any BSD, it's going to have to > be created by the BSD involved, anyhow ... well nearly all, I've seen recently > that OpenBSD seems to be making use of outside ma...

So you all know I've been working with Speex on iGlance for ages. Well, I'm happy to report that after all this time, it's done. (Well, as much as anything in this space is ever done, but it works for some large subset of users, and it has a snazzy website to promote it.) For details, please see: http://www.iglance.com To review, iGlance is a P2P VoIP/videoconferencing application with push to talk, video presence, screen sharing, file transfers, and more. It does NAT traversal, has a custom GUI layer, is open source, and is built atop...

Nice work, yeah. But wasn't there some plan already in the standard-docs to use Servername + "cluster password" for listing a cluster of servers? Well okay, but maybe this requires an addition to icecast2 :-) <p>Thank you for the good work Stefan On 26 Jun 2003 at 19:28, oddsock wrote: > In case anyone is interested, the YP I run now supports clustering of >

...39;s > a huge installed base of TMG users -- probably some would come over to > Linux if there was a proven reliable way to run it. I grabbed the trial. It's lacking some font, and some dll. Try opening an xterm, cd to the directory, and run winedbg tmg.exe or WINEDEBUG=<something snazzy> winedbg tmg.exe You get specific errors that way

...m smaller ones. * A "sum" method to aggregate rows or columns of ACS data, dealing correctly with both estimates and standard errors. * A new "apply" method to allow users to apply virtually any function to each row or column of an acs data object. * A snazzy new "plot" method capable of plotting both density plots (for estimates of a single geography and variable) and multiple estimates with errors bars (for estimates of the same variable over multiple geographies, or vice versa). * New functions two deal with adjusting...

...m smaller ones. * A "sum" method to aggregate rows or columns of ACS data, dealing correctly with both estimates and standard errors. * A new "apply" method to allow users to apply virtually any function to each row or column of an acs data object. * A snazzy new "plot" method capable of plotting both density plots (for estimates of a single geography and variable) and multiple estimates with errors bars (for estimates of the same variable over multiple geographies, or vice versa). * New functions two deal with adjusting...

So you all know I've been working with Theora on iGlance for ages. Well, I'm happy to report that after all this time, it's done. (Well, as much as anything in this space is ever done, but it works for some large subset of users, and it has a snazzy website to promote it.) For details, please see: http://www.iglance.com To review, iGlance is a P2P VoIP/videoconferencing application with push to talk, video presence, screen sharing, file transfers, and more. It does NAT traversal, has a custom GUI layer, is open source, and is built atop...

I have a Red Hat 7.0 system, plus glibc-2.2 and gcc-2.96.69. When I run the R demo 'demo("graphics") with KDE it runs fine, but when I try it with Gnome it croaks: demo(graphics) ---- ~~~~~~~~ Type <Return> to start : > opar <- par(ask = interactive() && (.Device %in% c("X11", "GTK", "windows", "Macintosh")))