search for: smartjacks

Hi all, i am trying to setup my first t1 in asterisk, i have been using asterisk for several years but ahve never needed a t1 line before. I have a sangoma card already in the server with 4fxo ports. Now i ordered two single port t1 line cards from sangoma for the two servers i am connecting with the point 2 point t1. I am currently at the location trying to set things up but have some

Hi all, anyone could pls explain me what does it means ? It a part of zaptel.conf file. LBO= Line Build Out 0: 0 dB (CSU) / 0 - 133 feet (DSX-1) 1: 133 - 266 feet (DSX-1) 2: 266 - 299 feet (DSX-1) 3: 399 - 533 feet (DSX-1) 4: 533 - 655 feet (DSX-1) 5: -7.5 dB (CSU) 6: -15 dB (CSU) 7: -22.5 dB (CSU) Thanks Giordano -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG

...t does work if all 24 channels are assigned to PRI or data. I've always suspected this T1 line has some problem (large data transfers occasionally timeout, and I sometimes catch packet loss under high load), but I don't have any good ways of testing it. The phone company tests to their smartjacks and claims everything is great, but the smartjack is a long way from the equipment and I don't trust the guy that did the wiring too much. This line was once used for a frame relay circuit and repurposed, whereas the working line was installed as a bare point to point circuit from the star...

I hope someone can help me out with this issue. It has been dogging me for months and I can't seem to get it to go away. I have a Rhino Ceros box running Asterisk 1.4.21.2 connected via eth0 (nVidia MCP61 Ethernet) to a RedFone FoneBRIDGE2 dual-port with EC. The FB is the latest hardware rev and the latest firmware. I'm running the latest fonulator version and I'm running Zap-1.4.11

> Close. 10/100mbps Ethernet uses wires 1,2,3,6 but that is pair 2 & 3. > Pair > one is the pair up the dead center (pins 4&5), pair 2 is pins 1&2, pair 3 > is > 3&6 and pair 4 is 7&8. A T1 uses pairs 1&2, which is why you can't use a > regular crossover cable for a T1 crossover, but you can use a regular > ethernet patch cable as a T1 patch

I'm running Asterisk 1.2.26.1 svn rev 79171 on Trixbox 2.2. libpri 1.2.7 and zaptel 1.2.22.1. The hardware is a HP dl360 single cpu with a TE220B. The system load is below 0.10. I moved the server into production, with one PRI, on Friday. On that day we handled a couple thousand calls and I only saw one HDLC abort message. On Saturday half the calls and two abort messages an hour

Hi, i am having a problem with my point to point t1, which is being resolved and is a seperate issue. sangoma support has been a huge help and i am waiting on verizon to increase the signal output of the smartjack. But my issue is that in the meantime my fallover extensions arent working. Well they are on the CPE side but not on the NET side. The NET side still thinks its making calls, they

I've been going back and forth with my telco for several days, trying different configurations to get a new PRI to come up. The bchannels are all up and the T1 is not in alarm status. The dchannel refuses to come up however. We've tried ni2, qsig, and now dms100 for the switchtype. The telco tech I've been working with says that he's been sending "reset all channels"

I am connecting a t100p to a b8zs, superframe, loopstart t1. Previously I've attached to e&m wink and pri lines with no problems; however I seem to be missing something. Should it be fxols in the zaptel.conf (smartjack to x100p) or fxsls? With e&m wink the dnis set was 100, so it was easy to make an extension 100; and it would answer incoming calls. How do you get a loopstart to

...t? I am having some issues with a Point to point T1 line using zaptel ppp. This line gave us small problems when we had a pair of Cisco 2600's on either end but now with the zaptel ppp it is going down every couple of minutes for 15 intervals. The phone company says the line is good to the smartjacks but says they were unable to loop up the asterisk boxes at either end. (And there is a fairly long and untrustworthy cat 5 extension from the smart jacks to the asterisk boxes.) Thanks Mark Farver

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Jan Prunk <janprunk at gmail.com> Date: Sep 13, 2007 3:35 PM Subject: Bad FCS error To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com Hello ! I am getting the following error in asterisk logs: Sep 11 17:33:30 NOTICE[2187] chan_zap.c: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Sep 11 21:45:08 NOTICE[2187] chan_zap.c: PRI got event:

Hi! I'm trying to setup a Wildcard TE110P with a PRI in The Netherlands. I get a Red Alarm on the line. Is there any way of debugging this? I've tried some configs that should work but without success. Is there any way of telling if the cabling is correct or what else the problem could be? Thanks!! Remco

SYNOPSIS Erratic red alarm T1 PRI on asterisk, but zttool running concurrently during alarm shows no errors, irq misses, or alarms, on any span. Using asterisk and quad Digium T405P, configured as follows: Span 1 connects to ISDN PRI (fractional 8 B channels, D channel 24). Span 2 connects to T1 Mux and analog stations. Span 3 connects to ISDN PRI Nortel BCM hybrid key system digital trunk.

Hello, I am wanting to close a specific channel for example; SofthangUp(SIP/EXTEN-UNIQUEID) but the problem is the channel is assigned a unique id as well. The need fits into the idea of receiving a call from a higher status user and thus closing a specific channel to allow the higher priority call to route through the dial plan to the freed extension. Any ideas welcome. Many thanks