Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "smb02".
Did you mean:
smb01
2013 May 03
2
Recently joined 2k3, shut down primary, seized roles, now have slight dns (maybe) problem.
.../usr/local/samba/lib/python2.7/site-packages/samba/netcmd/dns.py",
line 974, in run
None, record_type, select_flags, None, None)
Also, we cannot delete NS records pointing to old DCs. Tried nsupdate,
which gives no error message. Also tried specifying the zone, also wo
success.
root at smb02:~# nsupdate -d
> server 192.168.0.158
> update delete grupofw.local in ns serv-pdc03.grupofw.local.
> update delete grupofw.local in ns serv-pfw01.grupofw.local.
> update delete grupofw.local in ns serv-pdc02.grupofw.local.
> update delete grupofw.local in ns serv-pdc01.grupofw.local...
2009 Aug 03
1
CTDB+GFS2+CMAN. clean_start="0" or clean_start="1"?
...quot;>
<fence>
<!-- Handle fencing manually -->
<method name="human">
<device name="human" nodename="smb01"/>
</method>
</fence>
</clusternode>
<clusternode name="smb02" votes="1" nodeid="2">
<fence>
<!-- Handle fencing manually -->
<method name="human">
<device name="human" nodename="smb02"/>
</method>
</fence>
</clust...
1998 May 11
1
(wtmp) Suggestion to samba
Joao Carlos Mendes Luis <jonny@coe.ufrj.br> wrote:
> I think it would be useful if samba had a utmp log interface.
> I know that it's possible to see who is logged with smbstatus, but
> sometimes a simple who(1) or w(1) is more efficient and ubiquitous.
If you were to search for 'wtmp' in the 1997 archives
(via the Samba web pages), you would find one interesting