Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "sloppier".
Did you mean:
floppies
2007 Jan 16
1
nonlinear regression: nls, gnls, gnm, other?
...ogistic function, but I want to be able to modify
the saturation amplitude by a few parameters (Beta1) and shift the
inflection point around with a few other parameters (Beta2). I have a
ton of data, but I often have trouble getting the routine to fit.
(I've been using nlin in SAS, which seems sloppier in terms of
accepted convergence.)
Now, from what I can tell, I can use nls, gnls, or gnm to fit
something like this, but I can't tell which would be better, or if
there's something else I should be trying. To do this right, though,
I have to do a lot more reading, but I'd like to kno...
2008 Dec 22
1
Disconnect queues members every night
Hi,
To force user to behave correctly, i want to make a process of disconnecting
every member but one (special alarm phone) every day at a special time.
I'm thinking of a cron job that will create a "call file" that will dial an
appropriate extension to do the job, is this the correct way ?
I'm facing two problems however, the call file system is here to connect a
channel to
2008 Mar 13
2
CentOS 5.1 install via PXE Failure
Hi All,
This has to be something simple....but it's really busting my chops. We have
a PXE boot server that is used for initial installation of a number of
operating systems and it works well. However the CentOS 5.1 x86_64 install
is seriously broken.
We've made the PXE boot images available from
"centos/5/os/x86_64/images/pxeboot/" in the tftp boot etc. We've rsynced
2013 Oct 11
3
matrix values linked to vector index
Hi,
In the example you showed:
m1<- matrix(0,length(vec),max(vec))
1*!upper.tri(m1)
#or
?m1[!upper.tri(m1)] <-? rep(rep(1,length(vec)),vec)
#But, in a case like below, perhaps:
vec1<- c(3,4,5)
?m2<- matrix(0,length(vec1),max(vec1))
?indx <- cbind(rep(seq_along(vec1),vec1),unlist(tapply(vec1,list(vec1),FUN=seq),use.names=FALSE))
m2[indx]<- 1
?m2
#???? [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5]
2016 Feb 13
2
Code in headers
> On Feb 11, 2016, at 12:43 AM, via llvm-dev <Alexander G. Riccio> wrote:
>
> I don’t think that we can agree to abstract code guidelines without knowing what it means in practice for the codebase. If you’re interested in this, please include a diff that shows the impact to the headers, and we should also measure what happens to the performance of the generated compiler.
>
>